Skin toxicity in BRAF(V600) mutated metastatic cutaneous melanoma patients treated with vemurafenib

被引:3
|
作者
Nowara, Elzbieta [1 ]
Huszno, Joanna [1 ]
Slomian, Grzegorz [2 ]
Nieckula, Jaroslaw [1 ]
机构
[1] Canc Ctr & Inst Oncol, Clin & Expt Oncol Dept, Gliwice Branch, 15 Wybrzeze Armii Krajowej St, PL-44100 Gliwice, Poland
[2] Voivodeship Specialized Hosp, Oncol Ward, Independent Publ Hlth Care Unit, Rybnik, Poland
来源
POSTEPY DERMATOLOGII I ALERGOLOGII | 2016年 / 33卷 / 01期
关键词
cutaneous melanoma; BRAF inhibitor; vemurafenib; skin toxicity; OPEN-LABEL; MULTICENTER; SURVIVAL; PHASE-3; SAFETY;
D O I
10.5114/pdia.2015.48045
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Introduction: The use of orally available BRAF kinase inhibitor - vemurafenib is associated with numerous adverse skin reactions. Aim: To assess the safety and early side effects of vemurafenib treatment in the unselected group of patients treated at the outpatient clinic, in particular the assessment of the incidence of skin cancer. Material and methods: We carried out a systematic study of patients (pts) treated with vemurafenib. Skin toxicity during vemurafenib therapy was analyzed. Toxicity was determined on the basis of the toxicity scale CTCAE, version 4.0. Results: The most common cutaneous side effects were hyperkeratotic perifollicular rash (69%) and photosensitivity (15%). Skin rash developed more frequently in the first month of treatment. Squamous cell carcinoma occurred in 38% of patients. Patients with skin cancer development during vemurafenib therapy had non-significantly longer overall survival (OS) than patients without skin cancer, p = 0.4. Skin cancer developed more often in women than in men (60% vs. 25%), p = 0.249. It was detected only in patients with normal weight compared to overweight patients (55% vs. 0), p = 0.09. The median OS was 26 months and median OS from the time of distant metastases diagnosis was 9.8 months. In patients with a low body mass index, shorter OS was observed, p = 0.09. Conclusions: The incidence of squamous cell carcinoma was high (38%). This study has many limitations mostly due to a small group of patients. That is why the results should be taken into consideration with caution. The proper symptomatic treatment in cooperation with dermatologists allows to continue the vemurafenib therapy.
引用
收藏
页码:52 / 56
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Combined BRAF and MEK Inhibition in Melanoma with BRAF V600 Mutations
    Flaherty, Keith T.
    Infante, Jeffery R.
    Daud, Adil
    Gonzalez, Rene
    Kefford, Richard F.
    Sosman, Jeffrey
    Hamid, Omid
    Schuchter, Lynn
    Cebon, Jonathan
    Ibrahim, Nageatte
    Kudchadkar, Ragini
    Burris, Howard A., III
    Falchook, Gerald
    Algazi, Alain
    Lewis, Karl
    Long, Georgina V.
    Puzanov, Igor
    Lebowitz, Peter
    Singh, Ajay
    Little, Shonda
    Sun, Peng
    Allred, Alicia
    Ouellet, Daniele
    Kim, Kevin B.
    Patel, Kiran
    Weber, Jeffrey
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2012, 367 (18): : 1694 - 1703
  • [42] Vemurafenib for the Treatment of Locally Advanced or Metastatic BRAF V600 Mutation-Positive Malignant Melanoma: A NICE Single Technology Appraisal
    Beale, Sophie
    Dickson, Rumona
    Bagust, Adrian
    Blundell, Michaela
    Dundar, Yenal
    Boland, Angela
    Marshall, Ernie
    Plummer, Ruth
    Proudlove, Chris
    [J]. PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2013, 31 (12) : 1121 - 1129
  • [43] COST EFFECTIVE ONLY AT A ZERO PRICE: A REAL-TIME SCENARIO IN UNTREATED BRAF V600 MUTATED METASTATIC MELANOMA?
    Borissov, B. N.
    Hanna, E.
    Auquier, P.
    Dorey, J.
    Toumi, M.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2018, 21 : S46 - S46
  • [44] Comparison of different testing methods for detection of BRAF V600 mutation in metastatic melanoma
    Hernandez-Losa, J.
    Ruano, Y.
    Trigo Sanchez, I.
    Somoza, R.
    Ferrer, B.
    Garcia Verdes-Montenegro, F.
    Urech, M.
    Ramon Y Cajal, S.
    Rios Martin, J. J.
    Rodriguez-Peralto, J. L.
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2018, 29
  • [45] CA184-161: A phase I/II trial of vemurafenib and ipilimumab in patients with BRAF V600 mutation-positive metastatic melanoma.
    Ribas, Antoni
    Hodi, F. Stephen
    Kurland, John F.
    Shahabi, Vafa
    Francis, Stephen
    Konto, Cyril
    Joe, Andrew K.
    Lainas, Ioannis
    Wolchok, Jedd D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 30 (15)
  • [46] T-cell therapy in combination with vemurafenib in BRAF mutated metastatic melanoma patients
    Borch, T. H.
    Andersen, R.
    Rana, M. A. H.
    Kongsted, P.
    Pedersen, M.
    Nielsen, M.
    Kjeldsen, J. W.
    Kverneland, A.
    Met, O.
    Donia, M.
    Svane, I. M.
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2017, 28 : 29 - 29
  • [47] BRAF V600 mutations and pathological features in Japanese melanoma
    Yamazaki, N.
    Tanaka, R.
    Tsutsumida, A.
    Namikawa, K.
    Eguchi, H.
    Omata, W.
    Oashi, K.
    Tsuta, K.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2013, 49 : S874 - S874
  • [48] Copper suppression as cancer therapy: the rationale for copper chelating agents in BRAF(V600) mutated melanoma
    Sammons, Sarah
    Brady, Donita
    Vahdat, Linda
    Salama, April K. S.
    [J]. MELANOMA MANAGEMENT, 2016, 3 (03) : 207 - 216
  • [49] Vemurafenib in Melanoma with BRAF V600E Mutation
    Dalle, Stephane
    Poulalhon, Nicolas
    Thomas, Luc
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2011, 365 (15): : 1448 - 1449
  • [50] Safety of vemurafenib in patients with BRAFV600 mutated metastatic melanoma: the Spanish experience
    A. M. Arance
    A. Berrocal
    J. A. Lopez-Martin
    L. de la Cruz-Merino
    V. Soriano
    S. Martín Algarra
    L. Alonso
    P. Cerezuela
    B. La Orden
    E. Espinosa
    [J]. Clinical and Translational Oncology, 2016, 18 : 1147 - 1157