Development and applications of the single-case design risk of bias tool for evaluating single-case design research study reports

被引:63
|
作者
Reichow, Brian [1 ]
Barton, Erin E. [2 ]
Maggin, Daniel M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[2] Vanderbilt Univ, 221 Kirkland Hall, Nashville, TN 37235 USA
[3] Univ Illinois, Chicago, IL 60680 USA
关键词
Single-case design; Meta-analysis; Risk of bias; Systematic review; INTERVENTION; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ridd.2018.05.008
中图分类号
G76 [特殊教育];
学科分类号
040109 ;
摘要
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses can be a useful method for synthesizing evidence across multiple studies to draw conclusions about a research base. An important aspect of rigorous systematic reviews is an assessment of the study methods and potential biases impacting results or interpretations and conclusions of the primary studies. Single-case design (SCD) research has been a primary mechanism for identifying evidence-based practices across disciplines, but primarily in behavioral fields and special education. While the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool has been adapted for use in reviews of non-randomized studies, there is currently no guidance for evaluating SCD research. Hence, we developed a single case design risk of bias tool (SCD RoB) based on current conceptualizations of biases that might affect the validity of claims from single-case design research. We used the Cochrane risk of bias criteria and contemporary single-case design quality indicators and design standards to guide development. We describe the SCD RoB tool and two early applications of its use to demonstrate its application and provide initial validation. We also provide an overview of future areas of research using the SCD RoB tool in an effort to advance the science of single-case design research methods.
引用
收藏
页码:53 / 64
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Estimating the Impact of Design Standards on the Rigor of a Subset of Single-Case Research
    Shepley, Collin
    Zimmerman, Kathleen N.
    Ayres, Kevin M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DISABILITY POLICY STUDIES, 2021, 32 (02) : 108 - 118
  • [22] Introduction: International use of single-case research design in the schools INTRODUCTION
    Wilczynski, Susan M.
    Hu, Xioyi
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGY IN THE SCHOOLS, 2022, 59 (05) : 950 - 953
  • [23] THE SINGLE-CASE CLINICAL RESEARCH DESIGN IN DEVELOPMENTAL PERSPECTIVE - MAINSTREAM OR TANGENT
    ZIMBALIST, SE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EDUCATION FOR SOCIAL WORK, 1983, 19 (01): : 61 - 66
  • [25] Single-Case Design in Child Counseling Research: Implications for Counselor Education
    Ray, Dee C.
    Minton, Casey A. Barrio
    Schottelkorb, April A.
    Brown, April Garofano
    [J]. COUNSELOR EDUCATION AND SUPERVISION, 2010, 49 (03) : 193 - 208
  • [26] Evaluating a computerized training of executive functions with single-case experimental design methods
    Ponsioen, A.
    ten Brink, E.
    Prins, P.
    [J]. EUROPEAN CHILD & ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 2015, 24 : S45 - S46
  • [27] A NOTE ON ETHICS AND PATIENT CONSENT IN SINGLE-CASE DESIGN
    SVENSON, SE
    CHASSAN, JB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NERVOUS AND MENTAL DISEASE, 1967, 145 (03) : 206 - &
  • [28] QuantifyMe: An Automated Single-Case Experimental Design Platform
    Sano, Akane
    Taylor, Sara
    Ferguson, Craig
    Mohan, Akshay
    Picard, Rosalind W.
    [J]. WIRELESS MOBILE COMMUNICATION AND HEALTHCARE, 2018, 247 : 199 - 206
  • [29] Evaluating a psychodynamic psychotherapy in oncology practice: presentation of single-case design protocol
    Cannone, P.
    Bert, A. -L.
    Grimaldi, M. -A.
    Bacque, M. -F.
    [J]. PSYCHO-ONCOLOGIE, 2012, 6 (02) : 72 - 84
  • [30] Single-case design standards: An update and proposed upgrades
    Kratochwill, Thomas R.
    Horner, Robert H.
    Levin, Joel R.
    Machalicek, Wendy
    Ferron, John
    Johnson, Austin
    Collins, Tai
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 89 : 91 - 105