Reliability, Validity, and Ability to Identity Fall Status of the Berg Balance Scale, Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest), Mini-BESTest, and Brief-BESTest in Older Adults Who Live in Nursing Homes

被引:49
|
作者
Pereira Viveiro, Larissa Alamino [1 ]
Vieira Gomes, Gisele Cristine [1 ]
Ribeiro Bacha, Jessica Maria [1 ]
Carvas Junior, Nelson [1 ]
Kallas, Marina Esteves [2 ]
Reis, Muriel [2 ]
Jacob Filho, Wilson [2 ]
Pompeu, Jose Eduardo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Dept Fisioterapia Fonoaudiol & Terapia Ocupac, Fac Med, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Dept Geriatria, Fac Med, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
关键词
accidental falls; aged; nursing homes; postural balance; validation studies; INTRACLASS CORRELATION-COEFFICIENTS; DWELLING ELDERLY-PEOPLE; TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY; AGED; 50; YEARS; DETECTABLE CHANGE; ASSESSMENT TOOLS; RISK; INDIVIDUALS; PERFORMANCE; UTILITY;
D O I
10.1519/JPT.0000000000000215
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Background and Purpose: In any given year, 28% to 35% of older adults experience falls. In nursing home environments, the annual rate of falls increases to 30% to 50%. Our objective was to verify and compare the reliability, validity, and ability to identify falls of the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest), Mini-BESTest, and Brief-BESTest for older adults who live in nursing homes. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study. Older adults (n = 49; aged 62-90 years; mean = 77.8; standard deviation = 7.2) were recruited from a nonprofit nursing home. All participants were assessed by 2 physiotherapists using the BBS, BESTest, Mini-BESTest, and Brief-BESTest. The interrater and test-retest (7-14 days) reliability were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs [2, 1]). Minimal detectable changes at the 95% confidence level were established. To analyze each test's ability to identify fall status, we used receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, whose statistical significance we verified using the area under the ROC curve (AUC) and respective 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The diagnostic likelihood ratios (positive and negative) and 95% CI were used to verify posttest probability. We used Fagan's nomogram to show the posttest probability of each balance test. Validity was assessed using kappa coefficients and the prevalence-adjusted bias-adjusted kappa (PABAK). Results: Interrater and test-retest reliability for the total scores were good to excellent across all 4 tests (ICC interrater value = 0.992-0.994 and ICC test-retest value = 0.886-0.945). All tests were also able to identify fall status (AUC = 0.712-0.762) and were in good agreement with each other (kappa coefficient for individuals with fall risk = 0.679-0.957 and individuals with no fall risk = 0.135-0.143; PABAK = 83.7%-98%). Conclusion: All balance tests presented similar reliability, reproducibility, and validity. This suggests that any of these tests can be used in clinical practice. However, the Brief-BESTest is the quickest and easiest test to perform.
引用
收藏
页码:E45 / E54
页数:10
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [21] The Frail’BESTest: an adaptation of the “balance evaluation system test” for frail older adults; Concurrent validity, responsiveness, validity for fall prediction and detection of slower walkers
    A. Kubicki
    D. Laroche
    L. Coquisart
    G. Basile
    M. Brika
    F. Mourey
    [J]. European Review of Aging and Physical Activity, 2021, 18
  • [22] Reliability, Validity, and Ability to Identify Fall Status of the Balance Evaluation Systems Test, Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test, and Brief-Balance Evaluation Systems Test in Older People Living in the Community
    Marques, Alda
    Almeida, Sara
    Carvalho, Joana
    Cruz, Joana
    Oliveira, Ana
    Jacome, Cristina
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2016, 97 (12): : 2166 - 2173
  • [23] Interrater and Test-Retest Reliability and Minimal Detectable Change of the Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest) and Subsystems With Community-Dwelling Older Adults
    Wang-Hsu, Elizabeth
    Smith, Susan S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2018, 41 (03) : 173 - 179
  • [24] Pay attention: you can fall! The Mini-BESTest scale and the turning duration of the TUG test provide valid balance measures in neurological patients: a prospective study with falls as the balance criterion
    Caronni, Antonio
    Picardi, Michela
    Scarano, Stefano
    Malloggi, Chiara
    Tropea, Peppino
    Gilardone, Giulia
    Aristidou, Evdoxia
    Pintavalle, Giuseppe
    Redaelli, Valentina
    Antoniotti, Paola
    Corbo, Massimo
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [25] The Frail'BESTest. An Adaptation of the "Balance Evaluation System Test" for Frail Older Adults. Description, Internal Consistency and Inter-Rater Reliability
    Kubicki, A.
    Brika, M.
    Coquisart, L.
    Basile, G.
    Laroche, D.
    Mourey, F.
    [J]. CLINICAL INTERVENTIONS IN AGING, 2020, 15 : 1249 - 1262
  • [26] On "Benka Wallen M, Sorjonen K, Lofgren N, Franzen E. Structural validity of the Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Mini-BESTest) in people with mild to moderate Parkinson disease." Phys Ther. 2016; 96: 1799-1806
    Giordano, Andrea
    Franchignoni, Franco
    Bravini, Elisabetta
    Ferriero, Giorgio
    [J]. PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2016, 96 (11): : 1843 - 1845