Application of the Machine-Learning Model to Improve Prediction of Non-Sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis Status Among Breast Cancer Patients

被引:6
|
作者
Wu, Qian [1 ]
Deng, Li [1 ]
Jiang, Ying [2 ]
Zhang, Hongwei [2 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Publ Hlth Ctr, Dept Gen Surg, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Fudan Univ, Zhongshan Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Shanghai, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN SURGERY | 2022年 / 9卷
关键词
breast neoplasms; sentinel lymph node; nomogram; ultrasound; machine learning; AXILLARY DISSECTION; BIOPSY; RISK; NOMOGRAM; MULTICENTER; EXPRESSION; SURGERY;
D O I
10.3389/fsurg.2022.797377
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundPerforming axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) is the current standard option after a positive sentinel lymph node (SLN). However, whether 1-2 metastatic SLNs require ALND is debatable. The probability of metastasis in non-sentinel lymph nodes (NSLNs) can be calculated using nomograms. In this study, we developed an individualized model using machine-learning (ML) methods to select potential variables, which influence NSLN metastasis. Materials and MethodsCohorts of patients with early breast cancer who underwent SLN biopsy and ALND between 2012 and 2021 were created (training cohort, N 157 and validation cohort, N 58) for the development of the nomogram. Three ML methods were trained in the training set to create a strong predictive model. Finally, the multiple iterations of the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression method were used to determine the variables associated with NSLN status. ResultsFour independent variables (positive SLN number, absence of lymph node hilum, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), and total number of SLNs harvested) were combined to generate the nomogram. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) value of 0.759 was obtained in the entire set. The AUC values for the training set and the test set were 0.782 and 0.705, respectively. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test of the model fit accuracy was identified with p = 0.759. ConclusionThis study developed a nomogram that incorporates ultrasound (US)-related variables using the ML method and serves to clinically predict the non-metastatic status of NSLN and help in the selection of the appropriate treatment option.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Individualized prediction of non-sentinel lymph node metastasis in Chinese breast cancer patients with ≥ 3 positive sentinel lymph nodes based on machine-learning algorithms
    Xie, Xiangli
    Fang, Yutong
    He, Lifang
    Chen, Zexiao
    Chen, Chunfa
    Zeng, Huancheng
    Chen, Bingfeng
    Huang, Guangsheng
    Guo, Cuiping
    Zhang, Qunchen
    Wu, Jundong
    [J]. BMC CANCER, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [2] Predictors to Assess Non-Sentinel Lymph Node Status in Breast Cancer Patients with Sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis
    Jinno, Hiromitsu
    Sakata, Michio
    Asaga, Sota
    Wada, Masahiro
    Shimada, Toshiyuki
    Kitagawa, Yuko
    Suzuki, Takayuki
    Nakahara, Tadaki
    Kitamura, Naoto
    Kubo, Atsushi
    Mukai, Makio
    Ikeda, Tadashi
    Kitajima, Masaki
    [J]. BREAST JOURNAL, 2008, 14 (06): : 551 - 555
  • [3] Prediction of non-sentinel lymph node status in breast cancer with a micrometastatic sentinel node
    Schrenk, P
    Konstantiniuk, P
    Wölfl, S
    Bogner, S
    Haid, A
    Nemes, C
    Jagoutz-Herzlinger, M
    Redtenbacher, S
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2005, 92 (06) : 707 - 713
  • [4] Predictive factors for non-sentinel lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients with sentinel lymph node metastasis
    Kobayashi, N.
    Hanada, H.
    Utsumi, T.
    [J]. EJC SUPPLEMENTS, 2010, 8 (03): : 160 - 160
  • [5] A support vector machine model for predicting non-sentinel lymph node status in patients with sentinel lymph node positive breast cancer
    Ding, Xiaowen
    Xie, Shangnao
    Chen, Jie
    Mo, Wenju
    Yang, Hongjian
    [J]. TUMOR BIOLOGY, 2013, 34 (03) : 1547 - 1552
  • [6] Factors Predicting the Non-Sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis in Breast Cancer Patients With Sentinel Lymph Node
    Uras, Cihan
    Boler, Deniz E.
    Ince, Umit
    Cabioglu, Neslihan
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 18 : S183 - S183
  • [7] Predictors of non-sentinel lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients
    Goyal, A
    Douglas-Jones, A
    Newcombe, RG
    Mansel, RE
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2004, 40 (11) : 1731 - 1737
  • [8] Predictors to assess non-sentinel lymph node status in breast cancer patients with only one sentinel lymph node metastasis
    YANG Ben
    YANG Li
    ZUO Wen-shu
    GE Wen-kai
    ZHENG Gang
    ZHENG Mei-zhu
    YU Zhi-yong
    WANG Yong-sheng
    [J]. 中华医学杂志(英文版), 2013, 126 (03) : 476 - 481
  • [9] Predictors to assess non-sentinel lymph node status in breast cancer patients with only one sentinel lymph node metastasis
    Yang Ben
    Yang Li
    Zuo Wen-shu
    Ge Wen-kai
    Zheng Gang
    Zheng Mei-zhu
    Yu Zhi-yong
    Wang Yong-sheng
    [J]. CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 126 (03) : 476 - 481
  • [10] Prediction of non-sentinel lymph node involvement in breast cancer patients with a positive sentinel lymph node
    Reynders, Anneleen
    Brouckaert, Olivier
    Smeets, Ann
    Laenen, Annouschka
    Yoshihara, Emi
    Persyn, Frederik
    Floris, Giuseppe
    Leunen, Karin
    Amant, Frederic
    Soens, Julie
    Van Ongeval, Chantal
    Moerman, Philippe
    Vergote, Ignace
    Christiaens, Marie-Rose
    Staelens, Gracienne
    Van Eygen, Koen
    Vanneste, Alain
    Van Dam, Peter
    Colpaert, Cecile
    Neven, Patrick
    [J]. BREAST, 2014, 23 (04): : 453 - 459