Sorption and solubility of resin-based restorative dental materials

被引:120
|
作者
Toledano, M
Osorio, R [1 ]
Osorio, E
Fuentes, V
Prati, C
García-Godoy, F
机构
[1] Univ Granada, Dept Dent Mat, Granada, Spain
[2] Univ Bologna, Dept Operat Dent, Bologna, Italy
[3] Nova SE Univ, Coll Dent Med, Ft Lauderdale, FL 33314 USA
关键词
sorption; solubility; resin composite; polyacid-modified resin composite; glass ionomer;
D O I
10.1016/S0300-5712(02)00083-0
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives. To measure the water sorption and solubility of different resin-based restorative dental materials. Methods. Eight commercial restorative materials were selected: two resin composites (Z100 and Prodigy), four potyacid-modified resin composites (Compoglass, Compoglass F, Dyract and Dyract AP), and two light-cured glass ionomers (Vitremer and Fuji II LC). Five disc specimens were prepared of each material, following the manufacturer's instructions, and were grounded wet with silicon carbide paper. Water sorption and solubility of the different materials were calculated by means of weighting the samples before and after water immersion and desiccation. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Student-Newman-Keuts tests (P < 0.05). Results. Compoglass and Compoglass F showed the lowest values of water sorption and solubility, white Vitremer and Fuji II LC displayed the highest values. Solubility values of Prodigy, Z100, Dyract and Dyract AP did not show significant differences among them, while their water sorption values attained some differences and were tower for Prodigy followed by Dyract and Z100. Conclusions. The attained water sorption and solubility values are mainly influenced by the generic type of material and variations occurring between materials of the same type may result from differences in resin matrix compositions. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All. rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 50
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Cytotoxicity of resin-based restorative materials on human pulp cell cultures
    Huang, FM
    Chang, YC
    ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 2002, 94 (03): : 361 - 365
  • [42] Comparison of two methods for radiometric evaluation of resin-based restorative materials
    Gurdal, P
    Akdeniz, BG
    DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 1998, 27 (04) : 236 - 239
  • [43] Bulk-fill resin-based composite restorative materials: a review
    J. Chesterman
    A. Jowett
    A. Gallacher
    P. Nixon
    British Dental Journal, 2017, 222 : 337 - 344
  • [44] COMMENTARY. Color Stability of Ten Resin-Based Restorative Materials
    Paravina, Rade D.
    JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC AND RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2012, 24 (03) : 200 - 200
  • [45] Post-polymerization reactivity of free radicals trapped in resin-based dental restorative materials by ESR spectroscopy
    Amorim, Bruna Cristina
    Santana Vicentin, Bruno Luiz
    Di Mauro, Eduardo
    POLYMER BULLETIN, 2020, 77 (06) : 3249 - 3262
  • [46] Bulk-fill resin-based composite restorative materials: a review
    Chesterman, J.
    Jowett, A.
    Gallacher, A.
    Nixon, P.
    BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 2017, 222 (05) : 337 - 344
  • [47] Contact angle and surface free energy of experimental resin-based dental restorative materials after chewing simulation
    Ruettermann, Stefan
    Beikler, Thomas
    Janda, Ralf
    DENTAL MATERIALS, 2014, 30 (06) : 702 - 707
  • [48] Post-polymerization reactivity of free radicals trapped in resin-based dental restorative materials by ESR spectroscopy
    Bruna Cristina Amorim
    Bruno Luiz Santana Vicentin
    Eduardo Di Mauro
    Polymer Bulletin, 2020, 77 : 3249 - 3262
  • [49] WATER SORPTION AND SOLUBILITY OF RESIN-BASED MATERIALS FOLLOWING INADEQUATE POLYMERIZATION BY A VISIBLE-LIGHT CURING SYSTEM
    PEARSON, GJ
    LONGMAN, CM
    JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 1989, 16 (01) : 57 - 61
  • [50] Effect of Zinc Oxide-Eugenol Materials on Resin-Based Restorative Materials Hardness
    Balan, Adriana
    Perju, Manuela Cristina
    Savin, Carmen
    Stoleriu, Simona
    Muntean, Alexandrina
    MATERIALE PLASTICE, 2016, 53 (02) : 312 - 315