One-Sided Discussions: Deliberation in Weblogs during the 2009 National Election

被引:1
|
作者
Hassler, Joerg [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Johannes Gutenberg Univ Mainz, Dept Commun, Mainz, Germany
[2] Univ Jena, Dept Empir Methods Commun Studies, D-07745 Jena, Germany
关键词
ONLINE;
D O I
10.1080/09644008.2015.1116521
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Against the backdrop of the 2008 Obama campaign, participatory online tools were one main component of parties' campaigning strategy in Germany 2009. They used a wide variety of online tools to communicate directly with the voters. While political actors reiterated to accentuate the discursive potential of such tools, sceptics questioned whether such instrumental campaign communication can facilitate sound political discussions. The article analyses whether or not the internet fostered citizen participation during the 2009 national election campaign for the German Bundestag. A content analysis of the posts and comments in the weblogs of the major parties, CDU and SPD, was conducted. Results reveal that participation took place only on a very low level. Furthermore, the few comments published (370 in four weeks) failed to meet basic requirements of deliberation such as objectivity or argumentativity. Moreover, both parties actively prevented a free discourse as single comments may not have been authorised.
引用
收藏
页码:542 / 558
页数:17
相关论文
共 32 条