Adding Centralized Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Data Collection to an Established International Clinical Outcomes Registry

被引:5
|
作者
Cusatis, Rachel [1 ]
Flynn, Kathryn E. [1 ]
Vasu, Sumithira [2 ]
Pidala, Joseph [3 ]
Muffly, Lori [4 ]
Uberti, Joseph [5 ]
Tamari, Roni [6 ]
Mattila, Deborah [7 ]
Mussetter, Alisha [7 ]
Bruzauskas, Ruta [1 ,8 ]
Chen, Min [1 ]
Leckrone, Erin [7 ]
Myers, Judith [1 ]
Mau, Lih-Wen [7 ]
Rizzo, J. Douglas [1 ]
Saber, Wael [1 ]
Horowitz, Mary [1 ]
Lee, Stephanie J. [1 ,9 ]
Burns, Linda J. [7 ,10 ]
Shaw, Bronwen E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Coll Wisconsin, Dept Med, CIBMTR Ctr Int Blood & Marrow Transplant Res, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, Wexner Med Ctr, James Canc Hosp & Solove Res Inst, Columbus, OH USA
[3] H Lee Moffitt Canc Ctr & Res Inst, Tampa, FL USA
[4] Stanford Univ, Div Blood & Marrow Transplantat, Stanford, CA USA
[5] Karmanos Canc Inst, Detroit, MI USA
[6] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10021 USA
[7] Natl Marrow Donor Program Be Match, CIBMTR Ctr Int Blood & Marrow Transplant Res, Minneapolis, MN USA
[8] Med Coll Wisconsin, Inst Hlth & Equ, Div Biostat, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
[9] Fred Hutchinson Canc Res Ctr, 1124 Columbia St, Seattle, WA 98104 USA
[10] Ctr Int Blood & Marrow Transplant Res, Milwaukee, WI USA
来源
TRANSPLANTATION AND CELLULAR THERAPY | 2022年 / 28卷 / 02期
关键词
Patient-reported outcomes; Clinical outcomes registry; Hematopoietic cell transplanation; Cellular therapy; Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS); FUNCTION ITEM BANK; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; TRANSPLANTATION; SYSTEM; FEASIBILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jtct.2021.10.016
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The importance of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in cellular therapies, including hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is highlighted in this study. Longitudinal collection of PROs in a registry is recommended for several reasons, yet to date, PROs are not routinely collected from HCT patients to augment clinical registry data. The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility of electronic PRO data collection by a national clinical outcomes registry, by assessing differences between who does and does not report PROs. We conducted a cross-sectional pilot collection of PROs from HCT recipients after treatment using computer-adapted tests from the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS). We implemented centralized data collection through the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) among patients who underwent HCT for myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), were at least 6 months post-HCT, and spoke English or Spanish. The main objective was identifying patient, disease, and transplant-related differences associated with completion of electronic PROs. Patients were excluded from analysis if they were determined to be ineligible (deceased, did not speak English or Spanish, refused to be contacted by the CIBMTR). A total of 163 patients were contacted and potentially eligible to participate; of these, 92 (56%) enrolled and 89 (55%) completed the PRO assessment. The most frequent reason for incomplete surveys was inability to contact patients (n = 88), followed by declining to participate in the study (n = 37). There were no sociodemographic or age differences between those who completed the PRO survey (n = 89) and eligible nonresponders (n = 155). Patient scores were within 3 points of the US average of 50 for all symptoms and functioning except physical functioning. Responders and nonresponders did not exhibit meaningfully different sociodemographic characteristics. Difficulty contacting patients posed the greatest barrier and also provided the greatest opportunity for improvement. Once enrolled, survey completion was high. These results support standardizing centralized PRO data collection through the CIBMTR registry. (c) 2021 The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:112.e1 / 112.e9
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Siteless study for feasibility of electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) collection system in oncology
    Kachi, Kenta
    Komori, Shun
    Shiko, Yuki
    Kawaguchi, Takashi
    Miyaji, Tempei
    Yamaguchi, Takuhiro
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2021, 32 : S288 - S288
  • [42] Integrating patient-reported outcomes data into the electronic health record.
    Bosch, Brandon
    Hartman, Scott
    Caldarello, Lauren
    Denny, Diane
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 36 (30)
  • [43] Feasibility and acceptability of patient-reported outcomes data collection for clinical care following breast reconstruction.
    Pusic, Andrea
    Klassen, Anne
    Scott, Amie
    Cano, Stefan
    Shouery, Marwan
    Basch, Ethan M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 30 (15)
  • [44] Using Electronic Data Collection Platforms to Assess Complementary and Integrative Health Patient-Reported Outcomes: Feasibility Project
    Haun, Jolie N.
    Alman, Amy C.
    Melillo, Christine
    Standifer, Maisha
    McMahon-Grenz, Julie
    Shin, Marlena
    Lapcevic, W. A.
    Patel, Nitin
    Elwy, A. Rani
    [J]. JMIR MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2020, 8 (06)
  • [45] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures and Clinical Outcomes in Children with Foregut Anomalies
    Sreeram, Isabel I.
    ten Kate, Chantal A.
    van Rosmalen, Joost
    Schnater, Johannes M.
    Gischler, Saskia J.
    Wijnen, Rene M. H.
    IJsselstijn, Hanneke
    Rietman, Andre B.
    [J]. CHILDREN-BASEL, 2021, 8 (07):
  • [46] Patient responses to weekly electronic patient-reported outcomes
    Dent, D'Ambra
    Ingram, Stacey A.
    Lawhon, Valerie
    Jamy, Omer
    Giri, Smith
    Scott, Julie
    Still, Nadia
    Wujcik, Debra
    Rocque, Gabrielle Betty
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 39 (28)
  • [47] FACTORS INFLUENCING ACCEPTANCE AND PERSISTENCE OF ELECTRONIC PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES COLLECTION IN A REAL-WORLD CLINICAL SETTING
    Biliavska, I.
    Lenguerrand, E.
    Tobias, J.
    Hamann, P.
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2023, 82 : 498 - 498
  • [48] Use of SMS in Obtaining Patient-Reported Outcomes in the Australian Stroke Clinical Registry
    Morrison, Julie
    Hancock, Shaun
    Carter, Helen
    Lester, Marcus
    Moss, Karen Barclay
    Kim, Joosup
    Kilkenny, Monique
    Dewey, Helen
    Grimley, Rohan
    Middleton, Sandy
    Lannin, Natasha A.
    Cadilhac, Dominique A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STROKE, 2023, 18 (02) : 61 - 61
  • [49] AN ELECTRONIC PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURES SYSTEM IN UK CHIROPRACTIC PRACTICES: A FEASIBILITY STUDY OF ROUTINE COLLECTION OF OUTCOMES AND COSTS
    Newell, Dave
    Diment, Emily
    Bolton, Jenni E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANIPULATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2016, 39 (01) : 31 - 41
  • [50] Patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice
    Dobrozsi, Sarah
    Panepinto, Julie
    [J]. HEMATOLOGY-AMERICAN SOCIETY OF HEMATOLOGY EDUCATION PROGRAM, 2015, : 501 - 506