Comparative life cycle assessment of safety shoes toe caps manufacturing processes

被引:3
|
作者
Bianchi, Iacopo [1 ]
Forcellese, Archimede [1 ]
Simoncini, Michela [1 ]
Vita, Alessio [1 ]
Castorani, Vincenzo [2 ]
Cafagna, Damiana [3 ]
Buccoliero, Giuseppe [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Politecn Delle Marche, Via Brecce Bianche 12, Ancona, Italy
[2] HP Composites, Via Del Lampo, Ascoli Piceno, Italy
[3] Base Protect, Barletta, Italy
[4] CETMA, Brindisi, Italy
关键词
LCA; Prepreg scraps; CFRP; Safety footwear; Toe caps; HIGH-STRENGTH; AUTOCLAVE; PREPREG; WASTE; REUSE; RESIN;
D O I
10.1007/s00170-022-09240-x
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Toe caps are fundamental components of safety footwear used to prevent injuries, which can be caused by falling objects. They can be realized by exploiting different materials (metal, composites, and polymers) and manufacturing processes (stamping, injection molding, compression molding, etc.). However, they have always to fulfill the stringent requirements of safety regulations. In addition, in order to guarantee ergonomic use, they must be as light as possible. It was estimated that at least 300 million pairs of safety footwear, with 600 million of toe caps, end up in landfill or are incinerated every year. This huge amount of wastes generates a high environmental impact, mainly attributable to toe caps manufacturing processes. In this context, it is important to develop new solutions aimed at minimizing the environmental impacts of toe caps manufacturing processes. Furthermore, the reuse of carbon fiber prepreg scraps has been recognized as a valid method to produce effective toe caps. In this paper, the life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology was exploited to perform a detailed analysis of the environmental impacts associated with toe caps obtained by reclaiming prepreg scraps. The results, in terms of cumulative energy demand, global warming potential, and ReCiPe endpoints, were compared to those obtained by LCA of toe caps in steel, aluminum alloy, polycarbonate, and glass fiber reinforced composite. The analysis demonstrated that toe caps in steel present the lowest environmental footprint but they are the heaviest ones. The reclaim process for carbon fiber prepreg scraps can be a valid alternative to produce sustainable and lightweight toe caps for safety footwear.
引用
收藏
页码:7363 / 7374
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Comparative life-cycle impact assessment of concrete manufacturing in Singapore
    Gursel, Aysegul Petek
    Ostertag, Claudia
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2017, 22 (02): : 237 - 255
  • [12] A Life Cycle Assessment of Reusable and Disposable Surgical Caps
    Donahue, Laura M.
    Petit, Hayley J.
    Thiel, Cassandra L.
    Sullivan, Gwyneth A.
    Gulack, Brian C.
    Shah, Ami N.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2024, 299 : 112 - 119
  • [13] Life cycle assessment comparison of emerging and traditional Titanium dioxide manufacturing processes
    Middlemas, Scott
    Fang, Z. Zak
    Fan, Peng
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2015, 89 : 137 - 147
  • [14] Comparative Study of Life Cycle Assessment of Tanning Processes Based on eFootprint
    Fan, Shan
    Wang, Yujuan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF LEATHER TECHNOLOGISTS AND CHEMISTS, 2024, 108 (02): : 90 - 96
  • [15] Investigation on the Comparative Life Cycle Assessment between Newly Manufacturing and Remanufacturing Turbochargers
    Gao, Wang
    Li, Tao
    Tang, Zijue
    Peng, Shitong
    Zhang, Hong-chao
    [J]. 24TH CIRP CONFERENCE ON LIFE CYCLE ENGINEERING, 2017, 61 : 750 - 755
  • [16] Comparative life cycle assessment of aluminium and CFRP composites: the case of aerospace manufacturing
    Atescan-Yuksek, Yagmur
    Mills, Andrew
    Ayre, David
    Koziol, Krzysztof
    Salonitis, Konstantinos
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 131 (7-8): : 4307 - 4326
  • [17] Comparative life cycle assessment of aluminium and CFRP composites: the case of aerospace manufacturing
    Yagmur Atescan-Yuksek
    Andrew Mills
    David Ayre
    Krzysztof Koziol
    Konstantinos Salonitis
    [J]. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2024, 131 : 4345 - 4357
  • [18] Life Cycle Assessment and Cost Analysis of Additive Manufacturing Repair Processes in the Mold Industry
    Gouveia, Joana R.
    Pinto, Sara M.
    Campos, Sara
    Matos, Joao R.
    Sobral, Joao
    Esteves, Silvia
    Oliveira, Luis
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (04)
  • [19] Energy in chemical manufacturing processes: gate-to-gate information for life cycle assessment
    Kim, S
    Overcash, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2003, 78 (09) : 995 - 1005
  • [20] Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Different Production Processes for Waterborne Polyurethane Dispersions
    Klug, Valentin
    Schoeggl, Josef-Peter
    Dallinger, Doris
    Hiebler, Katharina
    Stueckler, Clemens
    Steiner, Andreas
    Arzt, Anton
    Kappe, C. Oliver
    Baumgartner, Rupert J.
    [J]. ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING, 2021, 9 (27) : 8980 - 8989