A response surface modelling approach for multi-objective optimization of composite plates

被引:5
|
作者
Kalita, Kanak [1 ]
Dey, Partha [2 ]
Joshi, Milan [3 ]
Halder, Salil [4 ]
机构
[1] Vel Tech Rangarajan Dr Sagunthala R&D Inst Sci &, Dept Mech Engn, Avadi 600062, India
[2] Acad Technol, Dept Mech Engn, Adisaptagram 712121, Hooghly, India
[3] SVKMs NMIMS Mukesh Patel Sch Technol Management &, Dept Appl Sci & Humanities, Shirpur 425405, India
[4] Indian Inst Engn Sci & Technol, Dept Aerosp Engn & Appl Mech, Howrah 711103, India
来源
STEEL AND COMPOSITE STRUCTURES | 2019年 / 32卷 / 04期
关键词
FE-surrogate; metamodel; multi-objective genetic algorithm (MOGA); multi-objective particle swarm optimization (MOPSO); pareto front; RELIABILITY-ANALYSIS; GENETIC ALGORITHM; OPTIMUM DESIGN; IDENTIFICATION;
D O I
10.12989/scs.2019.32.4.455
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Despite the rapid advancement in computing resources, many real-life design and optimization problems in structural engineering involve huge computation costs. To counter such challenges, approximate models are often used as surrogates for the highly accurate but time intensive finite element models. In this paper, surrogates for first-order shear deformation based finite element models are built using a polynomial regression approach. Using statistical techniques like Box-Cox transformation and ANOVA, the effectiveness of the surrogates is enhanced. The accuracy of the surrogate models is evaluated using statistical metrics like, R-2, R-adj(2), R-pred(2) and Q(F3)(2). By combining these surrogates with nature-inspired multi-criteria decision-making algorithms, namely multi-objective genetic algorithm (MOGA) and multi-objective particle swarm optimization (MOPSO), the optimal combination of various design variables to simultaneously maximize fundamental frequency and frequency separation is predicted. It is seen that the proposed approach is simple, effective and good at inexpensively producing a host of optimal solutions.
引用
收藏
页码:455 / 466
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Modelling surface quality of abrasive water jet processing at multi-objective optimization criteria
    Ahmed S. Elmesalamy
    Production Engineering, 2020, 14 : 717 - 732
  • [32] Modelling surface quality of abrasive water jet processing at multi-objective optimization criteria
    Elmesalamy, Ahmed S.
    PRODUCTION ENGINEERING-RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2020, 14 (5-6): : 717 - 732
  • [33] Stochastic multi-objective optimization of a viscoelastic composite plate
    Teters, GA
    Kregers, AF
    Melbardis, YG
    MECHANICS OF COMPOSITE MATERIALS, 1995, 31 (03) : 266 - 270
  • [34] Multi-objective structural optimization of a HAWT composite blade
    Dal Monte, Andrea
    Castelli, Marco Raciti
    Benini, Ernesto
    COMPOSITE STRUCTURES, 2013, 106 : 362 - 373
  • [35] Multi-objective optimization of composite structures. A review
    Teters, GA
    Kregers, AF
    MECHANICS OF COMPOSITE MATERIALS, 1996, 32 (03) : 252 - 260
  • [36] Multi-objective optimization of the SPS hatch cover based on response surface method
    Tian A.-L.
    Wei Z.
    Zhang H.-Y.
    Ma Q.-Y.
    Yao P.
    Chuan Bo Li Xue/Journal of Ship Mechanics, 2021, 25 (04): : 502 - 508
  • [37] Response Surface Mapping and Multi-Objective Optimization of Tilting Pad Bearing Designs
    Branagan, Michael
    Morgan, Neal
    Weaver, Brian
    Wood, Houston
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME TURBO EXPO: TURBINE TECHNICAL CONFERENCE AND EXPOSITION, 2017, VOL 7A, 2017,
  • [38] Multi-objective optimization of impact crusher rotor based on response surface methodology
    Zhao, Li-Mei, 1600, Bentham Science Publishers B.V., P.O. Box 294, Bussum, 1400 AG, Netherlands (08):
  • [39] Multi-objective optimization of quality in laser cutting based on response surface model
    Hao Huijuan
    Wang Maoli
    Hao Fengqi
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER AND INFORMATION APPLICATIONS (ICCIA 2012), 2012, : 1271 - 1274
  • [40] Multi-Objective Optimization of Microstructure of Gravure Cell Based on Response Surface Method
    Wu, Shuang
    Xing, Jiefang
    Dong, Ling
    Zhu, Honjuan
    PROCESSES, 2021, 9 (02) : 1 - 15