Interval breast cancer characteristics before, during and after the transition from screen-film to full-field digital screening mammography

被引:11
|
作者
van Bommel, Rob M. G. [1 ]
Weber, Roy [1 ]
Voogd, Adri C. [2 ,3 ]
Nederend, Joost [1 ]
Louwman, Marieke W. J. [3 ]
Venderink, Dick [4 ]
Strobbe, Luc J. A. [5 ]
Rutten, Matthieu J. C. [6 ]
Plaisier, Menno L. [7 ]
Lohle, Paul N. [8 ]
Hooijen, Marianne J. H. [9 ]
Tjan-Heijnen, Vivianne C. G. [10 ]
Duijm, Lucien E. M. [4 ,11 ]
机构
[1] Catharina Hosp, Dept Radiol, Michelangelolaan 2, NL-5623 EJ Eindhoven, Netherlands
[2] Maastricht Univ, Dept Epidemiol, P Debyelaan 1, NL-6229 HA Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] Netherlands Comprehens Canc Org IKNL, Dept Res, POB 190793501 DB, Utrecht, Netherlands
[4] Canisius Wilhelmina Hosp, Dept Radiol, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[5] Canisius Wilhelmina Hosp, Dept Surg, POB 90156500 GS, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[6] Jeroen Bosch Hosp, Dept Radiol, Vlijmenseweg 10, NL-5223 GW Shertogenbosch, Netherlands
[7] Maxima Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, De Run 4600, Veldhoven, Netherlands
[8] St Elizabeth Hosp, Dept Radiol, Hilvarenbeekseweg 60, NL-5022 GC Tilburg, Netherlands
[9] St Anna Hosp, Dept Radiol, Bogardeind 2, NL-5664 EH Geldrop, Netherlands
[10] Maastricht Univ, Med Ctr, GROW, Dept Internal Med,Div Med Oncol, POB 5800, NL-6202 AZ Maastricht, Netherlands
[11] Dutch Reference Ctr Screening, POB 68736503GJ, Nijmegen, Netherlands
来源
BMC CANCER | 2017年 / 17卷
关键词
Breast cancer; Mass screening; Mammography; Referral and consultation; Early detection of cancer; PROGRAM; NETHERLANDS; IMPACT; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1186/s12885-017-3294-5
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: To determine the proportion of "true" interval cancers and tumor characteristics of interval breast cancers prior to, during and after the transition from screen-film mammography screening (SFM) to full-field digital mammography screening (FFDM). Methods: We included all women with interval cancers detected between January 2006 and January 2014. Breast imaging reports, biopsy results and breast surgery reports of all women recalled at screening mammography and of all women with interval breast cancers were collected. Two experienced screening radiologists reviewed the diagnostic mammograms, on which the interval cancers were diagnosed, as well as the prior screening mammograms and determined whether or not the interval cancer had been missed on the most recent screening mammogram. If not missed, the cancer was considered an occult ("true") interval cancer. Results: A total of 442 interval cancers had been diagnosed, of which 144 at SFM with a prior SFM (SFM-SFM), 159 at FFDM with a prior SFM (FFDM-SFM) and 139 at FFDM with a prior FFDM (FFDM-FFDM). The transition from SFM to FFDM screening resulted in the diagnosis of more occult ("true") interval cancers at FFDM-SFM than at SFM-SFM (65.4% (104/159) versus 49.3% (71/144), P < 0.01), but this increase was no longer statistically significant in women who had been screened digitally for the second time (57.6% (80/139) at FFDM-FFDM versus 49.3% (71/144) at SFM-SFM). Tumor characteristics were comparable for the three interval cancer cohorts, except of a lower porportion (75.7 and 78.0% versus 67.2% af FFDM-FFDM, P < 0.05) of invasive ductal cancers at FFDM with prior FFDM. Conclusions: An increase in the proportion of occult interval cancers is observed during the transition from SFM to FFDM screening mammography. However, this increase seems temporary and is no longer detectable after the second round of digital screening. Tumor characteristics and type of surgery are comparable for interval cancers detected prior to, during and after the transition from SFM to FFDM screening mammography, except of a lower proportion of invasive ductal cancers after the transition.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Impact of the transition from screen-film to digital screening mammography on interval cancer characteristics and treatment - A population based study from the Netherlands
    Nederend, Joost
    Duijm, Lucien E. M.
