The openness buzz in the knowledge economy: Towards taxonomy

被引:8
|
作者
Lundgren, Anna [1 ]
Westlund, Hans [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] KTH Royal Inst Technol, Dept Urban Planning & Environm, SE-10044 Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Jonkoping Int Business Sch, Entrepreneurship, Jonkoping, Sweden
[3] Inst Dev & Strateg Anal, Ljubljana, Slovenia
关键词
Knowledge-based economy; openness; institutional theory; policy; governance;
D O I
10.1177/0263774X16671312
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In the networked information and knowledge-based economy and society, the notions of open' and openness' are used in a variety of contexts; open source, open access, open economy, open government, open innovation - just to name a few. This paper aims at discussing openness and developing a taxonomy that may be used to analyse the concept of openness. Are there different qualities of openness? How are these qualities interrelated? What analytical tools may be used to understand openness? In this paper four qualities of openness recurrent in literature and debate are explored: accessibility, transparency, participation and sharing. To further analyse openness new institutional theory as interpreted by Williamson (2000) is used, encompassing four different institutional levels; cultural embeddedness, institutional environment, governance structure and resource allocations. At what institutional levels is openness supported and/or constrained? Accessibility as a quality of openness seems to have a particularly strong relation to the other qualities of openness, whereas the notions of sharing and collaborative economics seem to be the most complex and contested quality of openness in the knowledge-based economy. This research contributes to academia, policy and governance, as handling of challenges with regard to openness vs. closure in different contexts, territorial, institutional and/or organizational, demand not only a better understanding of the concept, but also tools for analysis.
引用
收藏
页码:975 / 989
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] On the measurement of the openness of the Chinese economy
    Combes, JL
    Guillaumont, P
    Poncet, S
    [J]. CHINA AND ITS REGIONS: ECONOMIC GROWTH AND REFORM IN CHINESE PROVINCES, 2002, : 1 - 32
  • [22] Openness and productivity of the Swiss economy
    Föllmi R.
    Fuest A.
    an de Meulen P.
    Micheli M.
    Schmidt T.
    Zwick L.
    [J]. Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics, 154 (1)
  • [23] THE ECONOMIC GROWTH AND OPENNESS OF ECONOMY
    Novak, Marcel
    Brezina, Ivan
    [J]. SGEM 2015: POLITICAL SCIENCES, LAW, FINANCE, ECONOMICS AND TOURISM, VOL II: FINANCE, ECONOMICS & TOURISM, 2015, : 929 - 936
  • [24] Evidence and the openness of knowledge
    Sharon, Assaf
    Spectre, Levi
    [J]. PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES, 2017, 174 (04) : 1001 - 1037
  • [25] Evidence and the openness of knowledge
    Assaf Sharon
    Levi Spectre
    [J]. Philosophical Studies, 2017, 174 : 1001 - 1037
  • [26] Productivity and Openness in Indian Economy
    Saha, Sanjoy
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2012, 2 (02): : 91 - 102
  • [27] TOWARDS A THEOLOGY OF OPENNESS
    SHARADA, V
    [J]. EXPOSITORY TIMES, 1980, 92 (03): : 86 - 87
  • [28] A Typology of Places in the Knowledge Economy: Towards the Fourth Place
    Morisson, Arnault
    [J]. NEW METROPOLITAN PERSPECTIVES: LOCAL KNOWLEDGE AND INNOVATION DYNAMICS TOWARDS TERRITORY ATTRACTIVENESS THROUGH THE IMPLEMENTATION OF HORIZON/E2020/AGENDA2030 - VOL 1, 2019, 100 : 444 - 451
  • [29] Themed issue on innovation: Towards a knowledge based economy
    Papadopoulos, Ioannis
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2012, 15 (02)
  • [30] ROMANIA TOWARDS A KNOWLEDGE-BASED RURAL ECONOMY
    Manole, Victor
    Boboc, Dan
    Ion, Raluca Andreea
    [J]. EKONOMIKA POLJOPRIVREDA-ECONOMICS OF AGRICULTURE, 2006, 53 : 161 - 170