Balanced crystalloids versus saline in critically ill adults with low plasma bicarbonate: A secondary analysis of a clinical trial

被引:2
|
作者
Brems, J. Henry [1 ]
Casey, Jonathan D. [2 ]
Wang, Li [3 ]
Self, Wesley H. [4 ]
Rice, Todd W. [2 ]
Semler, Matthew W. [2 ]
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Med, Nashville, TN USA
[2] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Med, Div Allergy Pulm & Crit Care Med, Nashville, TN USA
[3] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Biostat, Nashville, TN USA
[4] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Emergency Med, Nashville, TN USA
关键词
Balanced crystalloid; Saline; Acidosis; Bicarbonate; FLUID;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcrc.2020.12.016
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Purpose: We aimed to determine if balanced crystalloids compared with saline improve outcomes in critically ill adults admitted with low plasma bicarbonate. Materials and methods: We performed a secondary analysis of the Isotonic Solutions and Major Adverse Renal Events Trial (SMART). We included patients who presented to the Emergency Department with a first measured plasma bicarbonate less than 20 mmol/L. Among these patients, we compared the effect of balanced crystalloid versus saline on the primary outcome of major adverse kidney events within 30 days (MAKE30), defined as a composite of death, new renal-replacement therapy, or persistent renal dysfunction (final inpatient creatinine >= 200% baseline). Secondary outcomes included 30 day in-hospital mortality, receipt of new RRT, persistent renal dysfunction, incident AKI, and vasopressor-free days. Results: Among the 2029 patients with an initial plasma bicarbonate concentration < 20 mmol/L, there was no difference in the incidence of MAKE30 between those assigned to balanced crystalloid versus saline (21.8% vs 21.3%; P = 0.93). Secondary outcomes were similar between the balanced crystalloid and saline groups. Conclusions: Among critically ill adults presenting to the Emergency Department, initial plasma bicarbonate con-centration does not appear to be a useful marker to guide the selection of balanced crystalloid versus saline. (c) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:250 / 253
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Clinical Effects of Balanced Crystalloids vs Saline in Adults With Diabetic Ketoacidosis A Subgroup Analysis of Cluster Randomized Clinical Trials
    Self, Wesley H.
    Evans, Christopher S.
    Jenkins, Cathy A.
    Brown, Ryan M.
    Casey, Jonathan D.
    Collins, Sean P.
    Coston, Taylor D.
    Felbinger, Matthew
    Flemmons, Lisa N.
    Hellervik, Susan M.
    Lindsell, Christopher J.
    Liu, Dandan
    McCoin, Nicole S.
    Niswender, Kevin D.
    Slovis, Corey M.
    Stollings, Joanna L.
    Wang, Li
    Rice, Todd W.
    Semler, Matthew W.
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2020, 3 (11) : E2024596
  • [42] Effect of Controlling Fluid Choice in the ED and ICU Versus ICU Only on Sepsis Outcomes in a Clinical Trial of Balanced Crystalloids Versus Saline
    Jackson, K. E.
    Wang, L.
    Casey, J. D.
    Self, W. H.
    Rice, T. W.
    Semler, M. W.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2020, 201
  • [43] Conditional Treatment Effect Analysis of Two Infusion Rates for Fluid Challenges in Critically Ill Patients A Secondary Analysis of Balanced Solution versus Saline in Intensive Care Study (BaSICS) Trial
    Zampieri, Fernando G.
    Damiani, Lucas P.
    Bagshaw, Sean M.
    Semler, Matthew W.
    Churpek, Matthew
    Azevedo, Luciano C. P.
    Figueiredo, Rodrigo C.
    Veiga, Viviane C.
    Biondi, Rodrigo
    Freitas, Flavio R.
    Machado, Flavia R.
    Cavalcanti, Alexandre B.
    ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN THORACIC SOCIETY, 2023, 20 (06) : 872 - 879
  • [44] Meta-analysis of colloids versus crystalloids in critically ill, trauma and surgical patients
    Qureshi, S. H.
    Rizvi, S. I.
    Patel, N. N.
    Murphy, G. J.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 103 (01) : 14 - 26
  • [45] Balanced Crystalloids Versus Normal Saline in Kidney Transplant Patients: An Updated Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis
    Pereira, Lucas Carvalho
    Pereira, Igor Carvalho
    Cabral, Thamiris Dias Delfino
    Viana, Patricia
    Ribeiro, Arthur Mendonca
    Amaral, Sara
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2024, 139 (01): : 58 - 67
  • [46] Buffered solutions versus 0.9% saline for resuscitation in critically ill adults and children
    Antequera Martin, Alba M.
    Barea Mendoza, Jesus A.
    Muriel, Alfonso
    Saez, Ignacio
    Chico-Fernandez, Mario
    Estrada-Lorenzo, Jose M.
    Plana, Maria N.
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2019, (07):
  • [47] Buffered solutions versus 0.9% saline for resuscitation in critically ill adults and children
    Antequera Martin, Alba M.
    Barea Mendoza, Jesus A.
    Muriel, Alfonso
    Saez, Ignacio
    Chico-Fernandez, Mario
    Estrada-Lorenzo, Jose M.
    Plana, Maria N.
    EMERGENCIAS, 2020, 32 (06): : 427 - 428
  • [48] Continuous versus routine EEG in critically ill adults: reimbursement analysis of a randomised trial
    Urbano, Valentina
    Novy, Jan
    Schindler, Kaspar
    Ruegg, Stephan
    Alvarez, Vincent
    Zubler, Frederic
    Oddo, Mauro
    Lee, Jong Woo
    Rossetti, Andrea O.
    SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2021, 151
  • [49] Cardiorespiratory response to early rehabilitation in critically ill adults: A secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial
    Eggmann, Sabrina
    Irincheeva, Irina
    Luder, Gere
    Verra, Martin L.
    Moser, Andre
    Bastiaenen, Caroline H. G.
    Jakob, Stephan M.
    PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (02):
  • [50] Coronavirus disease 2019 subphenotypes and differential treatment response to convalescent plasma in critically ill adults: secondary analyses of a randomized clinical trial
    M. Fish
    J. Rynne
    A. Jennings
    C. Lam
    A. A. Lamikanra
    J. Ratcliff
    S. Cellone-Trevelin
    E. Timms
    J. Jiriha
    I. Tosi
    R. Pramanik
    P. Simmonds
    S. Seth
    J. Williams
    A. C. Gordon
    J. Knight
    D. J. Smith
    J. Whalley
    D. Harrison
    K. Rowan
    H. Harvala
    P. Klenerman
    L. Estcourt
    D. K. Menon
    D. Roberts
    M. Shankar-Hari
    Intensive Care Medicine, 2022, 48 : 1525 - 1538