Sustainable Manufacturing Evaluation Based on Enterprise Industry 4.0 Technologies

被引:8
|
作者
Eldrandaly, Khalid A. [1 ]
El Saber, Nissreen [1 ]
Mohamed, Mona [2 ]
Abdel-Basset, Mohamed [1 ]
机构
[1] Zagazig Univ, Fac Comp & Informat, Zagazig 44519, Egypt
[2] Higher Technol Inst, 10th Of Ramadan City 44629, Egypt
关键词
Industry; 4; 0; Blockchain; big data analytics; circular economic; sustainability; Multi-Criteria Decision Making; neutrosophic environment; BLOCKCHAIN TECHNOLOGY; SUPPLIER SELECTION; CLEANER PRODUCTION; PRODUCT DESIGN; MULTICRITERIA;
D O I
10.3390/su14127376
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Most studies in recent decades focused on transforming linear economics into circular through recovering and remanufacturing the products. Circular Economies (CE) aim to minimize the usage of resources by utilizing the waste in production as new or raw materials. Interconnectivity between parties in the industrial system provides decision-makers with rich information and anticipation of failure. Industry 4.0 technologies (I4.0) allow for handling such issues, protecting the environment by utilizing resources efficiently, and restructuring the industry to be smarter as well. This paper contributes to achieving cleaner production (CP), CE, and social for manufacturers through the linkage between 6R methodology with new technologies of I4.0 such as Blockchain technology (BCT) and big data analytical technology (BDA). In this paper, the authors proposed a Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) decision framework based on the best-worst method (BWM), Decision-Making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL), Technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS), and Complex Proportional Assessment (COPRAS). The authors contributed to addressing the weaknesses and problems of these subjective MCDM methods through the cooperation of the neutrosophic theory with the usage of MCDM methods in this work. In the first stage, all criteria that influence sustainable manufacturer selection are specified using literature research on this topic. BWM-based neutrosophic theory was combined to get the criteria's weights with the aid of DEMATEL-based neutrosophic to obtain the least and best criteria used in BWM in the second stage. The optimal sustainable manufacturer was selected based on TOPSIS and COPRAS under neutrosophic theory in the third and fourth stages, respectively. Furthermore, a case study performed indicated manufacturer 2 (A(2)) is an optimal sustainable manufacturer in two ranking methods otherwise, manufacturer 4 (A(4)) is the worst sustainable manufacturer. The contribution of this work is to propose a hybrid MCDM with an uncertainty theory of neutrosophic for sustainable manufacturer selection based BDA-BCT with 6R. Sensitivity analyses were carried out to show the decision's flexibility in various scenarios. Finally, the consequences for management viewpoints were considered.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Industry 4.0 Technologies for Sustainable Asset Life Cycle Management
    Jasiulewicz-Kaczmarek, Malgorzata
    Antosz, Katarzyna
    Zhang, Chao
    Ivanov, Vitalii
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (07)
  • [42] Simulation in Additive Manufacturing and Its Implications for Sustainable Manufacturing in the Era of Industry 4.0
    Charles, Amal
    Bayat, Mohamad
    Elkaseer, Ahmed
    Scholz, Steffen
    SUSTAINABLE DESIGN AND MANUFACTURING, SDM 2022, 2023, 338 : 370 - 377
  • [43] Role of Industry 4.0 in agile manufacturing to achieve sustainable development
    Agarwal, Vernika
    Hameed, Abdul Zubar
    Malhotra, Snigdha
    Mathiyazhagan, K.
    Alathur, Sreejith
    Appolloni, Andrea
    BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 32 (06) : 3671 - 3688
  • [44] Sustainable Additive Manufacturing in the context of Industry 4.0: a literature review
    Bigliardi, Barbara
    Bottani, Eleonora
    Gianatti, Emilio
    Monferdini, Laura
    Pini, Benedetta
    Petroni, Alberto
    5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRY 4.0 AND SMART MANUFACTURING, ISM 2023, 2024, 232 : 766 - 774
  • [45] Control and monitoring for sustainable manufacturing in the Industry 4.0: A literature review
    Henao-Hernandez, Ivan
    Solano-Charris, Elyn L.
    Munoz-Villamizar, Andres
    Santos, Javier
    Henriquez-Machado, Rafael
    IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2019, 52 (10): : 195 - 200
  • [46] Industry 4.0 factors affecting SMEs towards sustainable manufacturing
    Sharma, Nagendra Kumar
    Kumar, Vimal
    Verma, Pratima
    Sharma, Mahak
    Al Khalil, Ashwaq
    Daim, Tugrul
    TECHNOLOGY IN SOCIETY, 2024, 79
  • [47] Factors that Inhibit Sustainable Adoption of Industry 4.0 in the South African Manufacturing Industry
    Maisiri, Whisper
    van Dyk, Liezl
    Coeztee, Rojanette
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (03) : 1 - 21
  • [48] Exploring Industry 4.0 technologies to improve manufacturing enterprise safety management: A TOPSIS-based decision support system and real case study
    Forcina, Antonio
    Silvestri, Luca
    De Felice, Fabio
    Falcone, Domenico
    SAFETY SCIENCE, 2024, 169
  • [49] Emerging Challenges in the Sustainable Manufacturing System: From Industry 4.0 to Industry 5.0
    Bhat F.A.
    Parvez S.
    Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series C, 2024, 105 (05) : 1385 - 1399
  • [50] Analysing the role of Industry 4.0 technologies and circular economy practices in improving sustainable performance in Indian manufacturing organisations
    Kamble, Sachin S.
    Gunasekaran, Angappa
    PRODUCTION PLANNING & CONTROL, 2023, 34 (10) : 887 - 901