US-Japan Trade Frictions: The Past, the Present, and Implications for the US-China Trade War

被引:22
|
作者
Urata, Shujiro [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Waseda Univ, Tokyo, Japan
[2] Japan Ctr Econ Res, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
protectionism; trade friction; trade war; F13; F51;
D O I
10.1111/aepr.12279
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The United States and Japan have been involved in trade frictions over a number of products including textiles, steel, automobiles, semi-conductors, and agricultural products over the last 50 years. US-Japan trade frictions have taken basically two forms: (i) the United States attempting to restrict Japan's exports to the United States; and (ii) the United States attempting to increase its exports to Japan by "opening" the Japanese market. By putting pressure on Japan to adopt necessary measures, the United States sought to achieve two main objectives: (i) to reduce its trade deficit vis-a-vis Japan; and (ii) to protect and/or promote US industries. The United States failed to achieve the first objective, while some success was achieved for the second objective. The United States triggered a trade war against China with the objectives of: (i) reducing the bilateral trade deficit; and (ii) stopping unfair trade practices by Chinese firms such as violations of intellectual property rights and forced technology transfer. Based on the experiences from the US-Japan trade frictions, the United States may achieve some success for the second objective, but not for the first. The chances of achieving the second objective would increase if the United States cooperates with countries such as Japan and the European Union, which are faced with similar problems.
引用
收藏
页码:141 / 159
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] US-China Trade War: A Way Out?
    Zhou, Weihuan
    Gao, Henry
    [J]. WORLD TRADE REVIEW, 2020, 19 (04) : 605 - 617
  • [22] US-China Trade War: Causes and Outcomes
    Kapustina, Larisa
    Lipkova, Ludmila
    Silin, Yakov
    Drevalev, Andrei
    [J]. INNOVATIVE ECONOMIC SYMPOSIUM 2019 - POTENTIAL OF EURASIAN ECONOMIC UNION (IES2019), 2020, 73
  • [23] Navigating the US-China Decoupling: Malaysia's Response to the US-China Trade War
    Kam, Andrew Jia-Yi
    [J]. ASIAN ECONOMIC PAPERS, 2024, 23 (02) : 144 - 173
  • [24] US-China Trade War: Potential Trade and Investment Spillovers into Malaysia*
    Tham, Siew Yean
    Yi, Andrew Kam Jia
    Ann, Tee Beng
    [J]. ASIAN ECONOMIC PAPERS, 2019, 18 (03) : 117 - 135
  • [25] The US-China trade war and Phase One agreement
    Bown, Chad P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POLICY MODELING, 2021, 43 (04) : 805 - 843
  • [26] Comment on "Evaluating the Impact of the US-China Trade War"
    Sussangkarn, Chalongphob
    [J]. ASIAN ECONOMIC POLICY REVIEW, 2020, 15 (01) : 96 - 97
  • [27] Consumer brand engagement in the US-China trade war
    Lee, Yi Hsuan
    Wei, Chiou-Fong
    Lee, Bruce C. Y.
    Cheng, Ya-Yun
    Chen, Yao
    [J]. ASIA PACIFIC JOURNAL OF MARKETING AND LOGISTICS, 2022, 34 (01) : 75 - 90
  • [28] US-China trade war imperils Amazon rainforest
    Fuchs, Richard
    Alexander, Peter
    Brown, Calum
    Cossar, Frances
    Henry, Roslyn C.
    Rounsevell, Mark
    [J]. NATURE, 2019, 567 (7749) : 451 - 454
  • [29] Americans' Attitudes toward the US-China Trade War
    Jin, Yongai
    Dorius, Shawn
    Xie, Yu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY CHINA, 2022, 31 (133) : 17 - 37
  • [30] BLOSSOMING OF US-CHINA TRADE
    不详
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING, 1974, 55 (04): : 18 - 18