Exposure-response relationships for transportation noise

被引:378
|
作者
Miedema, HME [1 ]
Vos, H [1 ]
机构
[1] TNO Prevent & Hlth, NL-2301 CE Leiden, Netherlands
来源
关键词
D O I
10.1121/1.423927
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
This article presents synthesis curves for the relationship between DNL and percentage highly annoyed for three transportation noise sources. The results are based on all 21 datasets examined by Schultz [J. Acoust. Sec. Am. 64, 377-405 (1978)] and Fidell et nl. [J. Acoust. Sec. Am. 89, 221-233 (1991)] for which acceptable DNL and percentage highly annoyed measure could be derived, augmented with 34 datasets.' Separate, nonidentical curves were found for aircraft, road traffic, and railway noise. A difference between sources was found using data for all studies combined and for only those studies in which respondents evaluated two sources. The latter outcome strengthens the conclusion that the differences between sources cannot be explained by differences in study methodology. (C) 1998 Acoustical Society of America. [S0001-4966(98)02012-8].
引用
收藏
页码:3432 / 3445
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Exposure-response relationships for road traffic and aircraft noise in Vietnam
    Thu Lan Nguyen
    Yano, Takashi
    Nishimura, Tsuyoshi
    Sato, Tetsumi
    [J]. NOISE CONTROL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2016, 64 (02) : 243 - 258
  • [2] Psychophysiological Responses to Medium Levels of Occupational Noise: An Exposure-Response Relationships
    Darvishi, Ebrahim
    Golmohammadi, Rostam
    Faradmal, Javad
    Poorolajal, Jalal
    Aliabadi, Mohsen
    [J]. ACOUSTICS AUSTRALIA, 2019, 47 (03) : 217 - 228
  • [3] Community response to noise in Vietnam: Exposure-response relationships based on the community tolerance level
    Gjestland, Truls
    Thu Lan Nguyen
    Yano, Takashi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2015, 137 (05): : 2596 - 2601
  • [4] Testing of the European Union exposure-response relationships and annoyance equivalents model for annoyance due to transportation noises: The need of revised exposure-response relationships and annoyance equivalents model
    Gille, Laure-Anne
    Marquis-Favre, Catherine
    Morel, Julien
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 94 : 83 - 94
  • [5] EXPOSURE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIPS IN OCCUPATIONAL ASTHMA
    CULLINAN, P
    GORDON, S
    LOWSON, D
    NIEUWENHUIJSEN, M
    SANDIFORD, C
    TEE, R
    VENABLES, K
    MCDONALD, J
    NEWMAN, TA
    [J]. AMERICAN REVIEW OF RESPIRATORY DISEASE, 1993, 147 (04): : A113 - A113
  • [6] Exposure-response relationships for airborne allergens
    Heederik, D
    Doekes, G
    [J]. CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ALLERGY, 1999, 29 (03): : 423 - 424
  • [7] Environmental exposure to crocidolite and mesothelioma - Exposure-response relationships
    Hansen, J
    de Klerk, NH
    Musk, AW
    Hobbs, MST
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1998, 157 (01) : 69 - 75
  • [8] Impact of the specificity of the exposure metric on exposure-response relationships
    Friesen, Melissa C.
    Davies, Hugh W.
    Teschke, Kay
    Ostry, Aleck S.
    Hertzman, Clyde
    Demers, Paul A.
    [J]. EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2007, 18 (01) : 88 - 94
  • [9] Exposure-response relationships for wheat allergen exposure and asthma
    Baatjies, R.
    Meijster, T.
    Heederik, D.
    Jeebhay, M. F.
    [J]. ALLERGY, 2014, 69 : 117 - 117
  • [10] Impact of expert versus measurement-based occupational noise exposure estimates on exposure-response relationships
    Melissa C. Friesen
    Hugh W. Davies
    Aleck Ostry
    Kay Teschke
    Paul A. Demers
    [J]. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 2008, 81 : 837 - 844