Arterial Ischemic Stroke in Moyamoya Patients Who Underwent Vaginal Delivery and Cesarean Section

被引:2
|
作者
Antoniazzi, Aldana M. [1 ]
Unda, Santiago R. [1 ]
Khatri, Deepak [1 ]
Holland, Ryan [1 ]
Ramos, Rafael De la Garza [1 ]
Haranhalli, Neil [1 ]
Altschul, David J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Montefiore Med Ctr, Leo M Davidoff Dept Neurosurg, 111 E 210th St, Bronx, NY 10467 USA
关键词
AIS; Cesarean; C-section; Delivery; Moyamoya; NIS; Stroke; PREGNANCY; DISEASE; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.wneu.2022.03.135
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Moyamoya disease (MMD) is characterized by stenosis, occlusion, and formation of aberrant collaterals of brain vessels. This derangement in the brain vessels in conditions associated with changes in intracranial pressure can lead to arterial ischemic stroke (AIS). A major challenge for stroke physicians is to recommend the safest method of delivery for pregnant patients with MMD. Using a large national database, our objective in this study was to analyze the risk of AIS in patients with MMD who underwent vaginal delivery (VD) and cesarean section (C-section). METHODS: We used the National Inpatient Sample database for the years 2013-2018 to identify patients with a diagnosis of MMD who underwent VD or C-section. Multiple logistic regression was performed to assess the risk of AIS in VD versus C-section. RESULTS: Of 2166 female patients with MMD, 97 underwent VD or C-section: 49 (50.51%) underwent VD, and 48 (49.48/0) underwent C-section. The analysis of outcomes between VD and C-section showed a higher prevalence of AIS after VD compared with C-section (8.2% vs 6.3%, P = 0.716). The multivariate analysis for MS showed that VD is not an independent risk factor compared with C-section (odds ratio = 2.1, 95% CI = 0.3-13.3, P = 0.417). CONCLUSIONS: Our data did not find evidence that VD and C-section are risk factors for AIS in pregnant patients with MMD.
引用
收藏
页码:E391 / E395
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] 1192 Apgar: Cesarean Section and Vaginal Delivery
    S Taavoni
    Pediatric Research, 2010, 68 : 589 - 589
  • [22] BREECH - VAGINAL DELIVERY OR CESAREAN-SECTION
    CRAWFORD, JS
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1982, 285 (6350): : 1276 - 1276
  • [23] Vaginal delivery after previous cesarean section
    Grospietsch, G
    DEUTSCHE MEDIZINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 1999, 124 (40) : 1184 - 1186
  • [24] Twin births: cesarean section or vaginal delivery?
    Hoffmann, Elise
    Oldenburg, Anna
    Rode, Line
    Tabor, Ann
    Rasmussen, Steen
    Skibsted, Lillian
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2012, 91 (04) : 463 - 469
  • [25] BREECH - VAGINAL DELIVERY OR CESAREAN-SECTION
    FRANKS, P
    PAILY, V
    JOHNSTONE, MJ
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1982, 285 (6352): : 1426 - 1426
  • [26] Elective Cesarean section versus vaginal delivery
    Farias Jofre, Marcelo
    Oyarzun Ebensperger, Enrique
    MEDWAVE, 2012, 12 (03):
  • [27] VAGINAL DELIVERY AFTER CESAREAN-SECTION
    MOREWOOD, GA
    OSULLIVA.MJ
    MCCONNEY, J
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1973, 42 (04): : 589 - 595
  • [28] VAGINAL DELIVERY FOLLOWING CESAREAN-SECTION
    NGU, A
    QUINN, MA
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 1985, 25 (01): : 41 - 43
  • [29] The character of vaginal delivery following cesarean section
    Kuder, K
    Doiter, CT
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1944, 48 : 371 - 373
  • [30] BREECH - VAGINAL DELIVERY OR CESAREAN-SECTION
    LIEBERMAN, BA
    CHISWICK, ML
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1982, 285 (6355): : 1657 - 1657