Quantifying Environmental Burdens of Plasters Based on Natural vs. Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD) Gypsum

被引:7
|
作者
Baran, Edyta [1 ]
Czernik, Sebastian [1 ]
Hynowski, Mariusz [1 ]
Michalowski, Bartosz [1 ]
Piasecki, Michal [2 ]
Tomaszewska, Justyna [2 ]
Michalak, Jacek [1 ]
机构
[1] Atlas Sp Zoo, Ctr Res & Dev, 2 Kilinskiego St, PL-91421 Lodz, Poland
[2] Inst Tech Budowlanej, 1 Filtrowa St, PL-00611 Warsaw, Poland
关键词
construction products assessment; environmental impact; environmental product declaration (EPD); life cycle assessment (LCA); gypsum plasters; natural gypsum; flue gas desulfurization (FGD) gypsum; global warming potential (GWP); sustainable building materials; SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT; CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS; COMPONENTS; BUILDINGS; EMISSIONS; FOOTPRINT; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.3390/su13084298
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The ongoing global climate change and the associated environmental degradation pose a threat to Europe and the rest of the world. Raw materials and energy are required to produce building materials, which are used for construction purposes. Resulting buildings and structures generate waste during construction, operation, and demolition, and they emit potentially harmful substances. Thus, the key to achieving climate goals is to support low-emission materials and technologies in the construction sector, significantly impacting the environment. In the European Union, building materials are not yet subject to mandatory sustainability assessment during the assessment and verification of constancy of performance (AVCP). Objective evaluation of construction materials' environmental impact requires it to be carried out based on production data on an industrial scale. This article presents the environmental impact of premixed gypsum-based plasters, commonly used in modern construction. Nine environmental indicators (global warming potential (GWP), depletion potential of the stratospheric ozone layer (ODP), acidification potential (AP), eutrophication potential (EP), formation potential of tropospheric ozone (POCP), abiotic depletion potential (ADP)-elements, ADP-fossil fuels, renewable primary energy resources (PERT), and nonrenewable primary energy resources (PERNT)) of premixed gypsum plasters based on natural and flue gas desulfurization (FGD) gypsum were estimated and discussed. Knowledge of the construction products' environmental impact is fundamental for creating reliable databases. AVCP of construction materials in the future will use the data collected during the voluntary environmental impact evaluation.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] CHARACTERIZATION RAW DESULPHOGYPSUMS AND NATURAL RAW GYPSUMS - A CONTRIBUTION TO THE DISPOSAL OF GYPSUM FROM FLUE-GAS DESULFURIZATION SYSTEMS
    HURBANIC, M
    ROGGENDORF, H
    ZEMENT-KALK-GIPS, 1990, 43 (11): : 550 - 556
  • [42] COMPARISON OF FLUE GAS DESULFURIZATION FOR EASTERN VS. WESTERN U. S. COALS.
    Sondreal, E.A.
    Tufte, P.H.
    1600, (258):
  • [43] Application of Ca-based adsorbents in fixed-bed dry flue gas desulfurization (FGD): a critical review
    Xing, Gaoshan
    Wang, Wen
    Zhao, Shuai
    Qi, Liqiang
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (31) : 76471 - 76490
  • [44] Application of Ca-based adsorbents in fixed-bed dry flue gas desulfurization (FGD): a critical review
    Gaoshan Xing
    Wen Wang
    Shuai Zhao
    Liqiang Qi
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023, 30 : 76471 - 76490
  • [45] Mechanism and experimental study of desulfurizing agent based on Mn/ Ce-Ca for sintering flue gas desulfurization (FGD)
    Xing, Gaoshan
    Zhao, Shuai
    Li, Xinrui
    Qi, Liqiang
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2023, 11 (06):
  • [46] The Environmental Footprint of Natural Gas Transportation: LNG vs. Pipeline
    Shaton, Katerina
    Hervik, Arild
    Hjelle, Harald M.
    ECONOMICS OF ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, 2020, 9 (01) : 223 - 241
  • [47] Remediating oxytetracycline-contaminated aquaculture water using nano calcium peroxide (nCaO2) produced from flue gas desulfurization (FGD) gypsum
    Vijuksungsith, Piyarat
    Satapanajaru, Tunlawit
    Chokejaroenrat, Chanat
    Jarusutthirak, Chalor
    Sakulthaew, Chainarong
    Kambhu, Ann
    Boonprasert, Rattana
    ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY & INNOVATION, 2021, 24
  • [48] Effects of Steel Slag and Flue Gas Desulfurization Gypsum on the Properties of Metakaolin-Based Geopolymer Grouting Materials
    Wei, Jing
    Liu, Jiesheng
    Zhang, Man
    Feng, Bowen
    Chen, Yaohua
    Wang, Lei
    Wang, Zhen
    Fu, Wanwan
    Peng, Hao
    Lu, Haijun
    Tan, Xiaoming
    JOURNAL OF TESTING AND EVALUATION, 2023, 51 (06) : 3900 - 3916
  • [49] Improved water and efflorescence resistance of flue gas desulfurization gypsum-based composites by generating hydrophobic coatings
    Chen, Chang
    Ma, Fentian
    He, Tingshu
    Kang, Zeqian
    Wang, Yubin
    Shi, Chen
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 371
  • [50] The more effective option to combat environmental degradation: Energy efficiency vs. renewable energy vs. natural gas?
    Wang, Qiang
    Sun, Ziyi
    Guo, Jiale
    Li, Rongrong
    ENERGY, 2023, 283