Adding Centralized Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Data Collection to an Established International Clinical Outcomes Registry

被引:5
|
作者
Cusatis, Rachel [1 ]
Flynn, Kathryn E. [1 ]
Vasu, Sumithira [2 ]
Pidala, Joseph [3 ]
Muffly, Lori [4 ]
Uberti, Joseph [5 ]
Tamari, Roni [6 ]
Mattila, Deborah [7 ]
Mussetter, Alisha [7 ]
Bruzauskas, Ruta [1 ,8 ]
Chen, Min [1 ]
Leckrone, Erin [7 ]
Myers, Judith [1 ]
Mau, Lih-Wen [7 ]
Rizzo, J. Douglas [1 ]
Saber, Wael [1 ]
Horowitz, Mary [1 ]
Lee, Stephanie J. [1 ,9 ]
Burns, Linda J. [7 ,10 ]
Shaw, Bronwen E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Coll Wisconsin, Dept Med, CIBMTR Ctr Int Blood & Marrow Transplant Res, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, Wexner Med Ctr, James Canc Hosp & Solove Res Inst, Columbus, OH USA
[3] H Lee Moffitt Canc Ctr & Res Inst, Tampa, FL USA
[4] Stanford Univ, Div Blood & Marrow Transplantat, Stanford, CA USA
[5] Karmanos Canc Inst, Detroit, MI USA
[6] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10021 USA
[7] Natl Marrow Donor Program Be Match, CIBMTR Ctr Int Blood & Marrow Transplant Res, Minneapolis, MN USA
[8] Med Coll Wisconsin, Inst Hlth & Equ, Div Biostat, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
[9] Fred Hutchinson Canc Res Ctr, 1124 Columbia St, Seattle, WA 98104 USA
[10] Ctr Int Blood & Marrow Transplant Res, Milwaukee, WI USA
来源
TRANSPLANTATION AND CELLULAR THERAPY | 2022年 / 28卷 / 02期
关键词
Patient-reported outcomes; Clinical outcomes registry; Hematopoietic cell transplanation; Cellular therapy; Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS); FUNCTION ITEM BANK; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; TRANSPLANTATION; SYSTEM; FEASIBILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jtct.2021.10.016
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The importance of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in cellular therapies, including hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is highlighted in this study. Longitudinal collection of PROs in a registry is recommended for several reasons, yet to date, PROs are not routinely collected from HCT patients to augment clinical registry data. The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility of electronic PRO data collection by a national clinical outcomes registry, by assessing differences between who does and does not report PROs. We conducted a cross-sectional pilot collection of PROs from HCT recipients after treatment using computer-adapted tests from the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS). We implemented centralized data collection through the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) among patients who underwent HCT for myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), were at least 6 months post-HCT, and spoke English or Spanish. The main objective was identifying patient, disease, and transplant-related differences associated with completion of electronic PROs. Patients were excluded from analysis if they were determined to be ineligible (deceased, did not speak English or Spanish, refused to be contacted by the CIBMTR). A total of 163 patients were contacted and potentially eligible to participate; of these, 92 (56%) enrolled and 89 (55%) completed the PRO assessment. The most frequent reason for incomplete surveys was inability to contact patients (n = 88), followed by declining to participate in the study (n = 37). There were no sociodemographic or age differences between those who completed the PRO survey (n = 89) and eligible nonresponders (n = 155). Patient scores were within 3 points of the US average of 50 for all symptoms and functioning except physical functioning. Responders and nonresponders did not exhibit meaningfully different sociodemographic characteristics. Difficulty contacting patients posed the greatest barrier and also provided the greatest opportunity for improvement. Once enrolled, survey completion was high. These results support standardizing centralized PRO data collection through the CIBMTR registry. (c) 2021 The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:112.e1 / 112.e9
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Complementing clinical cancer registry data with patient reported outcomes: A feasibility study on routine electronic patient-reported outcome assessment for the Austrian Myelome Registry
    Sztankay, Monika
    Neppl, Lucia
    Wintner, Lisa M.
    Loth, Fanny L.
    Willenbacher, Wolfgang
    Weger, Roman
    Weyrer, Walpurga
    Steurer, Michael
    Rumpold, Gerhard
    Holzner, Bernhard
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, 2019, 28 (06)
  • [2] Centralized Patient-Reported Outcome Data Collection in Transplantation Is Feasible and Clinically Meaningful
    Shaw, Bronwen E.
    Brazauskas, Ruta
    Millard, Heather R.
    Fonstad, Rachel
    Flynn, Kathryn E.
    Abernethy, Amy
    Vogel, Jenny
    Petroske, Charney
    Mattila, Deborah
    Drexler, Rebecca
    Lee, Stephanie J.
    Horowitz, Mary M.
    Rizzo, J. Douglas
    [J]. CANCER, 2017, 123 (23) : 4687 - 4700
  • [3] Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Collection Systems in Orthopaedic Clinical Practice
    Lizzio, Vincent A.
    Dekhne, Mihir S.
    Makhni, Eric C.
    [J]. JBJS REVIEWS, 2019, 7 (07)
  • [4] Feasibility test of a UK-scalable electronic system for regular collection of patient-reported outcome measures and linkage with clinical cancer registry data: The electronic Patient-reported Outcomes from Cancer Survivors (ePOCS) system
    Laura Ashley
    Helen Jones
    David Forman
    Alex Newsham
    Julia Brown
    Amy Downing
    Galina Velikova
    Penny Wright
    [J]. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 11
  • [5] Feasibility test of a UK-scalable electronic system for regular collection of patient-reported outcome measures and linkage with clinical cancer registry data: The electronic Patient-reported Outcomes from Cancer Survivors (ePOCS) system
    Ashley, Laura
    Jones, Helen
    Forman, David
    Newsham, Alex
    Brown, Julia
    Downing, Amy
    Velikova, Galina
    Wright, Penny
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2011, 11
  • [6] Using a Web-Based Data Collection Platform to Implement an Effective Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Registry
    Lizzio, Vincent A.
    Gulledge, Caleb M.
    Meta, Fabien
    Franovic, Sreten
    Makhni, Eric C.
    [J]. ARTHROSCOPY TECHNIQUES, 2019, 8 (06): : E535 - E539
  • [7] Patient-Reported Outcomes in Rheumatoid ArthritisAssessing the Equivalence of Electronic and Paper Data Collection
    Brian Tiplady
    Kirsteen Goodman
    Geraldine Cummings
    Dawn Lyle
    Robert Carrington
    Clare Battersby
    Stuart H. Ralston
    [J]. The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 2010, 3 : 133 - 143
  • [8] Integrating Patient Reported Outcomes With Clinical Cancer Registry Data: A Feasibility Study of the Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes From Cancer Survivors (ePOCS) System
    Ashley, Laura
    Jones, Helen
    Thomas, James
    Newsham, Alex
    Downing, Amy
    Morris, Eva
    Brown, Julia
    Velikova, Galina
    Forman, David
    Wright, Penny
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2013, 15 (10) : 178 - 196
  • [9] ELECTRONIC COLLECTION OF PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURES IN DERMATOLOGY TRIALS
    Marszewska, J.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2024, 27 (06) : S341 - S341
  • [10] Electronic Collection of Multilingual Patient-Reported Outcomes across Europe
    Soto-Rey, I.
    Rehr, M.
    Bruland, P.
    Zeidler, C.
    Riepe, C.
    Steinke, S.
    Staender, S.
    Dugas, M.
    Storck, M.
    [J]. METHODS OF INFORMATION IN MEDICINE, 2018, 57 : E107 - E114