Atrial Fibrillation in Heart Failure With Preserved, Mid-Range, and Reduced Ejection Fraction

被引:275
|
作者
Sartipy, Ulrik [1 ,2 ]
Dahlstrom, Ulf [3 ,4 ]
Fu, Michael [5 ]
Lund, Lars H. [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Karolinska Univ Hosp, Heart & Vasc Theme, Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Karolinska Inst, Dept Mol Med & Surg, Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Linkoping Univ, Dept Cardiol, Linkoping, Sweden
[4] Linkoping Univ, Dept Med & Hlth Sci, Linkoping, Sweden
[5] Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, Ostra Hosp, Dept Med, Gothenburg, Sweden
[6] Karolinska Inst, Dept Med, Stockholm, Sweden
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
atrial fibrillation; heart failure; phenotype; preserved ejection fraction; outcomes; registry; PROGNOSTIC-SIGNIFICANCE; CO-MORBIDITIES; BETA-BLOCKERS; OUTCOMES; METAANALYSIS; ASSOCIATION; CANDESARTAN; DYSFUNCTION; PREVALENCE; TRENDS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jchf.2017.05.001
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES The study sought to assess the independent risk factors for, consequences of, and outcomes with atrial fibrillation (AF) compared with sinus rhythm (SR) in heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) versus HF with mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF) versus HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). BACKGROUND AF is common in HF, but most data are from HFrEF. The importance of AF in HFpEF and HFmrEF is less well known. METHODS In patients from 2000 to 2012 in the SwedeHF (Swedish Heart Failure Registry) registry, enriched with patient-level data from national health care registries, the authors assessed prevalence of, associations with, and prognostic impact of AF in HFpEF versus HFmrEF versus HFrEF. RESULTS Of 41,446 patients, 23% had HFpEF, 22% had HFmrEF, and 55% had HFrEF. The prevalence of AF was 65%, 60%, and 53% in HFpEF, HFmrEF, and HFrEF, respectively. Independent associations with AF were similar in HFpEF, HFmrEF, and HFrEF and included greater age, male, duration of HF, prior myocardial infarction, and prior stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA). The adjusted hazard ratios for AF versus SR in HFpEF, HFmrEF, and HFrEF were the following: for death, 1.11 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02 to 1.21), 1.22 (95% CI: 1.12 to 1.33), and 1.17 (95% CI: 1.11 to 1.23); for HF hospitalization or death, 1.17 (95% CI: 1.09 to 1.26), 1.29 (95% CI: 1.20 to 1.40), and 1.15 (95% CI: 1.10 to 1.20); and for stroke or TIA or death, 1.15 (95% CI: 1.07 to 1.25), 1.23 (95% CI: 1.13 to 1.34), and 1.19 (95% CI: 1.14 to 1.26). CONCLUSIONS AF was progressively more common with increasing ejection fraction, but was associated with similar clinical characteristics in HFpEF, HFmrEF, and HFrEF. AF was associated with similarly increased risk of death, HF hospitalization, and stroke or TIA in all ejection fraction groups. In contrast, AF and SR populations were considerably different regarding associated patient characteristics and outcomes. (C) 2017 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.
引用
收藏
页码:565 / 574
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Heart Failure With Mid-range Ejection Fraction
    Srivastava, Pratyaksh K.
    Hsu, Jeffrey J.
    Ziaeian, Boback
    Fonarow, Gregg C.
    CURRENT HEART FAILURE REPORTS, 2020, 17 (01) : 1 - 8
  • [32] Heart Failure Mid-Range Ejection Fraction
    Martinez, Paula Felippe
    Okoshi, Marina Politi
    Okoshi, Katashi
    de Oliveira-Junior, Silvio Assis
    ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE CARDIOLOGIA, 2021, 116 (01) : 24 - 25
  • [33] Heart Failure With Mid-range Ejection Fraction
    Pratyaksh K. Srivastava
    Jeffrey J. Hsu
    Boback Ziaeian
    Gregg C. Fonarow
    Current Heart Failure Reports, 2020, 17 : 1 - 8
  • [34] Heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction: not a mid-range prognosis
    Borges-Rosa, J.
    Almeida, J. P. L.
    Martinho, S.
    Marques-Alves, P.
    Oliveira-Santos, M.
    Goncalves, L.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2022, 43 : 846 - 846
  • [35] Impact of atrial fibrillation on the risk of death in patients with mid-range and preserved ejection fraction
    Xavier Fontes, A.
    Oliveira, L.
    Serena, C.
    Moura-Ferreira, S.
    Almeida, C.
    Machado, C.
    Dourado, R.
    Santos, E.
    Pelicano, N.
    Pacheco, A. M.
    Tavares, A.
    Melo, F.
    Martins, D.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2018, 39 : 1391 - 1391
  • [36] Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation Could Be a Promising Therapeutic Option in Patients With Heart Failure With Mid-Range or Preserved Ejection Fraction
    Kondo, Hidekazu
    Takahashi, Naohiko
    CIRCULATION JOURNAL, 2023, 87 (07) : 947 - 949
  • [37] Epicardial fat in heart failure patients with mid-range and preserved ejection fraction
    van Woerden, Gijs
    Gorter, Thomas M.
    Westenbrink, B. Daan
    Willems, Tineke P.
    van Veldhuisen, Dirk J.
    Rienstra, Michiel
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2018, 20 (11) : 1559 - 1566
  • [38] Left atrial function and maximal exercise capacity in heart failure with preserved and mid-range ejection fraction
    Maffeis, Caterina
    Morris, Daniel Armando
    Belyavskiy, Evgeny
    Kropf, Martin
    Radhakrishnan, Aravind Kumar
    Zach, Veronika
    Rozados da Conceicao, Cristina
    Trippel, Tobias Daniel
    Pieske-Kraigher, Elisabeth
    Rossi, Andrea
    Pieske, Burkert
    Edelmann, Frank
    ESC HEART FAILURE, 2021, 8 (01): : 116 - 128
  • [39] Do patients with heart failure and preserved, mid-range or reduced ejection fraction have different outcomes?
    Pancheva, Ralitsa
    Yovev, Svetoslav
    Kolev, Vasil
    Stoimenov, Blagovest
    COR ET VASA, 2020, 62 (06) : 567 - 573
  • [40] Clinical characteristics and prognosis of patients with decompensated heart failure and preserved, mid-range and reduced ejection fraction
    Christodorescu, R. M.
    Lala, R.
    Apostolescu, A.
    Trofenciuc, M. N.
    Petrescu, E.
    Pop-Moldovan, A.
    Dragan, S.
    Darabantiu, D.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2018, 20 : 109 - 109