Self-Monitoring Microbiological Criteria for the Assessment of Hygienic Procedures During Chicken Slaughtering

被引:5
|
作者
Dias, M. R. [1 ]
Dianin, K. C. S. [2 ]
Bersot, L. S. [2 ]
Nero, L. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Vicosa, Dept Vet, Vicosa, MG, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Parana, Dept Ciencias Vet, Setor Palotina, BR-85950000 Palotina, PR, Brazil
关键词
Chicken; self-monitoring; hygiene; slaughtering; processing; INDICATOR MICROORGANISMS; BROILER CARCASSES; POULTRY CARCASSES; ESCHERICHIA-COLI; SAMPLING METHODS; SALMONELLA SPP; VERIFICATION; QUALITY; PERFORMANCE; PATHOGENS;
D O I
10.1590/1806-9061-2016-0381
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Self-monitoring procedures are adopted by food industries to ensure the quality and safety of final products, considering hygiene and processing criteria. This study aimed to evaluate contamination in chicken processing, considering the microbiological criteria proposed by self-monitoring systems. Environmental samples from reception, slaughtering and processing were collected from three chicken slaughterhouses (S vertical bar 1, S vertical bar 2, S vertical bar 3), and subjected to microbiological analysis to enumerate hygiene indicators microorganisms: mesophilic aerobes, enterobacteriaceae, coliforms and Escherichia coli. The obtained counts were converted to log 10, compared by ANOVA (p<0.05) and self-monitoring microbiological criteria for each slaughterhouse were considered. In reception, the mean counts of hygiene indicator microorganisms in S vertical bar 3 were significantly higher than mean counts observed in S vertical bar 1 and S vertical bar 2 (p<0.05). During slaughtering, the chilling was enough to decrease the mean counts of all hygiene indicator microorganisms in S vertical bar 1, S vertical bar 2 and S vertical bar 3 (p<0.05). Based on self-monitoring criteria, in the first stages of slaughtering the facilities presented higher frequencies of chicken carcasses with counts above their respective reference values. S vertical bar 02 presented carcasses with higher counts after final washing, resulting in environmental samples with higher counts when compared to S vertical bar 1 and S vertical bar 3 (p<0.05). Even considering the high counts observed in the initial steps of chicken processing and slaughtering, the results indicated the efficacy of hygienic procedures in providing chicken carcasses and cuts with low microbiological contamination. Self-monitoring criteria supported these results, and the high levels of microbial contamination during the initial steps of slaughtering require subsequent antimicrobial hygienic procedures.
引用
收藏
页码:317 / 323
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] AN EVALUATION OF RESPONSE MAINTENANCE WITH SELF-MONITORING PROCEDURES
    CONNIS, RT
    DWINELL, MA
    [J]. BEHAVIORAL ENGINEERING, 1981, 7 (02): : 45 - 49
  • [2] REACTIVITY OF SELF-MONITORING PROCEDURES WITH RETARDED ADOLESCENTS
    ZEGIOB, L
    KLUKAS, N
    JUNGINGER, J
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MENTAL DEFICIENCY, 1978, 83 (02): : 156 - 163
  • [3] Technologies for Diabetes Self-Monitoring: A Scoping Review and Assessment Using the REASSURED Criteria
    Zafra-Tanaka, Jessica Hanae
    Beran, David
    Vetter, Beatrice
    Sampath, Rangarajan
    Bernabe-Ortiz, Antonio
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DIABETES SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 16 (04): : 962 - 970
  • [4] Self-monitoring in the assessment of eating disorders
    Wilson, GT
    Vitousek, KM
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 1999, 11 (04) : 480 - 489
  • [5] Psychometric considerations in self-monitoring assessment
    Jackson, JL
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 1999, 11 (04) : 439 - 447
  • [6] Self-monitoring and the assessment of binge eating
    Latner, JD
    Wilson, GT
    [J]. BEHAVIOR THERAPY, 2002, 33 (03) : 465 - 477
  • [7] An overview of self-monitoring research in assessment and treatment
    Korotitsch, WJ
    Nelson-Gray, RO
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 1999, 11 (04) : 415 - 425
  • [8] Self-monitoring as an assessment strategy in behavioral medicine
    Barton, KA
    Blanchard, EB
    Veazey, C
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 1999, 11 (04) : 490 - 497
  • [9] RELIABILITY AND CONTROLLING EFFECTS OF 3 PROCEDURES FOR SELF-MONITORING SMOKING
    FREDERIKSEN, LW
    EPSTEIN, LH
    KOSEVSKY, BP
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL RECORD, 1975, 25 (02): : 255 - 264
  • [10] Exploring the divergence between self-assessment and self-monitoring
    Kevin W. Eva
    Glenn Regehr
    [J]. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 2011, 16 : 311 - 329