First-trimester diagnosis and management of pregnancies implanted into the lower uterine segment Cesarean section scar

被引:518
|
作者
Jurkovic, D [1 ]
Hillaby, K [1 ]
Woelfer, B [1 ]
Lawrence, A [1 ]
Salim, R [1 ]
Elson, CJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Kings Coll Hosp London, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Early Pregnancy & Gynaecol Assessment Unit, London SE5 8RX, England
关键词
Cesarean section scar; ectopic pregnancy; first trimester; ultrasound;
D O I
10.1002/uog.56
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Objective To describe first-trimester ultrasound diagnosis and management of pregnancies implanted into uterine Cesarean section scars. Methods All women referred for an ultrasound scan because of suspected early pregnancy complications were screened for pregnancies implanted into a previous Cesarean section scar. The management of Cesarean section scar pregnancies included transvaginal surgical evacuation, medical treatment with local injection of 25 mg methotrexate into the exocelomic cavity and expectant management. Results Eighteen Cesarean section scar pregnancies were diagnosed in a 4-year period. The prevalence in the local population was 1:1800 pregnancies. Surgical treatment was used in eight women and it was successful in all cases. The respective success rates of medical treatment and expectant management were 5/7 (71%) and 1/3 (33%). Five women (28%) required blood transfusion and one woman (6%) had a hysterectomy. Conclusions Cesarean section scar pregnancies are more common than previously thought. When the diagnosis is made in the first trimester the prognosis is good and the risk of hysterectomy is relatively low. Copyright (C) 2003 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:220 / 227
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Clinical significance of uterine scar tenderness in predicting strength of scar in patients with lower segment cesarean section
    Khalil, Safia
    Shaheen, Nighat
    Iftikhar, Palwasha Maria
    RAWAL MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 38 (04): : 401 - 403
  • [22] Outcome of Cesarean Scar Pregnancies Diagnosed Sonographically in the First Trimester
    Michaels, Aya Y.
    Washburn, Erin E.
    Pocius, Katherine D.
    Benson, Carol B.
    Doubilet, Peter M.
    Carusi, Daniela A.
    JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2015, 34 (04) : 595 - 599
  • [23] Diagnosing early scar pregnancy in the lower uterine segment after cesarean section by intracavitary ultrasound
    Xiao-Ling Cheng
    Xiao-Yan Cao
    Xiao-Qian Wang
    Heng-Li Lin
    Jin-Chuan Fang
    Lin Wang
    World Journal of Clinical Cases, 2022, (02) : 547 - 553
  • [24] Diagnosing early scar pregnancy in the lower uterine segment after cesarean section by intracavitary ultrasound
    Cheng, Xiao-Ling
    Cao, Xiao-Yan
    Wang, Xiao-Qian
    Lin, Heng-Li
    Fang, Jin-Chuan
    Wang, Lin
    WORLD JOURNAL OF CLINICAL CASES, 2022, 10 (02) : 547 - 553
  • [25] Pain Management for First-Trimester Uterine Aspiration
    Moayedi, Ghazaleh
    Tschann, Mary
    OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2018, 73 (03) : 174 - 181
  • [26] FIRST-TRIMESTER PRENATAL-DIAGNOSIS IN TWIN PREGNANCIES
    CHRISTIAENS, GCML
    OOSTERWIJK, JC
    STIGTER, RH
    DEUTZTERLOUW, PP
    KNEPPERS, ALJ
    BAKKER, E
    PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 1994, 14 (01) : 51 - 55
  • [27] Rupture of the scar of a lower segment cesarean section transverse incision
    Grusetz, MW
    Tidsall, LH
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1942, 43 : 890 - 892
  • [28] Cervical and Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancies: Diagnosis and management
    Rizk, Botros
    Holliday, Candice
    Owens, Sheri
    Abuzeid, Mostafa
    MIDDLE EAST FERTILITY SOCIETY JOURNAL, 2013, 18 (02) : 67 - 73
  • [29] An updated guide to the diagnosis and management of cesarean scar pregnancies
    Liu, Lucy
    Ross, Whitney T.
    Chu, Amanda L.
    Deimling, Timothy A.
    CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 32 (04) : 255 - 262
  • [30] SCAR RUPTURE IN LABOR AFTER PREVIOUS LOWER UTERINE SEGMENT CESAREAN-SECTION - THE ROLE OF UTERINE ACTIVITY MEASUREMENT
    BECKLEY, S
    GEE, H
    NEWTON, JR
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1991, 98 (03): : 265 - 269