Finite element modelling and dilation of FRP-confined concrete columns

被引:82
|
作者
Youssf, Osama [1 ]
ElGawady, Mohamed A. [2 ]
Mills, Julie E. [1 ]
Ma, Xing [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ S Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
[2] Missouri Univ Sci & Technol, Rolla, MO USA
关键词
FRP-confined concrete; K-C plasticity model; Concrete shear dilation; Finite element analysis; LS-DYNA; PRAGER PLASTICITY MODEL; BEHAVIOR; CYLINDERS; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.07.045
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Concrete dilation is one of the main parameters that controls the stress-strain behaviour of confined concrete. Several analytical studies have been carried out to predict the stress-strain behaviour of concrete encased in fibre-reinforced polymer (FRP), which is crucial for structural design. However, none of these studies have provided a simple formula to determine the dilation parameter that is always required in the finite element (FE) material modelling of concrete. This paper presents a simple empirical model predicting the confined concrete dilation parameter within the theoretical framework of a Karagozian and Case type concrete plasticity model. A set of 105 FRP-confined specimens with different unconfined concrete strengths (f(c)(')) and confinement moduli (E-1) was analysed using the LS-DYNA program. The model predictions of the confined ultimate strength (f(c,c)(')), confined ultimate axial strain (epsilon(cc)) and confined ultimate hoop strain (epsilon(h)) were compared with the corresponding experimental database results for each specimen. In addition, the model axial and hoop stress-strain curves of each specimen were developed and compared with the corresponding experimental ones. The proposed model was able to predict stress-strain curves of the test specimens quite well.The proposed model was able to predict f(c,c)(') with mean errors (M) and standard deviations (SD) of 2.6% and 10.7%, respectively. Similarly, the model predicted epsilon(cc) with M and SD values of 0.3% and 29.0%, respectively. Finally, the model was less successful in predicting epsilon(h) with M and SD values of 13.7% and 26.3%, respectively. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:70 / 85
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] FRP-confined concrete model
    Spoelstra, Marijn R.
    Monti, Giorgio
    Journal of Composites for Construction, 1999, 3 (03) : 143 - 150
  • [32] Nonlinear finite element modeling of rectangular/square concrete columns confined with FRP
    Doran, B.
    Koksal, H. O.
    Turgay, T.
    MATERIALS & DESIGN, 2009, 30 (08) : 3066 - 3075
  • [33] Refined approach for modelling strength enhancement of FRP-confined concrete
    Al Abadi, Haider
    El-Naga, Hossam Abo
    Shaia, Hussein
    Paton-Cole, Vidal
    CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2016, 119 : 152 - 174
  • [34] Damage model for FRP-confined concrete columns under cyclic loading
    Desprez, C.
    Mazars, J.
    Kotronis, P.
    Paultre, P.
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2013, 48 : 519 - 531
  • [35] Axial strength of eccentrically loaded FRP-confined short concrete columns
    Jiang C.
    Wu Y.-F.
    Polym., 2020, 6
  • [36] Experimental Investigation on Interfacial Defect Criticality of FRP-Confined Concrete Columns
    Qin, Renyuan
    Lau, Denvid
    Tam, Lik-ho
    Liu, Tiejun
    Zou, Dujian
    Zhou, Ao
    SENSORS, 2019, 19 (03)
  • [37] Recycled Aggregate Concrete in FRP-confined columns: A review of experimental results
    Xu, Jin-Jun
    Chen, Zong-Ping
    Xiao, Yan
    Demartino, Cristoforo
    Wang, Jun-Hua
    COMPOSITE STRUCTURES, 2017, 174 : 277 - 291
  • [38] Calibration of the FRP Resistance Reduction Factor for FRP-Confined Reinforced Concrete Building Columns
    Baji, Hassan
    JOURNAL OF COMPOSITES FOR CONSTRUCTION, 2017, 21 (03)
  • [39] Behavior of FRP-Confined Concrete-Filled Steel Tube Columns
    Lu, Yiyan
    Li, Na
    Li, Shan
    POLYMERS, 2014, 6 (05): : 1333 - 1349
  • [40] Interaction diagram methodology for design of FRP-confined reinforced concrete columns
    Rocca, Silvia
    Galati, Nestore
    Nanni, Antonio
    CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2009, 23 (04) : 1508 - 1520