A review on effectiveness of best management practices in improving hydrology and water quality: Needs and opportunities

被引:242
|
作者
Liu, Yaoze [1 ]
Engel, Bernard A. [1 ]
Flanagan, Dennis C. [1 ,2 ]
Gitau, Margaret W. [1 ]
McMillan, Sara K. [1 ]
Chaubey, Indrajeet [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Purdue Univ, Dept Agr & Biol Engn, 225 South Univ St, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[2] USDA, ARS, 275 S Russell St, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[3] Purdue Univ, Dept Earth Atmospher & Planetary Sci, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
关键词
Low impact development (LID); Green infrastructure (GI); BMP; Nonpoint source; BMP effectiveness; Maintenance; VEGETATIVE FILTER STRIPS; IMPACT DEVELOPMENT PRACTICES; SURFACE-WATER; STORM-WATER; LAND-USE; CONSERVATION PRACTICES; PHOSPHORUS RETENTION; SEASONAL-VARIATION; CLIMATE-CHANGE; BUFFER STRIPS;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.05.212
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Best management practices (BMPs) have been widely used to address hydrology and water quality issues in both agricultural and urban areas. Increasing numbers of BMPs have been studied in research projects and implemented in watershed management projects, but a gap remains in quantifying their effectiveness through time. In this paper, we review the current knowledge about BMP efficiencies, which indicates that most empirical studies have focused on short-term efficiencies, while few have explored long-term efficiencies. Most simulation efforts that consider BMPs assume constant performance irrespective of ages of the practices, generally based on anticipated maintenance activities or the expected performance over the life of the BMP(s). However, efficiencies of BMPs likely change over time irrespective of maintenance due to factors such as degradation of structures and accumulation of pollutants. Generally, the impacts of BMPs implemented in water quality protection programs at watershed levels have not been as rapid or large as expected, possibly due to overly high expectations for practice long-term efficiency, with BMPs even being sources of pollutants under some conditions and during some time periods. The review of available datasets reveals that current data are limited regarding both short-term and long-term BMP efficiency. Based on this review, this paper provides suggestions regarding needs and opportunities. Existing practice efficiency data need to be compiled. New data on BMP efficiencies that consider important factors, such as maintenance activities, also need to be collected. Then, the existing and new data need to be analyzed. Further research is needed to create a framework, as well as modeling approaches built on the framework, to simulate changes in BMP efficiencies with time. The research community needs to work together in addressing these needs and opportunities, which will assist decision makers in formulating better decisions regarding BMP implementation in watershed management projects. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:580 / 593
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Improving Quality And Diffusing Best Practices: The Case Of Schizophrenia
    Horvitz-Lennon, Marcela
    Donohue, Julie M.
    Domino, Marisa E.
    Normand, Sharon-Lise T.
    HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2009, 28 (03) : 701 - 712
  • [42] Hyporheic Zone in Urban Streams: A Review and Opportunities for Enhancing Water Quality and Improving Aquatic Habitat by Active Management
    Lawrence, Justin E.
    Skold, Magnus E.
    Hussain, Fatima A.
    Silverman, David R.
    Resh, Vincent H.
    Sedlak, David L.
    Luthy, Richard G.
    McCray, John E.
    ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2013, 30 (08) : 480 - 501
  • [43] Analysis of Best Management Practices Implementation on Water Quality Using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool
    Motsinger, Jason
    Kalita, Prasanta
    Bhattarai, Rabin
    WATER, 2016, 8 (04)
  • [44] ASSESSING BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES EFFECTIVENESS AT THE WATERSHED SCALE
    Ice, G. G.
    APPLIED ENGINEERING IN AGRICULTURE, 2011, 27 (06) : 925 - 931
  • [45] Improving care quality through hybrid implementation/effectiveness studies: Best practices in design, methods, and measures
    Amy N Cohen
    Alison B Hamilton
    Mona Ritchie
    Brian S Mittman
    JoAnn E Kirchner
    Gail E Wyatt
    John C Fortney
    Gerhard Hellemann
    Honghu Liu
    Geoffrey M Curran
    Fiona Whelan
    Alicia M Eccles
    Louise E Parker
    Kirk McNagny
    Craig S Hutchinson
    Annapurni B Teague
    Christopher Reist
    Alexander S Young
    Implementation Science, 10 (Suppl 1)
  • [46] Best Practices in Quality Management for Innovation Performance
    Leavengood, Scott
    Anderson, Timothy R.
    2011 PROCEEDINGS OF PICMET 11: TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT IN THE ENERGY-SMART WORLD (PICMET), 2011,
  • [47] Gastric Cancer Survivorship: Multidisciplinary Management, Best Practices and Opportunities
    Cobani, Era
    Al Hallak, Mohammed Najeeb
    Shields, Anthony F.
    Maier, Jordan
    Kelly, Thomas E.
    Naidoo, Niren
    Tobon, Miguel
    Kim, Steve
    Beal, Eliza W.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL CANCER, 2024, 55 (02) : 519 - 533
  • [48] Challenges and opportunities for extension educators involved in best management practices
    Simonne, Eric H.
    Ozores-Hampton, Monica
    HORTTECHNOLOGY, 2006, 16 (03) : 403 - 407
  • [49] Meter management: Best practices for water utilities
    Schlenger, DL
    WATER-ENGINEERING & MANAGEMENT, 1997, 144 (03): : 33 - 36
  • [50] Meter management: best practices for water utilities
    Water Eng Manage, 3 (33-36):