Automatic Discourse Parsing of Arabic Texts: the Case of Attachments

被引:0
|
作者
Bettaieb, Hela [1 ]
Boujelben, Ines [2 ]
Keskes, Iskandar [3 ]
机构
[1] Miracl Lab Sfax, FSEGS, Fac Econ & Management Sfax, Sfax, Tunisia
[2] Gabes Univ, Miracl Lab Sfax, Gabes, Tunisia
[3] Gafsa Univ, Miracl Lab Sfax, ANLP Res Grp, Gafsa, Tunisia
关键词
Discourse Attachments; Discourse relations; Discourse analysis; Segmented discourse Reresentation Theory (SDRT); Elementary Discourse Units (EDUs);
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
The study of the structure of the Arabic texts is considered as a modern concern. Its importance lies in its ability to determine the semantic and rhetorical meaning of the discourse. Through a coherent structural graph consisting of text units and rhetorical relations linking them. It also highlights its importance by employing it in several applications from the natural language processing field, for example the question/answer system, the automatic translation and the automated text summary system and the Acquisition of the Arabic terminology. The rhetorical analysis is based on three important pillars. The first pillar is to divide the text into text units. The second pillar is to look for structural links between different text units. The third pillar connects these units to each other through rhetorical relations with semantic meanings. In this context, our task of the automatic construction of discourse structure: the case of attachments falls within the third pillar of rhetorical analysis. This approach of rhetorical analysis is based on the segmented discourse representation theory (SDRT) within our proposed method and on the classifier RandomForest. Our method was tested on the corpus of test, where the F-measure was 73%..
引用
收藏
页码:128 / 132
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Representation learning in discourse parsing: A survey
    Wei Song
    LiZhen Liu
    [J]. Science China Technological Sciences, 2020, 63 : 1921 - 1946
  • [42] Learning Recursive Segments for Discourse Parsing
    Afantenos, Stergos D.
    Denis, Pascal
    Muller, Philippe
    Danlos, Laurence
    [J]. LREC 2010 - SEVENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON LANGUAGE RESOURCES AND EVALUATION, 2010,
  • [43] PARSING IN DISCOURSE - CONTEXT EFFECTS AND THEIR LIMITS
    BRITT, MA
    PERFETTI, CA
    GARROD, S
    RAYNER, K
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 1992, 31 (03) : 293 - 314
  • [44] The theory and practice of discourse parsing and summarization
    Hahn, U
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS, 2002, 28 (01) : 81 - 83
  • [45] Application of Automatic Grammar Parsing in Technology Source Acquisition: The Case of Biotechnology
    Xie Xinzhou
    Wang Qiang
    [J]. APPLICATION AND BEST PRACTICE OF COMPETITIVE TECHNICAL INTELLIGENCE, 2010, : 47 - +
  • [46] Modeling Discourse Cohesion for Discourse Parsing via Memory Network
    Jia, Yanyan
    Ye, Yuan
    Feng, Yansong
    Lai, Yuxuan
    Yan, Rui
    Zhao, Dongyan
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 56TH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS, VOL 2, 2018, : 438 - 443
  • [47] Representation learning in discourse parsing: A survey
    SONG Wei
    LIU LiZhen
    [J]. Science China Technological Sciences, 2020, (10) : 1921 - 1946
  • [48] Representation learning in discourse parsing: A survey
    Song Wei
    Liu LiZhen
    [J]. SCIENCE CHINA-TECHNOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2020, 63 (10) : 1921 - 1946
  • [49] Representation learning in discourse parsing: A survey
    SONG Wei
    LIU LiZhen
    [J]. Science China(Technological Sciences)., 2020, 63 (10) - 1946
  • [50] Discourse Representation Parsing for Sentences and Documents
    Liu, Jiangming
    Cohen, Shay B.
    Lapata, Mirella
    [J]. 57TH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS (ACL 2019), 2019, : 6248 - 6262