CAUSAL INFERENCE WITH NETWORKED TREATMENT DIFFUSION

被引:8
|
作者
An, Weihua [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Emory Univ, Sociol & Quantitat Theory & Methods, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[2] Emory Univ, East Asian Studies Program, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
来源
关键词
causal inference; treatment diffusion; social network; field experiment; RANDOMIZATION INFERENCE; SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS; INTERFERENCE; UNITS; IDENTIFICATION; ESTIMATORS; TRIALS;
D O I
10.1177/0081175018785216
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
Treatment interference (i.e., one unit's potential outcomes depend on other units' treatment) is prevalent in social settings. Ignoring treatment interference can lead to biased estimates of treatment effects and incorrect statistical inferences. Some recent studies have started to incorporate treatment interference into causal inference. But treatment interference is often assumed to follow a simple structure (e.g., treatment interference exists only within groups) or measured in a simplistic way (e.g., only based on the number of treated friends). In this paper, I highlight the importance of collecting data on actual treatment diffusion in order to more accurately measure treatment interference. Furthermore, I show that with accurate measures of treatment interference, we can identify and estimate a series of causal effects that are previously unavailable, including the direct treatment effect, treatment interference effect, and treatment effect on interference. I illustrate the methods through a case study of a social network-based smoking prevention intervention.
引用
收藏
页码:152 / 181
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Causal inference in hybrid intervention trials involving treatment choice
    Long, Qi
    Little, Roderick J.
    Lin, Xihong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2008, 103 (482) : 474 - 484
  • [22] Estimation and Inference for the Causal Effect of Receiving Treatment on a Multinomial Outcome
    Cheng, Jing
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 2009, 65 (01) : 96 - 103
  • [23] The use of prognostic scores for causal inference with general treatment regimes
    Tri-Long Nguyen
    Debray, Thomas P. A.
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2019, 38 (11) : 2013 - 2029
  • [24] A groupwise approach for inferring heterogeneous treatment effects in causal inference
    Park, Chan
    Kang, Hyunseung
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY, 2024, 187 (02) : 374 - 392
  • [25] An alternative robust estimator of average treatment effect in causal inference
    Liu, Jianxuan
    Ma, Yanyuan
    Wang, Lan
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 2018, 74 (03) : 910 - 923
  • [26] The Challenge of Causal Inference
    Dammann, Olaf
    Leviton, Alan
    [J]. ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY, 2010, 68 (05) : 770 - 770
  • [27] THE RATIONALITY OF CAUSAL INFERENCE
    SHULTZ, TR
    [J]. BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 1991, 14 (03) : 503 - 503
  • [28] Causal Graph Inference
    Poilinca, Simona
    Parajuli, Jhanak
    Abreu, Giuseppe
    [J]. 2015 49TH ASILOMAR CONFERENCE ON SIGNALS, SYSTEMS AND COMPUTERS, 2015, : 1209 - 1213
  • [29] Private Causal Inference
    Kusner, Matt J.
    Sun, Yu
    Sridharan, Karthik
    Weinberger, Kilian Q.
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND STATISTICS, VOL 51, 2016, 51 : 1308 - 1317
  • [30] An Introduction to Causal Inference
    Pearl, Judea
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOSTATISTICS, 2010, 6 (02):