Retropubic versus Transobturator Midurethral Slings for Stress Incontinence

被引:495
|
作者
Richter, Holly E. [1 ]
Albo, Michael E. [2 ]
Zyczynski, Halina M. [4 ]
Kenton, Kimberly [6 ]
Norton, Peggy A. [5 ]
Sirls, Larry T. [7 ]
Kraus, Stephen R. [8 ]
Chai, Toby C. [9 ]
Lemack, Gary E. [10 ]
Dandreo, Kimberly J. [11 ]
Varner, R. Edward
Menefee, Shawn [3 ]
Ghetti, Chiara [4 ]
Brubaker, Linda [6 ]
Nygaard, Ingrid [5 ]
Khandwala, Salil [12 ]
Rozanski, Thomas A. [8 ]
Johnson, Harry [9 ]
Schaffer, Joseph [10 ]
Stoddard, Anne M. [11 ]
Holley, Robert L.
Nager, Charles W. [2 ]
Moalli, Pamela [4 ]
Mueller, Elizabeth [6 ]
Arisco, Amy M. [8 ]
Corton, Marlene [10 ]
Tennstedt, Sharon [11 ]
Chang, T. Debuene [13 ]
Gormley, E. Ann [14 ]
Litman, Heather J. [11 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Birmingham, AL 35233 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Diego, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
[3] Kaiser Permanente Calif, San Diego, CA USA
[4] Univ Pittsburgh, Magee Womens Hosp, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[5] Univ Utah, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[6] Loyola Univ, Maywood, IL 60153 USA
[7] William Beaumont Hosp, Royal Oak, MI 48072 USA
[8] Univ Texas San Antonio, San Antonio, TX USA
[9] Univ Maryland, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[10] Univ Texas SW Med Ctr Dallas, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
[11] New England Res Inst, Watertown, MA 02172 USA
[12] Oakwood Hosp, Dearborn, MI USA
[13] NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[14] Dartmouth Hitchcock Med Ctr, Lebanon, NH 03766 USA
来源
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE | 2010年 / 362卷 / 22期
关键词
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIALS; FREE VAGINAL TAPE; URINARY-INCONTINENCE; WOMEN; COMPLICATIONS; METAANALYSIS; COLPOSUSPENSION; DEFINITION; TREAT;
D O I
10.1056/NEJMoa0912658
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Midurethral slings are increasingly used for the treatment of stress incontinence, but there are limited data comparing types of slings and associated complications. METHODS We performed a multicenter, randomized equivalence trial comparing outcomes with retropubic and transobturator midurethral slings in women with stress incontinence. The primary outcome was treatment success at 12 months according to both objective criteria (a negative stress test, a negative pad test, and no retreatment) and subjective criteria (self-reported absence of symptoms, no leakage episodes recorded, and no retreatment). The predetermined equivalence margin was +/- 12 percentage points. RESULTS A total of 597 women were randomly assigned to a study group; 565 (94.6%) completed the 12-month assessment. The rates of objectively assessed treatment success were 80.8% in the retropubic-sling group and 77.7% in the transobturator-sling group (3.0 percentage-point difference; 95% confidence interval [CI], -3.6 to 9.6). The rates of subjectively assessed success were 62.2% and 55.8%, respectively (6.4 percentage-point difference; 95% CI, -1.6 to 14.3). The rates of voiding dysfunction requiring surgery were 2.7% in those who received retropubic slings and 0% in those who received transobturator slings (P = 0.004), and the respective rates of neurologic symptoms were 4.0% and 9.4% (P = 0.01). There were no significant differences between groups in postoperative urge incontinence, satisfaction with the results of the procedure, or quality of life. CONCLUSIONS The 12-month rates of objectively assessed success of treatment for stress incontinence with the retropubic and transobturator approaches met the prespecified criteria for equivalence; the rates of subjectively assessed success were similar between groups but did not meet the criteria for equivalence. Differences in the complications associated with the two procedures should be discussed with patients who are considering surgical treatment for incontinence. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00325039.)
引用
收藏
页码:2066 / 2076
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Transobturator versus retropubic suburethral tapes for stress urinary incontinence
    Arthur Mourtzinos
    Mary Grey Maher
    Shlomo Raz
    Nature Clinical Practice Urology, 2006, 3 : 62 - 63
  • [32] Midurethral slings versus the standard pubovaginal slings for women with neurogenic stress urinary incontinence
    El-Azab, Ahmed S.
    El-Nashar, Sherif A.
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2015, 26 (03) : 427 - 432
  • [33] Midurethral slings versus the standard pubovaginal slings for women with neurogenic stress urinary incontinence
    Ahmed S. El-Azab
    Sherif A. El-Nashar
    International Urogynecology Journal, 2015, 26 : 427 - 432
  • [34] Transobturator versus retropubic suburethral tapes for stress urinary incontinence
    Mourtzinos, A
    Maher, MG
    Raz, S
    NATURE CLINICAL PRACTICE UROLOGY, 2006, 3 (02): : 62 - 63
  • [35] Retropubic Versus Transobturator Slings—Are the Outcomes Changing with Time?
    Paholo G. Barboglio
    E. Ann Gormley
    Current Urology Reports, 2013, 14 : 386 - 394
  • [36] Comparison of two outside-in transobturator midurethral slings in the treatment of female urodynamic stress incontinence
    Huang, Wen-Chen
    Yang, Jenn-Ming
    TAIWANESE JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 61 (06): : 1004 - 1008
  • [37] Long-term Efficacy of the Transobturator and Retropubic Midurethral Slings for Stress Urinary Incontinence: Single-center Update from a Randomized Controlled Trial
    Costantini, Elisabetta
    Lazzeri, Massimo
    Zucchi, Alessandro
    Di Biase, Manuel
    Porena, Massimo
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2014, 66 (03) : 599 - 601
  • [38] Retropubic and transobturator midurethral slings: a decision analysis to compare outcomes including efficacy and complications
    Shepherd, Jonathan P.
    Lowder, Jerry L.
    Jones, Keisha A.
    Smith, Kenneth J.
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2010, 21 (07) : 787 - 793
  • [39] Which is the better option for stress urinary incontinence with high risk of recurrence between retropubic and transobturator midurethral slings: a systemic review and meta-analysis
    Kim, Aram
    Han, Ji-Yeon
    Park, Young-Jin
    Choi, Woo Suk
    Park, Hyoung Keun
    Paick, Sung Hyun
    Kim, YongTae
    Kim, Hyeong Gon
    Choi, Hong Yong
    Kim, Hyun Woo
    NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2019, 38 : S173 - S174
  • [40] Risk factors associated with failure 1 year after retropubic or transobturator midurethral slings
    Barber, Matthew D.
    Kleeman, Steven
    Karram, Mickey M.
    Paraiso, Marie Fidela R.
    Ellerkmann, Mark
    Vasavada, Sandip
    Walters, Mark D.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 199 (06) : 666.e1 - 666.e7