Oral tongue carcinoma: prognostic changes according to the updated 2020 version of the AJCC/UICC TNM staging system

被引:8
|
作者
Tagliabue, Marta [1 ,2 ]
De Berardinis, Rita [1 ]
Belloni, Pietro [3 ,4 ]
Gandini, Sara [3 ]
Scaglione, Donatella [5 ]
Maffini, Fausto [6 ]
Mirabella, Rosolino Antonino [7 ]
Riccio, Stefano [1 ]
Gioacchino, Giugliano [1 ]
Bruschini, Roberto [1 ]
Chu, Francesco [1 ]
Ansarin, Mohssen [1 ]
机构
[1] IRCCS, Div Otolaryngol & Head & Neck Surg, IEO, European Inst Oncol, Via Ripamonti 435, I-20141 Milan, Italy
[2] Univ Sassari, Dept Biomed Sci, Sassari, Italy
[3] IRCCS, Dept Expt Oncol, IEO, European Inst Oncol, Milan, Italy
[4] Univ Padua, Dept Stat Sci, Padua, Italy
[5] IRCCS, Div Data Management, European Inst Oncol, Milan, Italy
[6] IRCCS, Div Pathol, IEO, European Inst Oncol, Milan, Italy
[7] Fdn IRCCS Policlin San Matteo, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, Pavia, Italy
关键词
tongue cancer; TNM; depth of invasion (DOI); prognosis; survival; stage migration; AMERICAN JOINT COMMITTEE; 8TH EDITION; CANCER; DEPTH; INVASION;
D O I
10.14639/0392-100X-N2055
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Background. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of the 2017 8th TNM edition and the latest update in 2020 compared to the 7th in a large cohort of patients affected by oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma (OTSCC), considering all stages. Materials and methods. The cohort involved 300 patients affected by OTSCC treated with surgery. All cases were classified according to the 7th, 8th (2017), and the latest updated TNM edition (October 2020),. Patients were grouped based on the shift in tumour (T) category, lymph nodal (N) category and final pathological stage. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analyses were carried out. Results. According to the 7th edition, multivariate analysis OS revealed that stage IV patients had an almost 4-fold risk of death compared to stage I (HR = 3.81 95% CI: 2.32-6.25; p < 0.001). Regarding DFS, stage IV patients had a 2-fold greater risk of relapses, or second primary, than patients in stage I (HR = 2.51 95% CI: 1.68-3.74; p < 0.001). According to 2017 8th edition for OS, stage IV patients presented a 5-fold higher risk of death compared to patients in stage I (HR = 5.18 95% CI: 2.96-9.08; p < 0.001) and almost 4-old greater risk of relapses or second primary compared to patients in stage I considering DFS (HR = 3.61 95% CI: 2.28-5.71; p < 0.001). Regarding the recent edition of 8th TNM (2020), stage IV patients had an almost 5-fold greater risk of death compared to patients in stage I considering OS (HR = 4.84 95% CI: 2.74-8.55; p < 0.001), while for DFS they had 3-fold greater risk of relapse or second primary compared to patients in stage I (HR = 3.13 95% CI: 1.99-4.91; p < 0.001). Conclusions. This study confirmed that the recent update of the 8th edition of the TNM (2020) improves stratification and identification of advanced tumours, reducing the number of T3 compared to the 2017 edition and increasing the number of patients with pT4. This improvement made by the updated edition may reduce the risk of skipping adjuvant therapy.
引用
收藏
页码:140 / 149
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Performance of Preoperative Sonographic Staging of Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma Based on the Sixth Edition of the AJCC/UICC TNM Classification System
    Park, Jeong Seon
    Son, Kyu-Ri
    Na, Dong Gyu
    Kim, Eunhee
    Kim, Sungjun
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2009, 192 (01) : 66 - 72
  • [22] Ninth Version of the AJCC and UICC Nasopharyngeal Cancer TNM Staging Classification (vol 10, pg 1627, 2024)
    Pan, J. J.
    Mai, H. Q.
    Ng, W. T.
    JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2024, 10 (12) : 1736 - 1736
  • [23] Inflammatory breast cancer: a proposed conceptual shift in the UICC-AJCC TNM staging system
    Fouad, Tamer M.
    Barrera, Angelica M. Gutierrez
    Reuben, James M.
    Lucci, Anthony
    Woodward, Wendy A.
    Stauder, Michael C.
    Lim, Bora
    DeSnyder, Sarah M.
    Arun, Banu
    Gildy, Babiera
    Valero, Vicente
    Hortobagyi, Gabriel N.
    Ueno, Naoto T.
    LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2017, 18 (04): : E228 - E232
  • [24] Pitfalls in the staging of ampullary carcinomas: Is the current TNM (AJCC/UICC) system pathologically and clinically relevant?
    Khayyata, S.
    Thirabanjasak, D.
    Basturk, O.
    Prasad, M.
    Weaver, D.
    Adsay, N. V.
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2007, 20 : 119A - 120A
  • [25] Pitfalls in the staging of ampullary carcinomas: Is the current TNM (AJCC/UICC) system pathologically and clinically relevant?
    Khayyata, S.
    Thirabanjasak, D.
    Basturk, O.
    Prasad, M.
    Weaver, D.
    Adsay, N. V.
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2007, 87 : 119A - 120A
  • [26] Superiority of a new UICC-TNM staging system for gastric carcinoma
    Hayashi, H
    Ochiai, T
    Suzuki, T
    Shimada, H
    Hori, S
    Takeda, A
    Miyazawa, Y
    SURGERY, 2000, 127 (02) : 129 - 135
  • [27] Defining prognosis in oral cancers: Beyond TNM AJCC staging system
    Koul, R.
    Butler, J.
    Binahmed, A.
    Abdoh, A.
    Nason, R.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2006, 80 : S36 - S37
  • [28] Assessment of the prognostic value and N1b changes of the eighth TNM/AJCC staging system for differentiated thyroid carcinoma
    Jingtai Zhi
    Yu Wu
    Linfei Hu
    Jingzhu Zhao
    Hui Liu
    Xianhui Ruan
    Xiukun Hou
    Jun Zhang
    Xiangqian Zheng
    Ming Gao
    International Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2020, 25 : 59 - 66
  • [29] Assessment of the prognostic value and N1b changes of the eighth TNM/AJCC staging system for differentiated thyroid carcinoma
    Zhi, Jingtai
    Wu, Yu
    Hu, Linfei
    Zhao, Jingzhu
    Liu, Hui
    Ruan, Xianhui
    Hou, Xiukun
    Zhang, Jun
    Zheng, Xiangqian
    Gao, Ming
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 25 (01) : 59 - 66
  • [30] Is the Seventh Edition of the UICC/AJCC TNM Staging System Reasonable for Patients With Tumor Deposits in Colorectal Cancer?
    Tong, Lin-lin
    Gao, Peng
    Wang, Zhen-ning
    Song, Yong-xi
    Xu, Ying-ying
    Sun, Zhe
    Xing, Cheng-zhong
    Xu, Hui-mian
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2012, 255 (02) : 208 - 213