Sensitivity of MEG and EEG to Source Orientation

被引:164
|
作者
Ahlfors, Seppo P. [1 ,2 ]
Han, Jooman [1 ]
Belliveau, John W. [1 ,2 ]
Haemaelaeinen, Matti S. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Sch Med, MGH HST Athinoula A Martinos Ctr Biomed Imaging, Boston, MA 02129 USA
[2] Harvard Mit Div Hlth Sci & Technol, Cambridge, MA 02135 USA
关键词
Magnetoencephalography; Electroencephalography; Suppression ratio; Current dipole; Radial source current; SURFACE-BASED ANALYSIS; TO-NOISE-RATIOS; LOCALIZATION ACCURACY; HEAD MODEL; SIMULATION; BRAIN; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; RECONSTRUCTION; ANISOTROPY;
D O I
10.1007/s10548-010-0154-x
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
An important difference between magnetoencephalography (MEG) and electroencephalography (EEG) is that MEG is insensitive to radially oriented sources. We quantified computationally the dependency of MEG and EEG on the source orientation using a forward model with realistic tissue boundaries. Similar to the simpler case of a spherical head model, in which MEG cannot see radial sources at all, for most cortical locations there was a source orientation to which MEG was insensitive. The median value for the ratio of the signal magnitude for the source orientation of the lowest and the highest sensitivity was 0.06 for MEG and 0.63 for EEG. The difference in the sensitivity to the source orientation is expected to contribute to systematic differences in the signal-to-noise ratio between MEG and EEG.
引用
收藏
页码:227 / 232
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Blind Source Separation of Event-Related EEG/MEG
    Metsomaa, Johanna
    Sarvas, Jukka
    Ilmoniemi, Risto Juhani
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2017, 64 (09) : 2054 - 2064
  • [42] Influence of the head model on EEG and MEG source connectivity analyses
    Cho, Jae-Hyun
    Vorwerk, Johannes
    Wolters, Carsten H.
    Knoesche, Thomas R.
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE, 2015, 110 : 60 - 77
  • [43] MEG and EEG: Advances and controversies in source localization and clinical utilization
    Garcia, PA
    Ebersole, JS
    Sutherling, W
    [J]. EPILEPSIA, 2004, 45 : 2 - 2
  • [44] Multivariate source localization approach for MEG/EEG inverse problem
    Mattout, J
    Garnero, L
    Pélégrini-Issac, M
    Benali, H
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE, 2001, 13 (06) : S196 - S196
  • [45] A Bayesian model of EEG/MEG source dynamics and effective connectivity
    El-Deredy, W.
    Olier, I.
    Trujillo-Barreto, N.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2012, 85 (03) : 346 - 346
  • [46] Optimal resolution of EEG/MEG source imaging by spatial filtering
    Wan Xiaohong
    [J]. NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH, 2006, 55 : S265 - S265
  • [47] Hypothesis testing in distributed source models for EEG and MEG data
    Waldorp, LJ
    Huizenga, HM
    Grasman, RPPP
    Böcker, KBE
    Molenaar, PCM
    [J]. HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, 2006, 27 (02) : 114 - 128
  • [48] Source Reconstruction Accuracy of MEG and EEG Bayesian Inversion Approaches
    Belardinelli, Paolo
    Ortiz, Erick
    Barnes, Gareth
    Noppeney, Uta
    Preissl, Hubert
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (12):
  • [49] The influence of forward model conductivities on EEG/MEG source reconstruction
    Haueisen, Jens
    [J]. 2007 JOINT MEETING OF THE 6TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON NONINVASIVE FUNCTIONAL SOURCE IMAGING OF THE BRAIN AND HEART AND THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUNCTIONAL BIOMEDICAL IMAGING, 2007, : 362 - 363
  • [50] COHERENT MEG/EEG SOURCE LOCALIZATION IN TRANSFORMED DATA SPACE
    Zhang, Junpeng
    Dalal, Sarang S.
    Nagarajan, Srikantan S.
    Yao, Dezhong
    [J]. BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING-APPLICATIONS BASIS COMMUNICATIONS, 2010, 22 (05): : 351 - 365