共 50 条
The Clinical Utility of the Chen Internet Addiction Scale-Gaming Version, for Internet Gaming Disorder in the DSM-5 among Young Adults
被引:16
|作者:
Ko, Chih-Hung
[1
,2
,3
]
Chen, Sue-Huei
[4
]
Wang, Chih-Hung
[5
]
Tsai, Wen-Xiang
[6
]
Yen, Ju-Yu
[2
,7
,8
]
机构:
[1] Kaohsiung Med Univ, Kaohsiung Municipal Siaogang Hosp, Dept Psychiat, Kaohsiung 812, Taiwan
[2] Kaohsiung Med Univ, Subst & Behav Addict Res Ctr, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan
[3] Kaohsiung Med Univ, Kaohsiung Med Univ Hosp, Dept Psychiat, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan
[4] Natl Taiwan Univ, Dept Psychol, Taipei 10617, Taiwan
[5] Natl Changhua Univ Educ, Dept Guidance & Counseling, Changhua 50074, Taiwan
[6] Kaohsiung Med Univ, Dept Psychol, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan
[7] Kaohsiung Med Univ, Kaohsiung Municipal Ta Tung Hosp, Dept Psychiat, Kaohsiung 801, Taiwan
[8] Kaohsiung Med Univ, Dept Psychiat, Coll Med, Fac Med, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan
关键词:
internet gaming disorder;
DSM-5;
CIAS;
sensitivity;
specificity;
ADOLESCENTS;
CRITERIA;
PREVALENCE;
VALIDATION;
D O I:
10.3390/ijerph16214141
中图分类号:
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号:
08 ;
0830 ;
摘要:
Objectives: The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) includes the diagnostic criteria for Internet gaming disorder (IGD). This study evaluated (1) the screening, diagnostic, and prevalence-estimated cutoff points of the Chen Internet Addiction Scale-Gaming Version (CIAS-G) for IGD in the DSM-5; and (2) the differences in the CIAS-G and subscale scores among individuals with IGD, regular gamers (RGs), and other control subjects. Methods: We recruited 69 participants with IGD, 69 RGs, and 69 healthy participants based on diagnostic interviews conducted by a psychiatrist according to DSM-5 IGD criteria. All participants completed the CIAS-G and were assessed using the clinical global impression scale. Results: The optimal screening and diagnostic cutoff points were 68 or more (sensitivity, 97.1%; specificity, 76.8%) and 72 or more (sensitivity, 85.5%; specificity, 87.0%) for IGD based on DSM-5 criteria, respectively. The 76 or more cutoff point had the highest number needed to misdiagnose and was the optimal prevalence estimated cutoff point. Conclusions: The screening cutoff point could be used to identify individuals with IGD for further diagnostic interviewing to confirm the diagnosis in the clinical setting or for two-stage epidemiological evaluation. The diagnostic cutoff point provides a provisional diagnosis of IGD when diagnostic interviewing is unavailable. The prevalence-estimated cutoff point could be used to estimate the prevalence of IGD in large-scale epidemiological investigations when further diagnostic interviewing is impractical. The clinical and epidemiological utility of CIAS-G warrants further study.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文