Development and applications of the single-case design risk of bias tool for evaluating single-case design research study reports

被引:63
|
作者
Reichow, Brian [1 ]
Barton, Erin E. [2 ]
Maggin, Daniel M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[2] Vanderbilt Univ, 221 Kirkland Hall, Nashville, TN 37235 USA
[3] Univ Illinois, Chicago, IL 60680 USA
关键词
Single-case design; Meta-analysis; Risk of bias; Systematic review; INTERVENTION; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ridd.2018.05.008
中图分类号
G76 [特殊教育];
学科分类号
040109 ;
摘要
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses can be a useful method for synthesizing evidence across multiple studies to draw conclusions about a research base. An important aspect of rigorous systematic reviews is an assessment of the study methods and potential biases impacting results or interpretations and conclusions of the primary studies. Single-case design (SCD) research has been a primary mechanism for identifying evidence-based practices across disciplines, but primarily in behavioral fields and special education. While the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool has been adapted for use in reviews of non-randomized studies, there is currently no guidance for evaluating SCD research. Hence, we developed a single case design risk of bias tool (SCD RoB) based on current conceptualizations of biases that might affect the validity of claims from single-case design research. We used the Cochrane risk of bias criteria and contemporary single-case design quality indicators and design standards to guide development. We describe the SCD RoB tool and two early applications of its use to demonstrate its application and provide initial validation. We also provide an overview of future areas of research using the SCD RoB tool in an effort to advance the science of single-case design research methods.
引用
收藏
页码:53 / 64
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Single-Case Research Design and Analysis: Counseling Applications
    Ray, Dee C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COUNSELING AND DEVELOPMENT, 2015, 93 (04): : 394 - 402
  • [2] Preregistration in Single-Case Design Research
    Johnson, Austin H.
    Cook, Bryan G.
    [J]. EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN, 2019, 86 (01) : 95 - 112
  • [3] Single-Case Intervention Research Design Standards
    Kratochwill, Thomas R.
    Hitchcock, John H.
    Horner, Robert H.
    Levin, Joel R.
    Odom, Samuel L.
    Rindskopf, David M.
    Shadish, William R.
    [J]. REMEDIAL AND SPECIAL EDUCATION, 2013, 34 (01) : 26 - 38
  • [4] Open Science and Single-Case Design Research
    Cook, Bryan G.
    Johnson, Austin H.
    Maggin, Daniel M.
    Therrien, William J.
    Barton, Erin E.
    Lloyd, John Wills
    Reichow, Brian
    Talbott, Elizabeth
    Travers, Jason C.
    [J]. REMEDIAL AND SPECIAL EDUCATION, 2022, 43 (05) : 359 - 369
  • [5] Analysis of Effect for Single-Case Design Research
    Gage, Nicholas A.
    Lewis, Timothy J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED SPORT PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 25 (01) : 46 - 60
  • [6] Design and analysis of single-case research.
    Chechile, RA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 42 (04) : 524 - 525
  • [7] Design and analysis of single-case research.
    Bakeman, R
    [J]. PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1998, 63 (02) : 217 - 219
  • [8] Hermeneutic single-case efficacy design
    Elliott, R
    [J]. PSYCHOTHERAPY RESEARCH, 2002, 12 (01) : 1 - 21
  • [9] The integrative single-case design in psychoneuroimmunology
    Schubert, Christian
    [J]. BRAIN BEHAVIOR AND IMMUNITY, 2024, 118 : 49 - 49
  • [10] A review of counseling research using single-case research design
    Brown, Cian L.
    Peltier, Corey
    Smarinsky, Evan C.
    Lewis, Olivia J.
    Lee, David Y.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COUNSELING AND DEVELOPMENT, 2024, 102 (03): : 334 - 349