Analytical light curves in the realistic model for gamma-ray burst afterglows

被引:31
|
作者
Wu, XF
Dai, ZG
Huang, YF
Lu, T
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ, Dept Astron, Nanjing 210093, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Purple Mt Observ, Nanjing 210008, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
来源
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL | 2005年 / 619卷 / 02期
关键词
gamma rays : bursts; hydrodynamics; ISM : jets and outflows; radiation mechanisms : nonthermal; relativity; stars : mass loss;
D O I
10.1086/426666
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
Afterglow light curves are constructed analytically for realistic gamma-ray burst remnants decelerating in either a homogeneous interstellar medium or a stellar wind environment, taking into account the radiative loss of the blast wave, which affects the temporal behaviors significantly. Inverse Compton scattering, which plays an important role when the energy equipartition factor epsilon(e) of electrons is much larger than that of the magnetic field (epsilon(B)), is considered. The inverse Compton effect prolongs the fast cooling phase markedly, during which the relativistic shock is semiradiative and the radiation efficiency is approximately constant, epsilon = epsilon(e). It is further shown that the shock is still semiradiative for quite a long time after it transits into the slow cooling phase because of a slow decreasing rate of the radiation efficiency of electrons. The temporal decaying index of the X-ray afterglow light curve in this semiradiative phase is (3p + 2 + 2epsilon)/(4 - epsilon) in the interstellar medium case and [3p - 2 - (p - 2)epsilon]/2(2 - epsilon) in the stellar wind case, where p is the distribution index of the shock-accelerated electrons. Taking p = 2.2-2.3 as implied from the common shock acceleration mechanism and assuming epsilon(e) similar to 1/3, the temporal index is more consistent with the observed (alpha(X)) similar to 1.3 than the commonly used adiabatic one. The observability of the inverse Compton component in soft X-ray afterglows is also investigated. To manifest as a bump or even dominant in the X-ray afterglows during the relativistic stage, the density must be larger than similar to1-10 cm(-3) in the interstellar medium case, or the wind parameter A(*) must be larger than similar to1 in the stellar wind case.
引用
收藏
页码:968 / 982
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Broadband modeling of gamma-ray burst afterglows
    Van der Horst, AJ
    Wijers, RAMJ
    Rol, E
    NUOVO CIMENTO DELLA SOCIETA ITALIANA DI FISICA C-COLLOQUIA ON PHYSICS, 2005, 28 (03): : 467 - 470
  • [42] Luminosity functions of gamma-ray burst afterglows
    Jóhannesson, G.
    Björnsson, G.
    Gudmundsson, E.H.
    Astronomy and Astrophysics, 1600, 472 (02):
  • [43] Thermal Electrons in Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglows
    Ressler, Sean M.
    Laskar, Tanmoy
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 845 (02):
  • [44] Polarimetric studies of gamma-ray burst afterglows
    Klose, S
    Stecklum, B
    Fischer, O
    GAMMA-RAY BURSTS, 2000, 526 : 323 - 325
  • [45] Broadband modeling of gamma-ray burst afterglows(*)
    van der Horst, A. J.
    Wijers, R. A. M. J.
    Rol, E.
    NUOVO CIMENTO C-COLLOQUIA AND COMMUNICATIONS IN PHYSICS, 2005, 28 (03): : 467 - 470
  • [46] Light curves of gamma-ray burst optical flashes
    Kobayashi, S
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 545 (02): : 807 - 812
  • [47] The apparent size of gamma-ray burst afterglows as a test of the fireball model
    Oren, Y
    Nakar, E
    Piran, T
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2004, 353 (04) : L35 - L40
  • [48] Cylindrical jet - Wind interaction model of gamma-ray burst afterglows
    Ma, HT
    Huang, YF
    Dai, ZG
    Lu, T
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS, 2003, 3 (03): : 225 - 234
  • [49] Cylindrical Jet - Wind Interaction Model of Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglows
    Hai-Tao Ma
    hyf@nju.edu.cn
    Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 2003, (03) : 225 - 234
  • [50] Gamma-ray burst afterglows with cylindrical jet geometry
    Tam, PH
    Cheng, KS
    Wang, XY
    Huang, YF
    Pun, JCS
    NUOVO CIMENTO DELLA SOCIETA ITALIANA DI FISICA C-COLLOQUIA ON PHYSICS, 2005, 28 (03): : 447 - 450