Comparative evaluation of conventional diagnostic methods for detection of bovine cryptosporidiosis

被引:0
|
作者
Venu, R. [1 ]
Latha, B. R. [2 ]
Basith, S. Abdul [2 ]
Sreekumar, C. [2 ]
Raj, G. Dhinakar [2 ]
Raman, M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Madras Vet Coll, Madras 600007, Tamil Nadu, India
[2] Madras Vet Coll, Dept Anim Biotechnol, Madras 600007, Tamil Nadu, India
来源
INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCES | 2013年 / 83卷 / 02期
关键词
Cattle; Cryptosporidium; Diagnostics; Microscopy; DAIRY-CATTLE; PARVUM INFECTION; PREVALENCE; OOCYSTS; CALVES; GIARDIA; MURIS; HERDS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Cryptosporidium is an important enteropathogen that causes diarrhoea in diary calves. Keeping in view of the importance, there is a need for simple and inexpensive diagnostic and screening tests for the detection of Cryptosporidium infection in dairy calves. In the present study, 4 conventional coprological detection methods were compared and evaluated in detection of Cryptosporidium oocysts in dung samples of dairy calves. Direct smear (DS) examination detected 21 positives (3.15%) for Cryptosporidium oocysts, out of 667 samples screened. In faecal concentration techniques, sugar floatation (SF) and formal-ethyl acetate (FEA) methods detected 39 (5.85%) and 41 (6.15%) positives, respectively. A total of 74 positives were detected by modified Ziehl-Neelsen (mZN) staining technique with a prevalence of 11.09%, showing that mZN technique as the most sensitive method of detecting Cryptosporidium oocysts. Statistical analysis revealed that highly significant difference was observed between DS and SF, FEA and mZN techniques. Inclusive and exclusive detection of Cryptosporidium oocysts by various conventional microscopic methods were recorded. In conclusion, among the conventional microscopic methods followed in the present study, mZN staining technique was more sensitive for detection of Cryptosporidium infection. Further, mZN staining technique is more appropriate and recommended to its use for developing countries like India for diagnosis of Cryptosporidium infection in bovine calves.
引用
收藏
页码:124 / 128
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Evaluation and comparison of serological methods for the detection of bovine neosporosis in Argentina
    Campero, Lucia M.
    Minke, Lieselotte
    More, Gaston
    Rambeaud, Magdalena
    Bacigalupe, Diana
    Moore, Dadin P.
    Hecker, Yanina
    Campero, Carlos M.
    Schares, Gereon
    Venturini, Maria C.
    REVISTA ARGENTINA DE MICROBIOLOGIA, 2015, 47 (04): : 295 - 301
  • [42] A COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF CONVENTIONAL STAINING METHODS AND IMMUNOLOGICAL TECHNIQUES FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF MALARIA
    Pachpute, Samir
    Pai, Chitra
    Urhekar, A. D.
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2013, 2 (07): : 712 - 724
  • [43] Serological diagnosis of bovine brucellosis: comparative evaluation of ELISA and traditional methods
    Du Sert, AP
    Gauthier, D
    Lecointre, O
    Crevat, D
    REVUE DE MEDECINE VETERINAIRE, 1998, 149 (02) : 161 - 168
  • [44] Comparative Evaluation of Different Methods for Voice Activity Detection
    Ding, Hongfei
    Yamamoto, Koichi
    Akamine, Masami
    INTERSPEECH 2008: 9TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL SPEECH COMMUNICATION ASSOCIATION 2008, VOLS 1-5, 2008, : 107 - 110
  • [45] COMPARATIVE-EVALUATION OF METHODS FOR THE DETECTION OF HBSAG IN SERA
    SEMENOVA, NP
    PROKUDINA, EN
    BOCHAROVA, NG
    SHALUNOVA, NV
    ZHDANOV, VM
    ZHURNAL MIKROBIOLOGII EPIDEMIOLOGII I IMMUNOBIOLOGII, 1986, (05): : 12 - 14
  • [46] Community structure: A comparative evaluation of community detection methods
    Vinh Loc Dao
    Bothorel, Cecile
    Lenca, Philippe
    NETWORK SCIENCE, 2020, 8 (01) : 1 - 41
  • [47] Shadow detection: A survey and comparative evaluation of recent methods
    Sanin, Andres
    Sanderson, Conrad
    Lovell, Brian C.
    PATTERN RECOGNITION, 2012, 45 (04) : 1684 - 1695
  • [48] A Comparative Evaluation of Three Diagnostic Assays for the Detection of Human Monkeypox
    Qu, Jing
    Zhang, Xiaomin
    Liu, Kun
    Li, You
    Wang, Ting
    Fang, Zhonggang
    Chen, Cheng
    Tan, Xiao
    Lin, Ying
    Xu, Qing
    Yang, Yan
    Wang, Wanqing
    Huang, Manyu
    Guo, Shiliang
    Chen, Ziqiu
    Rao, Wei
    Shi, Xiaolu
    Peng, Bo
    VIRUSES-BASEL, 2024, 16 (08):
  • [49] COMPARATIVE EFFICACY OF DIFFERENT DIAGNOSTIC METHODS FOR DETECTION OF GIARDIA (GARDIA) IN ANIMALS
    Kurnosova, Olga
    Odoevskaya, Irina
    Khrustalev, Alexander
    Petkova, Svetlozara
    Dilcheva, Valeria
    COMPTES RENDUS DE L ACADEMIE BULGARE DES SCIENCES, 2017, 70 (03): : 443 - 452
  • [50] Addressing Challenges in Chlamydia trachomatis Detection: A Comparative Review of Diagnostic Methods
    Rodrigues, Rafaela
    Silva, Ana Rita
    Sousa, Carlos
    Vale, Nuno
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2024, 60 (08):