Intranasal immunization of mice with CpG DNA induces strong systemic and mucosal responses that are influenced by other mucosal adjuvants and antigen distribution

被引:55
|
作者
McCluskie, MJ
Weeratna, RD
Davis, HL
机构
[1] Ottawa Hosp, Loeb Hlth Res Inst, Ottawa, ON K1Y 4E9, Canada
[2] Univ Ottawa, Fac Med, Dept Biochem Microbiol & Immunol, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Ottawa, Sch Rebahil Sci, Fac Hlth Sci, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[4] Coley Pharmaceut Grp Inc, Wellesley, MA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1007/BF03401824
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Background: Synthetic oligodeoxynucleotides (ODN) containing immunostimulatory cytosine-guanine phosphate-linked dinucleotide (CpG) motifs are potent systemic and mucosal adjuvants in mice that have synergistic action with numerous other adjuvants, including alum and cholera toxin (CT). Herein, we evaluate CpG ODN with intranasal (IN) delivery of purified hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), relative to and in combination with CZ Escherichia coli heat labile enterotoxin (LT), the B subunit of CT (CTB), and a nontoxic derivative of LT (LTK63). Materials and Methods: BALB/c mice were immunized by IN administration of HBsAg, alone or combined with CT, LT, CTB, or LTK63, and/or CpG ODN, or non-CpG control ODN. In addition, the effect of low-or high-volume administration was assessed, in order to target upper respiratory or entire respiratory tract, respectively. HBsAg-specific systemic (immunoglobulins: IgG, IgG1, IgG2a in plasma) and mucosal (IgA in fecal, lung, vaginal, saliva, and gut samples) humoral responses, as well as cell-mediated immune responses including T-cell proliferation and cytokines (interleukins: IL-4, IL-5; interferon: IFN-gamma) were evaluated. Results: CpG ODN, CT, and LT augmented anti-HBs titers equally, and more so than did CTB or LTK63. CpG ODN acted synergistically with CT and LT,but not CTB or LTK63 to enhance anti-HBs titers. Nevertheless, CpG ODN induced a more Th1-like response for all combinations, compared with the same formulation without CpG. Strength of induced systemic and mucosal immune responses was better with IN delivery of a large volume. A small volume required multiple administrations and higher doses of antigen and adjuvant for equal results. This suggests that delivery of antigen to the lung and/or diges-tive system is superior to delivery to the nasal cavity. Conclusions: Our results suggest that the synergy between CpG ODN and native toxins (CT, LT) may depend on their enzymatic activity and that the lack of synergy with nontoxic derivatives (LTB, LTK63) arises, since they do not have enzymatic activity. Because both CT and LT are too toxic for use in humans, it is possible that CpG ODN may be combined with bacterial toxin mutants that retain some enzymatic activity to optimize immune augmentation.
引用
收藏
页码:867 / 877
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Intranasal delivery of Enterovirus 71 vaccine with Zymosan and Chitosan as adjuvants to enhance mucosal and systemic immune responses
    Chin, C-L
    Lin, Y-L
    Cheng, P-Y
    Lin, S-Y
    Yuan, H-P
    Chiang, B-L
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY, 2016, 46 : 1220 - 1220
  • [32] Mucosal and systemic immune responses by intranasal immunization using archaeal lipid-adjuvanted vaccines
    Patel, Girishchandra B.
    Zhou, Hongyan
    Ponce, Amalia
    Chen, Wangxue
    VACCINE, 2007, 25 (51) : 8622 - 8636
  • [33] Nasal immunization with a dual antigen anthrax vaccine induced strong mucosal and systemic immune responses against toxins and bacilli
    Sloat, Brian R.
    Cui, Zhengrong
    VACCINE, 2006, 24 (40-41) : 6405 - 6413
  • [34] CpG DNA induces stronger immune responses with less toxicity than other adjuvants
    Weeratna, RD
    McCluskie, MJ
    Xu, Y
    Davis, HL
    VACCINE, 2000, 18 (17) : 1755 - 1762
  • [35] Comparison of systemic and mucosal responses after DNA and protein co-immunization
    Pavlakis, George N.
    Jalah, Rashmi
    Valentin, Antonio
    Rosati, Margherita
    Patel, Vainav
    Kulkarni, Viraj
    Alicea, Candido
    Kelly, Rachel Beach
    Guan, Yongjun
    Lifson, Jeffrey D.
    Hirsch, Vanessa M.
    Venzon, David
    Broderick, Kate E.
    Sardesai, Niranjan Y.
    LaBranche, Celia
    Montefiori, David C.
    Shen, Shaunna
    Tomaras, Georgia
    Felber, Barbara K.
    JAIDS-JOURNAL OF ACQUIRED IMMUNE DEFICIENCY SYNDROMES, 2013, 62 : 56 - 56
  • [36] Intranasal immunization of mice with herpes simplex virus type 2 recombinant gD2: the effect of adjuvants on mucosal and serum antibody responses
    Ugozzoli, M
    O'Hagan, DT
    Ott, GS
    IMMUNOLOGY, 1998, 93 (04) : 563 - 571
  • [37] Intranasal immunisation with influenza-ISCOM induces strong mucosal as well as systemic antibody and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte responses
    Sjölander, S
    Drane, D
    Davis, R
    Beezum, L
    Pearse, M
    Cox, J
    VACCINE, 2001, 19 (28-29) : 4072 - 4080
  • [38] Intranasal administration with recombinant Bacillus subtilis induces strong mucosal immune responses against pseudorabies
    Wang, Jialu
    Wang, Yongheng
    Zhang, En
    Zhou, Mengyun
    Lin, Jian
    Yang, Qian
    MICROBIAL CELL FACTORIES, 2019, 18 (1)
  • [39] Intranasal administration with recombinant Bacillus subtilis induces strong mucosal immune responses against pseudorabies
    Jialu Wang
    Yongheng Wang
    En Zhang
    Mengyun Zhou
    Jian Lin
    Qian Yang
    Microbial Cell Factories, 18
  • [40] Intranasal immunization is superior to vaginal, gastric, or rectal immunization for the induction of systemic and mucosal anti-HIV antibody responses
    Staats, HF
    Montgomery, SP
    Palker, TJ
    AIDS RESEARCH AND HUMAN RETROVIRUSES, 1997, 13 (11) : 945 - 952