Sustainable software products-Towards assessment criteria for resource and energy efficiency

被引:50
|
作者
Kern, Eva [1 ,2 ]
Hilty, Lorenz M. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Guldner, Achim [2 ]
Maksimov, Yuliyan V. [3 ,6 ]
Filler, Andreas [2 ,7 ]
Groeger, Jens [8 ]
Naumann, Stefan [2 ]
机构
[1] Leuphana Univ Lueneburg, Univ Allee 1, D-21335 Luneburg, Germany
[2] Trier Univ Appl Sci, Inst Software Syst Business Environm & Adm, Environm Campus Birkenfeld,POB 1380, D-55761 Birkenfeld, Germany
[3] Univ Zurich, Dept Informat, Zurich, Switzerland
[4] Empa Swiss Fed Labs Mat Sci & Technol, Technol & Soc Lab, St Gallen, Switzerland
[5] KTH Royal Inst Technol, CESC Ctr Sustainable Commun, Stockholm, Sweden
[6] Univ Appl Sci Northwestern Switzerland FHNW, Ctr Requirements Engn i4Ds, Windisch, Switzerland
[7] Univ St Gallen, Inst Technol Management, Dufourstr 40a, CH-9000 St Gallen, Switzerland
[8] Oeko Inst, Sustainable Prod & Mat Flows Div, Schicklerstr 5-7, D-10179 Berlin, Germany
关键词
Environmental criteria for software; Green software; Resource efficiency; Sustainability indicators; Model of software impacts; Energy-aware software; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; MODEL; GREEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.future.2018.02.044
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
Many authors have proposed criteria to assess the "environmental friendliness" or "sustainability" of software products. However, a causal model that links observable properties of a software product to conditions of it being green or (more general) sustainable is still missing. Such a causal model is necessary because software products are intangible goods and, as such, only have indirect effects on the physical world. In particular, software products are not subject to any wear and tear, they can be copied without great effort, and generate no waste or emissions when being disposed of. Viewed in isolation, software seems to be a perfectly sustainable type of product. In real life, however, software products with the same or similar functionality can differ substantially in the burden they place on natural resources, especially if the sequence of released versions and resulting hardware obsolescence is taken into account. In this article, we present a model describing the causal chains from software products to their impacts on natural resources, including energy sources, from a life-cycle perspective. We focus on (i) the demands of software for hardware capacities (local, remote, and in the connecting network) and the resulting hardware energy demand, (ii) the expectations of users regarding such demands and how these affect hardware operating life, and (iii) the autonomy of users in managing their software use with regard to resource efficiency. We propose a hierarchical set of criteria and indicators to assess these impacts. We demonstrate the application of this set of criteria, including the definition of standard usage scenarios for chosen categories of software products. We further discuss the practicability of this type of assessment, its acceptability for several stakeholders and potential consequences for the eco-labeling of software products and sustainable software design. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:199 / 210
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A review of underground building towards thermal energy efficiency and sustainable development
    Alkaff, Saqaff A.
    Sim, S. C.
    Efzan, M. N. Ervina
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2016, 60 : 692 - 713
  • [22] Energy Efficiency contribution to sustainable development: A multi-criteria approach in Greece
    Neofytou, Hera
    Sarafidis, Yannis
    Gkonis, Nikolaos
    Mirasgedis, Sebastian
    Askounis, Dimitris
    [J]. ENERGY SOURCES PART B-ECONOMICS PLANNING AND POLICY, 2020, 15 (10-12) : 572 - 604
  • [23] Towards sustainable production with resource efficiency: An empirical study of steelmaking continuous casting scheduling
    Hong, Tzu-Yen
    Chen, Chia-An
    Chien, Chen-Fu
    [J]. RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2024, 209
  • [24] Resource efficiency impact on marble waste recycling towards sustainable green construction materials
    Thakur, Anil Kumar
    Pappu, Asokan
    Thakur, Vijay Kumar
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN GREEN AND SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY, 2018, 13 : 91 - 101
  • [25] Towards Sustainable Wastewater Treatment-A Holistic Study of Energy and Resource Recovery
    Sarpong, Gideon
    Gude, Veera Gnaneswar
    Chitikela, Srinivas Rao
    [J]. WORLD ENVIRONMENTAL AND WATER RESOURCES CONGRESS 2018: WATER, WASTEWATER, AND STORMWATER; URBAN WATERSHED MANAGEMENT; MUNICIPAL WATER INFRASTRUCTURE; AND DESALINATION AND WATER REUSE, 2018, : 322 - 335
  • [26] The Transition towards Renewable Energy: The Challenge of Sustainable Resource Management for a Circular Economy
    Tvaronaviciene, Manuela
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2024, 17 (17)
  • [27] Wind energy resource assessment and wind turbine selection analysis for sustainable energy production
    Spiru, Paraschiv
    Simona, Paraschiv Lizica
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [28] A Framework for Establishing Energy Efficiency and Ecological Footprint Metrics for Sustainable Manufacturing of Products
    Oezel, Tugrul
    Yildiz, Serdar
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, VOL 1, 2009, : 179 - 186
  • [29] Assessing the influence of artificial intelligence on the energy efficiency for sustainable ecological products value
    Song, Malin
    Pan, Heting
    Shen, Zhiyang
    Tamayo-Verleene, Kristine
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2024, 131
  • [30] Nexus Resources Efficiency Assessment and Management towards Transition to Sustainable Bioeconomy in Thailand
    Ngammuangtueng, Pitak
    Jakrawatana, Napat
    Gheewala, Shabbir H.
    [J]. RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2020, 160