Quantifying levels of animal activity using camera trap data

被引:370
|
作者
Rowcliffe, J. Marcus [1 ]
Kays, Roland [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Kranstauber, Bart [5 ,6 ]
Carbone, Chris [1 ]
Jansen, Patrick A. [2 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Zool Soc London, Inst Zool, London NW1 4RY, England
[2] Smithsonian Trop Res Inst, Panama City, Panama
[3] N Carolina State Univ, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
[4] Museum Nat Sci, Raleigh, NC USA
[5] Max Planck Inst Ornithol, Dept Migrat & Immunoecol, Radolfzell am Bodensee, Germany
[6] Univ Konstanz, Dept Biol, Constance, Germany
[7] Wageningen Univ, Dept Environm Sci, NL-6700 AP Wageningen, Netherlands
来源
METHODS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION | 2014年 / 5卷 / 11期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
activity level; activity time; circular kernel; proportion active; remote sensors; Von Mises distribution; weighted kernel; PREDATOR AVOIDANCE; COMMON VOLE; TIME; RANGE; FOOD; DETERMINANTS; PATTERNS; RHYTHMS; BUDGETS; BIRDS;
D O I
10.1111/2041-210X.12278
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
1.Activity level (the proportion of time that animals spend active) is a behavioural and ecological metric that can provide an indicator of energetics, foraging effort and exposure to risk. However, activity level is poorly known for free-living animals because it is difficult to quantify activity in the field in a consistent, cost-effective and non-invasive way. This article presents a new method to estimate activity level with time-of-detection data from camera traps (or more generally any remote sensors), fitting a flexible circular distribution to these data to describe the underlying activity schedule, and calculating overall proportion of time active from this. Using simulations and a case study for a range of small- to medium-sized mammal species, we find that activity level can reliably be estimated using the new method. The method depends on the key assumption that all individuals in the sampled population are active at the peak of the daily activity cycle. We provide theoretical and empirical evidence suggesting that this assumption is likely to be met for many species, but may be less likely met in large predators, or in high-latitude winters. Further research is needed to establish stronger evidence on the validity of this assumption in specific cases; however, the approach has the potential to provide an effective, non-invasive alternative to existing methods for quantifying population activity levels.
引用
收藏
页码:1170 / 1179
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Estimating prey abundance and distribution from camera trap data using binomial mixture models
    Kafley, Hemanta
    Lamichhane, Babu R.
    Maharjan, Rupak
    Thapaliya, Bishnu
    Bhattarai, Nishan
    Khadka, Madhav
    Gompper, Matthew E.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE RESEARCH, 2019, 65 (05)
  • [42] USING CAMERA - TRAP DATA TO MODEL HABITAT USE BY WOMBATS AND CATTLE IN AUSTRALIAN RIPARIAN ECOSYSTEMS
    Borchard, P.
    APPLIED ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2013, 11 (01): : 21 - 33
  • [43] Estimating prey abundance and distribution from camera trap data using binomial mixture models
    Hemanta Kafley
    Babu R. Lamichhane
    Rupak Maharjan
    Bishnu Thapaliya
    Nishan Bhattarai
    Madhav Khadka
    Matthew E. Gompper
    European Journal of Wildlife Research, 2019, 65
  • [44] Machine learning to classify animal species in camera trap images: Applications in ecology
    Tabak, Michael A.
    Norouzzadeh, Mohammad S.
    Wolfson, David W.
    Sweeney, Steven J.
    Vercauteren, Kurt C.
    Snow, Nathan P.
    Halseth, Joseph M.
    Di Salvo, Paul A.
    Lewis, Jesse S.
    White, Michael D.
    Teton, Ben
    Beasley, James C.
    Schlichting, Peter E.
    Boughton, Raoul K.
    Wight, Bethany
    Newkirk, Eric S.
    Ivan, Jacob S.
    Odell, Eric A.
    Brook, Ryan K.
    Lukacs, Paul M.
    Moeller, Anna K.
    Mandeville, Elizabeth G.
    Clune, Jeff
    Miller, Ryan S.
    METHODS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2019, 10 (04): : 585 - 590
  • [45] Towards automatic wild animal monitoring: Identification of animal species in camera-trap images using very deep convolutional neural networks
    Gomez Villa, Alexander
    Salazar, Augusto
    Vargas, Francisco
    ECOLOGICAL INFORMATICS, 2017, 41 : 24 - 32
  • [46] A critique of density estimation from camera-trap data
    Foster, Rebecca J.
    Harmsen, Bart J.
    JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2012, 76 (02): : 224 - 236
  • [47] camtrapR: an R package for efficient camera trap data management
    Niedballa, Juergen
    Sollmann, Rahel
    Courtiol, Alexandre
    Wilting, Andreas
    METHODS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2016, 7 (12): : 1457 - 1462
  • [48] Software to facilitate and streamline camera trap data management: A review
    Young, Stuart
    Rode-Margono, Johanna
    Amin, Rajan
    ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2018, 8 (19): : 9947 - 9957
  • [49] Integrating harvest and camera trap data in species distribution models
    Gilbert, Neil A.
    Pease, Brent S.
    Anhalt-Depies, Christine M.
    Clare, John D. J.
    Stenglein, Jennifer L.
    Townsend, Philip A.
    Van Deelen, Timothy R.
    Zuckerberg, Benjamin
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2021, 258
  • [50] Camera trap placement for evaluating species richness, abundance, and activity
    Tanwar, Kamakshi S.
    Sadhu, Ayan
    Jhala, Yadvendradev, V
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)