Racial Comparison of Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Partial Nephrectomy for Renal Masses at a Large Volume Tertiary Center

被引:0
|
作者
Sands, Kenneth G. [1 ]
Bhatt, Rohit [1 ]
Vetter, Joel [1 ]
Paradis, Alethea [1 ]
Chow, Alexander K. [1 ]
Bhayani, Sam [1 ]
Figenshau, Robert S. [1 ]
Venkatesh, Ramakrishna [1 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Dept Surg, Div Urol Surg, Sch Med, 660 S Euclid Ave,Campus Box 8109, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
关键词
race; African American; laparoscopic partial nephrectomy; robotic partial nephrectomy; CELL CARCINOMA; DISPARITIES; POPULATION; OUTCOMES; RACE; CANCER; GENDER;
D O I
10.1089/end.2020.0655
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction and Objective: African American (AA) race has been identified to have a higher incidence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and worse renal cancer survival compared with Caucasian Americans (CA), irrespective of tumor size, pathologic type, and surgical procedure. We aimed to compare the outcomes between CA and AA patients undergoing minimally invasive partial nephrectomy (PN) at our high-volume center. Materials and Methods: We queried our PN data repository from 2007 to 2017. We identified 981 cases of PN (robotic n = 943 and laparoscopic n = 38), of which there were 852 CA and 129 AA patients. We compared age, sex, body mass index (BMI), operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), nephrometry score, tumor size, pre- and postoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), length of stay, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), tumor characteristics, and 30-day complication rate. We then estimated the overall survival and disease-specific survival. Results: Age, BMI, operative time, EBL, nephrometry score, tumor size, CCI, length of stay, and sex were not statistically different. The mean preoperative eGFR was higher in the AA cohort (91.4 mL/min/1.73 m(2) vs 86.1 mL/min/1.73 m(2), p = 0.007); however, at 1 year, there was no mean difference (76.8 mL/min/1.73 m(2) vs 74.5 mL/min/1.73 m(2), p = 0.428). There was a higher percentage of Fuhrman Grade 3/4 in the AA cohort (33.3% vs 22.5%, p = 0.044). The AA cohort had a 2.66 x higher incidence of papillary renal cell carcinoma (RCC) (34.9% vs 13.1%, p < 0.001) and unclassified RCC (3.9% vs 0.4%, p = 0.001). There was no difference in tumor stage (p = 0.260) or incidence of benign histology (15.3% vs 11.6%, p = 0.278). There were no differences in 30-day complications (p = 0.330). The median follow-up was 43.2 months. By using Kaplan-Meier curves, there was no observed difference in overall survival (p = 0.752) or disease-free survival (p = 0.403). Conclusions: Our cohort of AA and CA patients with intermediate follow-up showed no worse outcomes for CKD or survival when undergoing laparoscopic or robotic PN. For low-stage renal cancer, there was no difference in overall survival and disease-free survival at a median follow-up of 43.2 months among AA patients, despite having higher grade tumors and a higher percentage of unclassified RCC. Our cohort of AA patients did have a higher incidence of papillary RCC. The equivalent overall survival and disease-free survival could be due to the earlier discovery of lower stage renal masses incidentally identified on imaging studies performed equally for other reasons in both AA and CA patients.
引用
收藏
页码:1365 / 1371
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] LAPAROSCOPIC PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY FOR T1 RENAL MASSES: RESULTS OF MORE THAN 500 CASES IN A TERTIARY LAPAROSCOPIC CENTER
    Porpiglia, Francesco
    Bertolo, Riccardo
    Amparore, Daniele
    Cattaneo, Giovanni
    Checcucci, Enrico
    Mele, Fabrizio
    Bollito, Enrico
    Gatti, Gaia
    Poggio, Massimiliano
    Morra, Ivano
    Fiori, Cristian
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2016, 36 (05) : 2579 - 2580
  • [32] The use of Haemostatic Agents does not impact the rate of hemorrhagic complications in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy for renal masses
    Abu-Ghanem, Yasmin
    Dotan, Zohar
    Kaver, Issac
    Zilberman, Dorit E.
    Ramon, Jacob
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2016, 6
  • [33] VARIATION IN SURGICAL MARGIN STATUS BY SURGICAL APPROACH AMONG PATIENTS UNDERGOING PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY FOR SMALL RENAL MASSES
    Kiechle, Jonathan E.
    Abouassaly, Robert
    Tabayoyong, William
    Dong, Shan
    Smaldone, Marc C.
    Cherullo, Edward E.
    Gross, Cary P.
    Shah, Nilay D.
    Zhu, Hui
    Kim, Simon P.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 193 (04): : E1059 - E1059
  • [34] Outcomes and predictors of benign histology in patients undergoing robotic partial or radical nephrectomy for renal masses: a multicenter study
    Nandanan, Naveen
    Veccia, Alessandro
    Antonelli, Alessandro
    Derweesh, Ithaar
    Mottrie, Alexandre
    Minervini, Andrea
    Aron, Monish
    Simone, Giuseppe
    Capitanio, Umberto
    Simeone, Claudio
    Eun, Daniel
    Perdona, Sisto
    Porter, James
    Sundaram, Chandru
    Zhang, Chao
    Uzzo, Robert
    Challacombe, Ben
    Hampton, Lance J.
    Kaouk, Jihad
    Porpiglia, Francesco
    Autorino, Riccardo
    CENTRAL EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 73 (01) : 33 - 38
  • [35] The use of Haemostatic Agents does not impact the rate of hemorrhagic complications in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy for renal masses
    Yasmin Abu-Ghanem
    Zohar Dotan
    Issac Kaver
    Dorit E. Zilberman
    Jacob Ramon
    Scientific Reports, 6
  • [36] ROBOTIC PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY FOR RENAL MASSES IN ELDERLY PATIENTS: IS IT FEASIBLE AND SAFE?
    Berardinelli, Francesco
    Primiceri, Giulia
    D'orta, Carlo
    Marchioni, Michele
    Ghahhari, Jamil
    Bada, Maida
    De Francesco, Piergustavo
    Gattone, Stefano Antonio
    Cindolo, Luca
    Schips, Luigi
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2017, 37 (04) : 2101 - 2102
  • [37] Assessment of the relationship between renal volume and renal function after minimally-invasive partial nephrectomy: the role of computed tomography and nuclear renal scan
    Bertolo, Riccardo
    Fiori, Cristian
    Piramide, Federico
    Amparore, Daniele
    Barrera, Monica
    Sardo, Diego
    Veltri, Andrea
    Porpiglia, Francesco
    MINERVA UROLOGICA E NEFROLOGICA, 2018, 70 (05) : 509 - 517
  • [38] ONCOLOGIC OUTCOMES OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY VERSUS OPEN PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY FOR RENAL TUMORS ≥T1B
    Finnegan, K. T.
    Meraney, A. M.
    Taher, Y.
    Kesler, S. S.
    Shichman, S. J.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2010, 24 : A156 - A156
  • [39] Outcomes of open partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma in the minimally invasive approach era
    Shibamori, Kosuke
    Hashimoto, Kohei
    Shindo, Tetsuya
    Tabata, Hidetoshi
    Kyoda, Yuki
    Kobayashi, Ko
    Tanaka, Toshiaki
    Masumori, Naoya
    CURRENT UROLOGY, 2021, 15 (04) : 198 - 203
  • [40] Minimally invasive versus open partial nephrectomy for complex renal tumors: insights and limitation
    Kuo, Chuan-Yi
    Chen, I-Wen
    Hung, Kuo-Chuan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 110 (04) : 2481 - 2482