Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the relative productivity of university technology transfer offices: an exploratory study

被引:903
|
作者
Siegel, DS
Waldman, D
Link, A
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Sch Business, Nottingham NG8 1BB, England
[2] Arizona State Univ W, Sch Management, Phoenix, AZ 85069 USA
[3] Univ N Carolina, Dept Econ, Greensboro, NC 27412 USA
关键词
technology transfer offices (TTOs); university/industry technology transfer (UITT) stochastic frontier estimation (SFE);
D O I
10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00196-2
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
We present quantitative and qualitative evidence on the relative productivity of university technology transfer offices (TTOs). Our empirical results suggest that TTO activity is characterized by constant returns to scale and that environmental and institutional factors explain some of the variation in performance. Productivity may also depend on organizational practices. Unfortunately, there are no quantitative measures available on such practices, so we rely on inductive, qualitative methods to identify them. Based on 55 interviews of 98 entrepreneurs, scientists, and administrators at five research universities, we conclude that the most critical organizational factors are faculty reward systems, TTO staffing/compensation practices, and cultural barriers between universities and firms. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 48
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation Methods and Practices Used by University Technology Transfer Offices
    Rocha, Antonio
    Romero, Fernando
    Cunha, Manuela
    Lima, Rui
    Amorim, Marlene
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 16TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON INNOVATION AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP (ECIE 2021), VOL 2, 2021, : 801 - 809
  • [2] Assessing the relative performance of UK university technology transfer offices: parametric and non-parametric evidence
    Chapple, W
    Lockett, A
    Siegel, D
    Wright, M
    [J]. RESEARCH POLICY, 2005, 34 (03) : 369 - 384
  • [3] A mechanism for sharing best practices between university technology transfer offices
    De Beer, Christle
    Secundo, Giustina
    Passiante, Giuseppina
    Schutte, Cornelius S. L.
    [J]. KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT RESEARCH & PRACTICE, 2017, 15 (04) : 523 - 532
  • [4] Organizational structures for external growth of University Technology Transfer Offices: An explorative analysis
    Battaglia, Daniele
    Landoni, Paolo
    Rizzitelli, Francesco
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2017, 123 : 45 - 56
  • [5] Impact of Lockdown on Professional Practices in French University Institutes of Technology: An Exploratory Study
    Messaoui, Anita
    Redondo, Cecile
    Molina, Guylaine
    Pironom, Julie
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2021, 18 (03): : 1 - 16
  • [6] University research and offices of technology transfer
    Graff, G
    Heiman, A
    Zilberman, D
    [J]. CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2002, 45 (01) : 88 - +
  • [7] Impact of technology transfer offices on university spin-off bankruptcy
    Kirihata, Tetsuya
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER, 2024,
  • [8] An Overview on patenting trends and technology commercialization practices in the university Technology Transfer Offices in USA and China
    Fasi, Mohammed Abdul
    [J]. WORLD PATENT INFORMATION, 2022, 68
  • [9] Assessing the productivity of technology transfer offices: an analysis of the relevance of aspiration performance and portfolio complexity
    Lafuente, Esteban
    Berbegal-Mirabent, Jasmina
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER, 2019, 44 (03): : 778 - 801
  • [10] Assessing the productivity of technology transfer offices: an analysis of the relevance of aspiration performance and portfolio complexity
    Esteban Lafuente
    Jasmina Berbegal-Mirabent
    [J]. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 2019, 44 : 778 - 801