Impact of sensory interventions on the quality of life of long-term care residents: a scoping review

被引:8
|
作者
Backman, Chantal [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Demery-Varin, Melissa [1 ]
Cho-Young, Danielle [1 ]
Crick, Michelle [1 ]
Squires, Janet [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ottawa, Sch Nursing, Fac Hlth Sci, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[2] Ottawa Hosp Res Inst, Clin Epidemiol Program, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[3] Bruyere Res Inst, Care Elderly, Ottawa, ON, Canada
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2021年 / 11卷 / 03期
关键词
general medicine (see internal medicine); health services administration & management; quality in health care; geriatric medicine; NURSING-HOME RESIDENTS; BRIGHT LIGHT TREATMENT; OLDER-ADULTS; REST-ACTIVITY; VISUAL IMPAIRMENT; THERAPEUTIC TOUCH; HEALING TOUCH; NAMASTE CARE; DEMENTIA; SLEEP;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042466
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction and purpose Residents in long-term care exhibit diminishing senses (hearing, sight, taste, smell or touch). The purpose of this study was to examine the available literature on the impact of sensory interventions on the quality of life of residents living in long-term care settings. Methods We conducted a mixed-methods scoping review using Arksey and O'Malley's framework. Seven databases (Medline (Ovid), PubMed (non-Medline-Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCO), Embase (Ovid), Ageline, PsycINFO (Ovid), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials until 1 December 2020) were searched. Two reviewers independently screened the studies for sensory interventions using a two-step process. Eligible studies underwent data extraction and results were synthesised descriptively. Results We screened 5551 titles and abstracts. A total of 52 articles met our inclusion criteria. Some interventions involved only one sense: hearing (n=3), sight (n=12), smell (n=4) and touch (n=15). Other interventions involved multiple senses (n=18). We grouped the interventions into 16 categories (music programmes, environmental white noise, bright light interventions, visual stimulations, olfactory stimulations, massages, therapeutic touch, tactile stimulations, physical activity plus night-time programmes, pet therapies, various stimuli interventions, Snoezelen rooms, motor and multisensory based strategies, Namaste care, environmental modifications and expressive touch activities). Conclusion This preliminary review summarised some of the available sensory interventions that will help inform a series of future systematic reviews on each of the specific interventions. The evidence-based knowledge for sensory interventions will also inform a future audit programme for assessing the presence of sensory interventions in long-term care.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Social integration and loneliness among long-term care home residents: protocol for a scoping review
    Bethell, Jennifer
    Babineau, Jessica
    Iaboni, Andrea
    Green, Robin
    Cuaresma-Canlas, Rachelle
    Karunananthan, Roobika
    Schon, Barbara
    Schon, Denise
    McGilton, Katherine S.
    BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (12):
  • [32] Scoping review of physical rehabilitation interventions in long-term care: protocol for tools, models of delivery, outcomes and quality indicators
    McArthur, Caitlin
    Gibbs, Jenna
    Papaioannou, Alexandra
    Hirdes, John
    Milligan, James
    Berg, Katherine
    Giangregorio, Lora
    BMJ OPEN, 2015, 5 (06):
  • [33] Strategies for the implementation of palliative care education and organizational interventions in long-term care facilities: A scoping review
    Moore, Danni Collingridge
    Payne, Sheila
    Van den Block, Lieve
    Ling, Julie
    Froggatt, Katherine
    Gatsolaeva, Yuliana
    Honinx, Elisabeth
    Pivodic, Lara
    Miranda, Rose
    Onwuteaka-Philipsen, Bregje D.
    van Hout, Hein
    Pasman, H. Roeline W.
    Oosterveld-Vlug, Mariska
    Ten Koppel, Maud
    Piers, Ruth
    Van Den Noortgate, Nele
    Engels, Yvonne
    Vernooij-Dassen, Myrra
    Hockley, Jo
    Szczerbinska, Katarzyna
    Kylanen, Marika
    Gambassi, Giovanni
    Pautex, Sophie
    Bassal, Catherine
    Deliens, Luc
    Smets, Tinne
    Adang, Eddy
    Andreasen, Paula
    Baranska, Ilona
    Finne-Soveri, Harriet
    Hammar, Teija
    Heikkila, Rauha
    Kijowska, Violetta
    Leppaaho, Suvi
    Mammarella, Federica
    Mercuri, Martina
    Kuitunen-Kaija, Outi
    Pac, Agnieszka
    de Paula, Emilie Morgan
    Rossi, Paola
    Segat, Ivan
    Sowerby, Eleanor
    van der Steen, Jenny T.
    Stodolska, Agata
    Tanghe, Marc
    Wichmann, Anne B.
    PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2020, 34 (05) : 558 - 570
  • [34] Meaning in Life The Perspective of Long-Term Care Residents
    Welsh, Darlene
    Moore, Sharon L.
    Getzlaf, Beverley A.
    RESEARCH IN GERONTOLOGICAL NURSING, 2012, 5 (03) : 185 - 194
  • [35] The impact of intergenerational programs on long-term care residents
    Bressler, J
    GERONTOLOGIST, 2001, 41 : 307 - 307
  • [36] THE IMPACT OF REGULATING PRIVATE LONG-TERM CARE FACILITIES ON THE QUALITY OF CARE PROVIDED TO OLDER RESIDENTS
    Bravo, G.
    Dubois, M.
    Dubuc, N.
    Demers, L.
    Painter, K.
    Lestage, C.
    GERONTOLOGIST, 2013, 53 : 347 - 347
  • [37] The use of narrative approaches to improve quality of care in the long-term care setting: a scoping review
    Kalisvaart, Mirjam
    Heerings, Marjolijn
    Oldenhof, Lieke
    Pot, Anne Margriet
    INTERNATIONAL PSYCHOGERIATRICS, 2024, 36 : 60 - 61
  • [38] Art Activities in Long-Term Care: A Scoping Review
    Durocher, Evelyne
    Njelesani, Janet
    Crosby, Emily
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY-REVUE CANADIENNE D ERGOTHERAPIE, 2022, 89 (01): : 36 - 43
  • [39] QUALITY IMPROVEMENT INTERVENTIONS IN LONG-TERM CARE FACILITIES: A REVIEW OF INTERVENTIONAL STUDIES
    Suzuki, M.
    Igarashi, A.
    Takehara, K.
    Takai, Y.
    Yamamoto-Mitani, N.
    GERONTOLOGIST, 2014, 54 : 183 - 183
  • [40] A SCOPING REVIEW FOR PERSON-FOCUSED FALL PREVENTIVE INTERVENTIONS IN LONG-TERM CARE FACILITIES
    Jung, Wonkyung
    Lim, Sungwon
    Thompson, Hilaire
    INNOVATION IN AGING, 2023, 7 : 699 - 700