Reliability, Validity, and Ability to Identity Fall Status of the Berg Balance Scale, Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest), Mini-BESTest, and Brief-BESTest in Older Adults Who Live in Nursing Homes

被引:49
|
作者
Pereira Viveiro, Larissa Alamino [1 ]
Vieira Gomes, Gisele Cristine [1 ]
Ribeiro Bacha, Jessica Maria [1 ]
Carvas Junior, Nelson [1 ]
Kallas, Marina Esteves [2 ]
Reis, Muriel [2 ]
Jacob Filho, Wilson [2 ]
Pompeu, Jose Eduardo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Dept Fisioterapia Fonoaudiol & Terapia Ocupac, Fac Med, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Dept Geriatria, Fac Med, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
关键词
accidental falls; aged; nursing homes; postural balance; validation studies; INTRACLASS CORRELATION-COEFFICIENTS; DWELLING ELDERLY-PEOPLE; TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY; AGED; 50; YEARS; DETECTABLE CHANGE; ASSESSMENT TOOLS; RISK; INDIVIDUALS; PERFORMANCE; UTILITY;
D O I
10.1519/JPT.0000000000000215
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Background and Purpose: In any given year, 28% to 35% of older adults experience falls. In nursing home environments, the annual rate of falls increases to 30% to 50%. Our objective was to verify and compare the reliability, validity, and ability to identify falls of the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest), Mini-BESTest, and Brief-BESTest for older adults who live in nursing homes. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study. Older adults (n = 49; aged 62-90 years; mean = 77.8; standard deviation = 7.2) were recruited from a nonprofit nursing home. All participants were assessed by 2 physiotherapists using the BBS, BESTest, Mini-BESTest, and Brief-BESTest. The interrater and test-retest (7-14 days) reliability were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs [2, 1]). Minimal detectable changes at the 95% confidence level were established. To analyze each test's ability to identify fall status, we used receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, whose statistical significance we verified using the area under the ROC curve (AUC) and respective 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The diagnostic likelihood ratios (positive and negative) and 95% CI were used to verify posttest probability. We used Fagan's nomogram to show the posttest probability of each balance test. Validity was assessed using kappa coefficients and the prevalence-adjusted bias-adjusted kappa (PABAK). Results: Interrater and test-retest reliability for the total scores were good to excellent across all 4 tests (ICC interrater value = 0.992-0.994 and ICC test-retest value = 0.886-0.945). All tests were also able to identify fall status (AUC = 0.712-0.762) and were in good agreement with each other (kappa coefficient for individuals with fall risk = 0.679-0.957 and individuals with no fall risk = 0.135-0.143; PABAK = 83.7%-98%). Conclusion: All balance tests presented similar reliability, reproducibility, and validity. This suggests that any of these tests can be used in clinical practice. However, the Brief-BESTest is the quickest and easiest test to perform.
引用
收藏
页码:E45 / E54
页数:10
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Validity, Reliability, and Ability to Identify Fall Status of the Berg Balance Scale, BESTest, Mini-BESTest, and Brief-BESTest in Patients With COPD
    Jacome, Cristina
    Cruz, Joana
    Oliveira, Ana
    Marques, Alda
    [J]. PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2016, 96 (11): : 1807 - 1815
  • [2] Validity, reliability and minimal detectable change of the balance evaluation systems test (BESTest), mini-BESTest and brief-BESTest in patients with end-stage renal disease
    Jacome, Cristina
    Flores, Ines
    Martins, Filipa
    Castro, Conceicao
    McPhee, Charlotte C.
    Shepherd, Ellen
    Demain, Sara
    Figueiredo, Daniela
    Marques, Alda
    [J]. DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2018, 40 (26) : 3171 - 3176
  • [3] Comparison of Reliability, Validity, and Responsiveness of the Mini-BESTest and Berg Balance Scale in Patients With Balance Disorders
    Godi, Marco
    Franchignoni, Franco
    Caligari, Marco
    Giordano, Andrea
    Turcato, Anna Maria
    Nardone, Antonio
    [J]. PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2013, 93 (02): : 158 - 167
  • [4] Increasing the Clinical Utility of the BESTest, Mini-BESTest, and Brief-BESTest: Normative Values in Canadian Adults Who Are Healthy and Aged 50 Years or Older
    O'Hoski, Sachi
    Winship, Bonnie
    Herridge, Lauren
    Agha, Tainnoor
    Brooks, Dina
    Beauchamp, Marla K.
    Sibley, Kathryn M.
    [J]. PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2014, 94 (03): : 334 - 342
  • [5] Reproducibility of the Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest) and the Mini-BESTest in school-aged children
    Dewar, R.
    Claus, A. P.
    Tucker, K.
    Ware, R.
    Johnston, L. M.
    [J]. GAIT & POSTURE, 2017, 55 : 68 - 74
  • [6] Reliability of the Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest) and BESTest sections for adults with hemiparesis
    Rodrigues, Leticia C.
    Marques, Aline P.
    Barros, Paula B.
    Michaelsen, Stella M.
    [J]. BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2014, 18 (03) : 276 - 281
  • [7] Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of the Mini-BESTest Balance Scale in Patients with Stroke
    Goktas, Ayse
    Colak, Fulya Damla
    Kar, Irem
    Ekici, Gamze
    [J]. TURKISH JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2020, 26 (04) : 303 - 310
  • [8] The Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Mini-BESTest) Demonstrates Higher Accuracy in Identifying Older Adult Participants With History of Falls Than Do the BESTest, Berg Balance Scale, or Timed Up and Go Test
    Yingyongyudha, Anyamanee
    Saengsirisuwan, Vitoon
    Panichaporn, Wanvisa
    Boonsinsukh, Rumpa
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2016, 39 (02) : 64 - 70
  • [9] USING PSYCHOMETRIC TECHNIQUES TO IMPROVE THE BALANCE EVALUATION SYSTEMS TEST: THE MINI-BESTEST
    Franchignoni, Franco
    Horak, Fay
    Godi, Marco
    Nardone, Antonio
    Giordano, Andrea
    [J]. JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2010, 42 (04) : 323 - 331
  • [10] Structural Validity of the Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Mini-BESTest) in People With Mild to Moderate Parkinson Disease
    Wallen, Martin Benka
    Sorjonen, Kimmo
    Lofgren, Niklas
    Franzen, Erika
    [J]. PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2016, 96 (11): : 1799 - 1806