    Louwman, Marieke W. J.
    Coebergh, Jan Willem
    Roumen, Rudi M. H.
    Lohle, Paul N.
    Roukema, Jan A.
    Rutten, Matthieu J. C. M.
    van Steenbergen, Liza N.
    Ernst, Miranda F.
    Jansen, Frits H.
    Plaisier, Menno L.
    Hooijen, Marianne J. H. H.
    Voogd, Adri C.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2014, 50 (01) : 31 - 39
  • [32] Screen-film mammography and soft-copy full-field digital mammography: Comparison in the patients with microcalcifications
    Kim, HS
    Han, BK
    Choo, KS
    Jeon, YH
    Kim, JH
    Choe, YH
    [J]. KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2005, 6 (04) : 214 - 220
  • [33] Screen-film mammography versus full-field digital mammography in a population-based screening program: The Sogn and Fjordane study
    Juel, Inger-Marie
    Skaane, Per
    Hoff, Solveig Roth
    Johannessen, Gunnar
    Hofvind, Solveig
    [J]. ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2010, 51 (09) : 962 - 968
  • [34] Comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography with respect to contrast and spatial resolution in tissue equivalent breast phantoms
    Kuzmiak, CM
    Pisano, ED
    Cole, EB
    Zeng, DL
    Burns, CB
    Roberto, C
    Pavic, D
    Lee, Y
    Seo, BK
    Koomen, M
    Washburn, D
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2005, 32 (10) : 3144 - 3150
  • [35] Full-Field Digital versus Screen-Film Mammography: Comparison within the UK Breast Screening Program and Systematic Review of Published Data
    Vinnicombe, Sarah
    Pinto Pereira, Snehal M.
    McCormack, Valerie A.
    Shiel, Susan
    Perry, Nick
    Silva, Isabel M. dos Santos
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2009, 251 (02) : 347 - 358
  • [36] Comparison of Digital Mammography and Screen-Film Mammography in Breast Cancer Screening: A Review in the Irish Breast Screening Program
    Hambly, Niamh M.
    McNicholas, Michelle M.
    Phelan, Niall
    Hargaden, Gormlaith C.
    O'Doherty, Ann
    Flanagan, Fidelma L.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2009, 193 (04) : 1010 - 1018
  • [37] Screening outcome and surgical treatment during and after the transition from screen-film to digital screening mammography in the south of The Netherlands
    Weber, Roy J. P.
    Nederend, Joost
    Voogd, Adri C.
    Strobbe, Luc J.
    Duijm, Lucien E. M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2015, 137 (01) : 135 - 143
  • [38] Low-contrast lesion detection: Comparison of screen-film and full-field digital mammography
    Hendrick, RE
    Berns, E
    Chorbajian, B
    Choi, K
    Lewin, JM
    Sisney, GA
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1997, 205 : 569 - 569
  • [39] Population-based mammography screening: Comparison of screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography using soft-copy reading
    Skaane, A
    Young, K
    Egge, ES
    Scheel, B
    Sovik, E
    Skjennald, A
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2001, 221 : 283 - 284
  • [40] Comparison of reading time between screen-film mammography and soft-copied, full-field digital mammography
    Ishiyama, Mitsutomi
    Tsunoda-Shimizu, Hiroko
    Kikuchi, Mari
    Saida, Yukihisa
    Hiramatsu, Sonoe
    [J]. BREAST CANCER, 2009, 16 (01) : 58 - 61