Intrathecal Morphine Versus Nerve Blocks in an Enhanced Recovery Pathway for Pancreatic Surgery

被引:9
|
作者
Boisen, Michael L. [1 ]
McQuaid, Alexandra J. [1 ]
Esper, Stephen A. [1 ]
Holder-Murray, Jennifer [2 ]
Zureikat, Amer H. [2 ]
Hogg, Melissa E. [2 ]
Paronish, Julie [1 ]
Subramaniam, Kathirvel [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol & Perioperat Med, 200 Lothrop St,Suite C-200, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
关键词
Pancreatectomy; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Enhanced recovery; Intrathecal; Transversus abdominis plane block; Quadratus lumborum block; QUADRATUS LUMBORUM BLOCK; EPIDURAL ANALGESIA; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PERIOPERATIVE PAIN; PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; INSTITUTION; EFFICACY; PROGRAM; SPREAD; COST;
D O I
10.1016/j.jss.2019.05.049
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Intrathecal morphine (ITM) and peripheral nerve blocks are accepted techniques for analgesia after abdominal surgery, but their efficacy has not been evaluated in the context of an enhanced recovery pathway (ERP) in pancreatic surgery. Materials and methods: We retrospectively compared postoperative analgesia (pain scores and opioid requirements) after open or robotic pancreatoduodenectomy or distal pancreatectomy among ERP patients receiving either ITM or transversus abdominis plane/quadratus lumborum (TAP/QL) nerve blocks. Results: We identified 303 ERP patients who underwent pancreatectomy with either ITM (n = 251) or TAP/QL blocks (n = 52). Patient demographics and procedural variables were similar between groups. Few preoperative patient characteristics (preoperative stroke and pain medication intake) differed between the two groups. In an unmatched patient cohort, the median pain score on postoperative day (POD 0) zero was 4.5 (interquartile range [IQR] 2.3-5.8) in ITM patients compared with 5.7 (IQR, 3.4-6.9) in patients who received TAP/QL (P < 0.05). Median opioid consumption in intravenous morphine equivalents on POD 0 was 2.7 mg (IQR, 0-11.7) in ITM patients compared with 8.4 mg (IQR, 2.5-20.8) in TAP/QL patients (P < 0.001). After propensity matching for patient characteristics, pain scores and opioid consumption were significantly (P < 0.05) lower on POD 0 and POD 5 in patients who received ITM. The difference in quality of analgesia between ITM and TAP/QL was also maintained in the pancreaticoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy subgroups. Extubation in the operating room was achieved in a higher percentage of patients receiving ITM (92%) compared with those receiving TAP/QL (63%). The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting was similar in both groups. Conclusions: ITM was associated with reduced pain scores and opioid requirements compared with peripheral nerve blocks in an ERP for pancreatic surgery. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:15 / 22
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Saphenous nerve block versus femoral nerve block in enhanced recovery after knee replacement surgery under spinal anaesthesia
    Aya Mahmoud El-Ghandour
    Ahmed Saeed Mohamed
    Eman Mohamed Kamal Abosief
    Mohammed Mohammed Abd El-Fattah Ghoneim
    Aya Hisham Moussa Ahmad
    Ain-Shams Journal of Anesthesiology, 14
  • [32] Institutional Benchmarks of Joint Replacement Analgesia and Mobilization After Intrathecal Morphine vs Multimodal Peripheral Nerve/Plexus Blocks
    Williams, Brian A.
    Dalessandro, James H.
    Kennedy, Patrick J.
    Ezaru, Catalin S.
    Ritter, Marsha E.
    Maerz, David A.
    Ibinson, James W.
    Piva, Sara R.
    PAIN MEDICINE, 2021, 22 (12) : 3116 - 3119
  • [33] Case-matched series of enhanced versus standard recovery pathway in minimally invasive colorectal surgery
    Lovely, J. K.
    Maxson, P. M.
    Jacob, A. K.
    Cima, R. R.
    Horlocker, T. T.
    Hebl, J. R.
    Harmsen, W. S.
    Huebner, M.
    Larson, D. W.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2012, 99 (01) : 120 - 126
  • [34] Intrathecal Morphine for Laparoscopic Segmental Colonic Resection as Part of an Enhanced Recovery Protocol: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Koning, Mark V.
    Teunissen, Aart Jan W.
    van der Harst, Erwin
    Ruijgrok, Elisabeth J.
    Stolker, Robert Jan
    REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2018, 43 (02) : 166 - 173
  • [35] Enhanced recovery after pancreatic surgery: a systematic review of the evidence
    Kagedan, Daniel J.
    Ahmed, Mahrosh
    Devitt, Katharine S.
    Wei, Alice C.
    HPB, 2015, 17 (01) : 11 - 16
  • [36] Nutrition management in enhanced recovery after abdominal pancreatic surgery
    Marquez Mesa, Elena
    Baz Figueroa, Caleb
    Suarez Llanos, Jose Pablo
    Sanz Pereda, Pablo
    Barrera Gomez, Manuel Angel
    CIRUGIA ESPANOLA, 2017, 95 (07): : 361 - 368
  • [37] Outcome of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Protocol in a Patients Undergoing Pancreatic Surgery
    Pandit, Narendra
    Sah, Rupesh
    Awale, Laligen
    Jaiswal, Lokesh Shekher
    Adhikary, Shailesh
    JOURNAL OF THE PANCREAS, 2019, 20 (01): : 4 - 7
  • [38] The Effect of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocols on Pancreatic Surgery at a Community Hospital
    Appleby, P. W.
    Fillion, M.
    Parikh, R.
    Faulkner, J.
    Hope, W. W.
    Duggan, K.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 28 (SUPPL 1) : S123 - S123
  • [39] Enhanced recovery programmes in hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: a systematic review
    Hall, T. C.
    Dennison, A. R.
    Bilku, D. K.
    Metcalfe, M. S.
    Garcea, G.
    ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 2012, 94 (05) : 318 - 326
  • [40] Benefits of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Pathway With Quadratus Lumborum Blocks for Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Lee, Paul S.
    Brunette, Laurie L.
    Sriprasert, Intira
    Eloustaz, Mohamed
    Deshpande, Rasika
    Adams, Crystal
    Muderspach, Laila
    Roman, Lynda
    Dickerson, Shane
    Kim, Michael P.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (11)