The impact of the fall 1997 debate about global warming on American public opinion

被引:139
|
作者
Krosnick, JA
Holbrook, AL
Visser, PS
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Dept Psychol, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] Princeton Univ, Dept Psychol, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
[3] Princeton Univ, Woodrow Wilson Sch Publ & Int Affairs, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1088/0963-6625/9/3/303
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Although global warming has been the subject of some public discussion since the turn of the 20(th) Century, it was pushed into the national spotlight during the fall of 1997, when President Bill Clinton's administration instigated a campaign to build public support for the Kyoto treaty. To examine the effect of this campaign and the debate it sparked, vie conducted two national surveys, one immediately before and the other immediately after the campaign. We addressed three questions: (1) What were Americans' beliefs and attitudes about global warming before the debate? (2) Did the debate catch the public's attention? and (3) Did the debate change people's beliefs and attitudes about global warming? We found that a majority Of the American general public and of the global warming "issue public" endorsed the views advocated by President Clinton before the media campaign began. The debate did attract people's attention and strengthened the public's beliefs and attitudes. The debate produced almost no changes in public opinion when the nation's population is lumped together. But beneath this apparently calm surface, strong Democrats came to endorse the positions advocated by the Clinton administration, while strong Republicans were less inclined to endorse the administration's views.
引用
收藏
页码:239 / 260
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Can media monitoring be a proxy for public opinion about technoscientific controversies? The case of the Italian public debate on nuclear power
    Neresini, Federico
    Lorenzet, Andrea
    [J]. PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE, 2016, 25 (02) : 171 - 185
  • [32] Impact of knowledge, concern and awareness about global warming and global climatic change on environmental behavior
    Yilmaz, Veysel
    Can, Yasemin
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 22 (07) : 6245 - 6260
  • [33] Impact of knowledge, concern and awareness about global warming and global climatic change on environmental behavior
    Veysel Yilmaz
    Yasemin Can
    [J]. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2020, 22 : 6245 - 6260
  • [34] METEOROLOGISTS' VIEWS ABOUT GLOBAL WARMING A Survey of American Meteorological Society Professional Members
    Stenhouse, Neil
    Maibach, Edward
    Cobb, Sara
    Ban, Ray
    Bleistein, Andrea
    Croft, Paul
    Bierly, Eugene
    Seitter, Keith
    Rasmussen, Gary
    Leiserowitz, Anthony
    [J]. BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2014, 95 (07) : 1029 - +
  • [35] Making sense of public opinion: American discourses about immigration and social programs.
    Jiao, Junfeng
    [J]. LANGUAGE IN SOCIETY, 2014, 43 (03) : 369 - 370
  • [37] PUBLIC HEALTH PERSPECTIVE OF THE IMPACT OF INDUSTRIAL POLLUTION ON GLOBAL WARMING AND THE INCIDENCE OF ZOONOSES
    Buterin, Toni
    Doricic, Robert
    Eterovic, Igor
    Muzur, Amir
    Santic, Marina
    [J]. SUMARSKI LIST, 2021, 145 (1-2): : 63 - 69
  • [38] Weather, climate, politics, or God? Determinants of American public opinions toward global warming
    Shao, Wanyun
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS, 2017, 26 (01) : 71 - 96
  • [39] Changing minds about global warming: vicarious experience predicts self-reported opinion change in the USA
    Matthew T. Ballew
    Jennifer R. Marlon
    Matthew H. Goldberg
    Edward W. Maibach
    Seth A. Rosenthal
    Emily Aiken
    Anthony Leiserowitz
    [J]. Climatic Change, 2022, 173
  • [40] Changing minds about global warming: vicarious experience predicts self-reported opinion change in the USA
    Ballew, Matthew T.
    Marlon, Jennifer R.
    Goldberg, Matthew H.
    Maibach, Edward W.
    Rosenthal, Seth A.
    Aiken, Emily
    Leiserowitz, Anthony
    [J]. CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2022, 173 (3-4)