Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block versus thoracic paravertebral block on postoperative analgesia after laparoscopic nephroureterectomy: study protocol of a randomized, double-blinded, non-inferiority design trial

被引:8
|
作者
Xu, Zhen-Zhen [1 ]
Li, Xue [1 ]
Zhang, Zhen [1 ]
Liu, Zheng-Ye [1 ,2 ]
Song, Lin-Lin [1 ]
Li, Xue-Ying [3 ]
Zhang, Hong [1 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ First Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol & Crit Care Med, 8 Xishiku St, Beijing 100034, Peoples R China
[2] Civil Aviat Gen Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Peking Univ First Hosp, Dept Biostat, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
Erector spinae plane block; Thoracic paravertebral block; Regional anesthesia and analgesia; Pain control; Laparoscopic urological surgery;
D O I
10.1186/s13063-021-05173-0
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Introduction: Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a novel inter-fascial plane block, which is applied more and more in postoperative pain control, especially in chest surgery. Regional block is advocated in order to decrease opioid consumption and improve analgesia in urological surgery. Therefore, we aimed to explore whether ESPB would have similar analgesia compared with thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) in laparoscopic nephroureterectomy. Methods and analysis: This prospective, randomized, double-blinded, non-inferiority trial will enroll 166 patients undergoing laparoscopic nephroureterectomy. Participants will be randomly assigned 1:1 into receiving ESPB or TPVB before surgery. Both ultrasound-guided ESPB and TPVB will be performed with an injection of 0.375% ropivacaine 0.4 ml/kg before anesthesia induction. Standardized patients controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) will be applied for each patient. The primary endpoint is the joint of cumulative 24 h opioid (sufentanil) consumption and average pain score via numeric rating scale (NRS) at 24 h after surgery. Secondary endpoints include rescued analgesic demand, cumulative opioid consumption, and pain NRS scores at different preset timepoints within 48 h after surgery. Other predefined outcomes include clinical features of blockage, quality of recovery, subjective sleep quality, time to ambulation and diet, and adverse events, as well as length of stay in hospital and anesthesia cost. Discussion: Previous studies investigating the analgesic efficacy of ESPB only concentrated on a single endpoint for postoperative pain evaluation, while studies focusing on the direct comparison between ESPB and TPVB in urological surgery are still lacking. Our study is the first trial in non-inferiority design of comparing ESPB and TPVB in patient undergoing laparoscopic nephroureterectomy, and the primary outcome is the joint endpoint of opioid consumption and pain NRS score.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Erector spinae plane block versus quadratus lumborum block for postoperative analgesia after laparoscopic nephrectomy: A randomized controlled trial
    Zhang, Zhen
    Kong, Hao
    Li, Yan
    Xu, Zhen-Zhen
    Li, Xue
    Ma, Jia-Hui
    Wang, Dong- Xin
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2024, 96
  • [42] The efficacy of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) versus freehand ESPB in postoperative pain management after lumbar spinal fusion surgery: a randomized, non-inferiority trial
    Mirkheshti, Alireza
    Raji, Parisa
    Komlakh, Khalil
    Salimi, Sohrab
    Shakeri, Alireza
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2024, 33 (03) : 1081 - 1088
  • [43] The efficacy of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) versus freehand ESPB in postoperative pain management after lumbar spinal fusion surgery: a randomized, non-inferiority trial
    Alireza Mirkheshti
    Parisa Raji
    Khalil Komlakh
    Sohrab Salimi
    Alireza Shakeri
    European Spine Journal, 2024, 33 : 1081 - 1088
  • [44] Continuous erector spinae plane block versus thoracic epidural analgesia in video-assisted thoracic surgery: a study protocol for a prospective randomized open label non-inferiority trial
    R. J. C. van den Broek
    J. S. H. A. Koopman
    J. M. C. Postema
    N. J. Verberkmoes
    K. J. Chin
    R. A. Bouwman
    B. J. B. Versyck
    Trials, 22
  • [45] Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block versus oblique subcostal transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative analgesia of adult patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Randomized, controlled trial
    Altiparmak, Basak
    Toker, Melike Korkmaz
    Uysal, Ali Ihsan
    Kuscu, Yagmur
    Demirbilek, Semra Gumus
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2019, 57 : 31 - 36
  • [46] Continuous erector spinae plane block versus thoracic epidural analgesia in video-assisted thoracic surgery: a study protocol for a prospective randomized open label non-inferiority trial
    van den Broek, R. J. C.
    Koopman, J. S. H. A.
    Postema, J. M. C.
    Verberkmoes, N. J.
    Chin, K. J.
    Bouwman, R. A.
    Versyck, B. J. B.
    TRIALS, 2021, 22 (01)
  • [47] Comparison of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block with ultrasound-guided pericapsular nerve group block for paediatric hip surgery: A randomised, double-blinded study
    Mostafa, Tarek A. H.
    Omara, Amany F.
    Khalil, Naglaa K.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2024, 68 (07) : 616 - 622
  • [48] Comparison of ultrasound-guided continuous erector spinae plane block versus continuous paravertebral block for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing proximal femur surgeries
    Mehrotra, Aditya
    Dayal, Madhu
    Bairagi, Sushmita
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [49] Bilateral Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Transversus Abdominis Plane Block on Postoperative Analgesia after Total Abdominal Hysterectomy
    Kamel, Alshaimaa Abdel Fattah
    Amin, Olfat Abdelmoniem Ibrahem
    Ibrahem, Mohamed Abdel Moniem
    PAIN PHYSICIAN, 2020, 23 (04) : 375 - 382
  • [50] Bilateral Ultrasound-guided Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Randomized Control Trial
    Singh, Swati
    Choudhary, Neeraj K.
    Lalin, Dusu
    Verma, Vinod K.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGICAL ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2020, 32 (04) : 330 - 334