Atrial Fibrillation in Heart Failure With Preserved, Mid-Range, and Reduced Ejection Fraction

被引:275
|
作者
Sartipy, Ulrik [1 ,2 ]
Dahlstrom, Ulf [3 ,4 ]
Fu, Michael [5 ]
Lund, Lars H. [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Karolinska Univ Hosp, Heart & Vasc Theme, Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Karolinska Inst, Dept Mol Med & Surg, Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Linkoping Univ, Dept Cardiol, Linkoping, Sweden
[4] Linkoping Univ, Dept Med & Hlth Sci, Linkoping, Sweden
[5] Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, Ostra Hosp, Dept Med, Gothenburg, Sweden
[6] Karolinska Inst, Dept Med, Stockholm, Sweden
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
atrial fibrillation; heart failure; phenotype; preserved ejection fraction; outcomes; registry; PROGNOSTIC-SIGNIFICANCE; CO-MORBIDITIES; BETA-BLOCKERS; OUTCOMES; METAANALYSIS; ASSOCIATION; CANDESARTAN; DYSFUNCTION; PREVALENCE; TRENDS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jchf.2017.05.001
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES The study sought to assess the independent risk factors for, consequences of, and outcomes with atrial fibrillation (AF) compared with sinus rhythm (SR) in heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) versus HF with mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF) versus HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). BACKGROUND AF is common in HF, but most data are from HFrEF. The importance of AF in HFpEF and HFmrEF is less well known. METHODS In patients from 2000 to 2012 in the SwedeHF (Swedish Heart Failure Registry) registry, enriched with patient-level data from national health care registries, the authors assessed prevalence of, associations with, and prognostic impact of AF in HFpEF versus HFmrEF versus HFrEF. RESULTS Of 41,446 patients, 23% had HFpEF, 22% had HFmrEF, and 55% had HFrEF. The prevalence of AF was 65%, 60%, and 53% in HFpEF, HFmrEF, and HFrEF, respectively. Independent associations with AF were similar in HFpEF, HFmrEF, and HFrEF and included greater age, male, duration of HF, prior myocardial infarction, and prior stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA). The adjusted hazard ratios for AF versus SR in HFpEF, HFmrEF, and HFrEF were the following: for death, 1.11 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02 to 1.21), 1.22 (95% CI: 1.12 to 1.33), and 1.17 (95% CI: 1.11 to 1.23); for HF hospitalization or death, 1.17 (95% CI: 1.09 to 1.26), 1.29 (95% CI: 1.20 to 1.40), and 1.15 (95% CI: 1.10 to 1.20); and for stroke or TIA or death, 1.15 (95% CI: 1.07 to 1.25), 1.23 (95% CI: 1.13 to 1.34), and 1.19 (95% CI: 1.14 to 1.26). CONCLUSIONS AF was progressively more common with increasing ejection fraction, but was associated with similar clinical characteristics in HFpEF, HFmrEF, and HFrEF. AF was associated with similarly increased risk of death, HF hospitalization, and stroke or TIA in all ejection fraction groups. In contrast, AF and SR populations were considerably different regarding associated patient characteristics and outcomes. (C) 2017 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.
引用
收藏
页码:565 / 574
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Impact of atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure and reduced, mid-range or preserved ejection fraction
    Son, Mi Kyoung
    Park, Jin Joo
    Lim, Nam-Kyoo
    Kim, Won-Ho
    Choi, Dong-Ju
    HEART, 2020, 106 (15) : 1160 - 1168
  • [2] Heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction and with preserved ejection fraction
    Petutschnigg, J.
    Edelmann, F.
    HERZ, 2018, 43 (05) : 392 - 405
  • [3] The difference in association of atrial fibrillation and sinus rhythm with heart failure with reduced, mid-range and preserved ejection fraction.
    Rakisheva, Amina
    Mussagaliyeva, A.
    Koshumbayeva, K.
    Isabekova, A.
    Ahyt, B.
    Zeynaliyeva, F.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2019, 21 : 67 - 67
  • [4] The impact of atrial fibrillation on clinical outcomes in heart failure with mid-range and preserved ejection fraction patients
    Musta, Irina
    Elkholey, Khaled
    Fudim, Marat
    Stavrakis, Stavros
    HEART RHYTHM, 2024, 21 (11) : 2110 - 2117
  • [5] Impact of atrial fibrillation on rest and exercise haemodynamics in heart failure with mid-range and preserved ejection fraction
    Kaye, David M.
    Silvestry, Frank E.
    Gustafsson, Finn
    Cleland, John G.
    van Veldhuisen, Dirk J.
    Ponikowski, Piotr
    Komtebedde, Jan
    Nanayakkara, Shane
    Burkhoff, Dan
    Shah, Sanjiv J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2017, 19 (12) : 1690 - 1697
  • [6] Left atrial diameter in heart failure with left ventricular preserved, mid-range, and reduced ejection fraction
    Zhu, Ning
    Chen, Hao
    Zhao, Xuyong
    Ye, Fanhao
    Jiang, Wenbing
    Wang, Yi
    MEDICINE, 2019, 98 (48)
  • [7] Heart Failure With Mid-Range Ejection Fraction: Clinical Characteristics and Survival Comparing With Heart Failure With Reduced and Preserved Ejection Fraction
    Li, Dan L.
    Quispe, Renato
    Madan, Nidhi
    Taub, Cynthia C.
    CIRCULATION, 2017, 136
  • [8] Does heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction resemble heart failure with preserved ejection fraction?
    Ozlek, Bulent
    Ozlek, Eda
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2021, 37 (03): : 889 - 889
  • [9] Does heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction resemble heart failure with preserved ejection fraction?
    Bülent Özlek
    Eda Özlek
    The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, 2021, 37 : 889 - 889
  • [10] Central and Obstructive Apneas in Heart Failure With Reduced, Mid-Range and Preserved Ejection Fraction
    Borrelli, Chiara
    Gentile, Francesco
    Sciarrone, Paolo
    Mirizzi, Gianluca
    Vergaro, Giuseppe
    Ghionzoli, Nicolo
    Bramanti, Francesca
    Iudice, Giovanni
    Passino, Claudio
    Emdin, Michele
    Giannoni, Alberto
    FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2019, 6