Railway noise annoyance: Exposure-response relationships and testing a theoretical model by structural equation analysis

被引:23
|
作者
Pennig, Sibylle [1 ]
Schady, Arthur [2 ]
机构
[1] German Aerosp Ctr DLR, Inst Aerosp Med, Dept Flight Physiol, D-51170 Cologne, Germany
[2] German Aerosp Ctr DLR, Inst Atmospher Phys, Dept Earth Syst Modelling, Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany
来源
NOISE & HEALTH | 2014年 / 16卷 / 73期
关键词
Annoyance; exposure-response relationship; nonacoustical factors; railway noise; structural equation analysis; ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE; SOCIAL-CONTEXT; FIT INDEXES; SENSITIVITY; HEALTH;
D O I
10.4103/1463-1741.144417
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
In some regions the exposure to railway noise is extremely concentrated, which may lead to high residential annoyance. Nonacoustical factors contribute to these reactions, but there is limited evidence on the interrelations between the nonacoustical factors that influence railway noise annoyance. The aims of the present study were (1) to examine exposure-response relationships between long-term railway noise exposure and annoyance in a region severely affected by railway noise and (2) to determine a priori proposed interrelations between nonacoustical factors by structural equation analysis. Residents (n = 320) living close to railway tracks in the Middle Rhine Valley completed a socio-acoustic survey. Individual noise exposure levels were calculated by an acoustical simulation model for this area. The derived exposure-response relationships indicated considerably higher annoyance at the same noise exposure level than would have been predicted by the European Union standard curve, particularly for the night-time period. In the structural equation analysis, 72% of the variance in noise annoyance was explained by the noise exposure (L-den) and nonacoustical variables. The model provides insights into several causal mechanisms underlying the formation of railway noise annoyance considering indirect and reciprocal effects. The concern about harmful effects of railway noise and railway traffic, the perceived control and coping capacity, and the individual noise sensitivity were the most important factors that influence noise annoyance. All effects of the nonacoustical factors on annoyance were mediated by the perceived control and coping capacity and additionally proposed indirect effects of the theoretical model were supported by the data.
引用
收藏
页码:388 / 399
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Testing of the European Union exposure-response relationships and annoyance equivalents model for annoyance due to transportation noises: The need of revised exposure-response relationships and annoyance equivalents model
    Gille, Laure-Anne
    Marquis-Favre, Catherine
    Morel, Julien
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 94 : 83 - 94
  • [2] Exposure-response relationships for annoyance due to freight and passenger railway vibration exposure in residential environments
    Sharp, Calum
    Woodcock, James
    Sica, Gennaro
    Peris, Eulalia
    Moorhouse, Andrew T.
    Waddington, David C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2014, 135 (01): : 205 - 212
  • [3] A comparison between exposure-response relationships for wind turbine annoyance and annoyance due to other noise sources
    Janssen, Sabine A.
    Vos, Henk
    Eisses, Arno R.
    Pedersen, Eja
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2011, 130 (06): : 3746 - 3753
  • [4] Testing a theory of aircraft noise annoyance: A structural equation analysis
    Kroesen, Maarten
    Molin, Eric J. E.
    van Wee, Bert
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2008, 123 (06): : 4250 - 4260
  • [5] Exposure-response relationships for transportation noise
    Miedema, HME
    Vos, H
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1998, 104 (06): : 3432 - 3445
  • [6] A survey on exposure-response relationships for road, rail, and aircraft noise annoyance: Differences between continuous and intermittent noise
    Brink, Mark
    Schaeffer, Beat
    Vienneau, Danielle
    Foraster, Maria
    Pieren, Reto
    Eze, Ikenna C.
    Cajochen, Christian
    Probst-Hensch, Nicole
    Roeoesli, Martin
    Wunderli, Jean-Marc
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 125 : 277 - 290
  • [7] Annoyance from vehicular air pollution: Exposure-response relationships for Norway
    Amundsen, A. H.
    Klaeboe, R.
    Fyhri, A.
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2008, 42 (33) : 7679 - 7688
  • [9] Traffic noise annoyance in the LIFE-adult study in Germany: Exposure-response relationships and a comparison to the WHO curves
    Starke, Karla Romero
    Schubert, Melanie
    Kaboth, Pauline
    Gerlach, Julia
    Hegewald, Janice
    Reusche, Matthias
    Friedemann, Dieter
    Zuelke, Andrea
    Riedel-Heller, Steffi G.
    Zeeb, Hajo
    Seidler, Andreas
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2023, 228
  • [10] Annoyance from vehicular air pollution: A comparison of European exposure-response relationships
    Klaeboe, R.
    Amundsen, A. H.
    Fyhri, A.
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2008, 42 (33) : 7689 - 7694