New Longitudinal Component of the RENAL Nephrometry Score for Predicting the Operative Complexity in Transperitoneal Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy

被引:5
|
作者
Tachibana, Hidekazu [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Kondo, Tsunenori [3 ]
Ishiyama, Yudai [3 ]
Yoshino, Maki [3 ]
Yoshida, Kazuhiko [2 ]
Iizuka, Junpei [2 ]
Tanabe, Kazunari [2 ]
Takagi, Toshio [2 ]
机构
[1] Saiseikai Kazo Hosp, Dept Urol, Saitama, Japan
[2] Tokyo Womens Med Univ, Dept Urol, Tokyo, Japan
[3] Tokyo Womens Med Univ, Dept Urol, Adachi Med Ctr, Tokyo, Japan
[4] Saiseikai Kazo Hosp, Dept Urol, Kamitakayanagi 1680, Kazo, Saitama 3470101, Japan
关键词
robot-assisted partial nephrectomy; RENAL score; operative time; renal neoplasm; LAPAROSCOPIC PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY; ADHESIVE PROBABILITY SCORE; SURGICAL OUTCOMES; PERINEPHRIC FAT; LEARNING-CURVE; SYSTEM; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1089/end.2021.0716
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: In transperitoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN), an L score of 3 points according to the RENAL nephrometry scoring system does not necessarily denote operative complexity. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of the newly defined longitudinal component to analyze the operative complexity of RAPN.Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed transperitoneal RAPNs performed by a single experienced surgeon for renal tumors between 2017 and 2020. L component was defined as L ' 1 for midlocated tumors, L ' 2 for >50% below the polar line, and L ' 3 for >50% above the polar line. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to test associations between prolonged console time and preoperative factors. The perioperative outcomes were compared among the three cohorts of L ' components using propensity score matching: L ' 1 vs L ' 3 and L ' 1 vs L ' 2.Results: A total of 220 cases (L ' 1: 107, L ' 2: 65, L ' 3: 48) were analyzed. The median console time was prolonged (>130 minutes) in 55 patients (median 108, interquartile range: 90-130 minutes). Longitudinal location (L ' 3 odds ratio [OR]: 2.93, p = 0.01; L ' 2 OR: 2.32, p = 0.04), high Mayo adhesive probability score (p = 0.001), multiple renal arteries (p = 0.03), and large size (p = 0.04) were significantly associated with prolonged console time. After matching, 26 cases of L ' 1 and L ' 3 and 43 cases of L ' 1 and L ' 2 were selected. Console time (108 minutes vs 132 minutes, p = 0.017) and warm ischemia time (17 minutes vs 22 minutes, p = 0.03) were significantly longer in L ' 3 than in L ' 1. The difference in console time between L ' 1 and L ' 2 was not statistically significant (100 minutes vs 111 minutes, p = 0.08).Conclusion: In the new longitudinal assessment, upper location predicted prolonged console time compared with a middle or lower location. The L ' component may help preoperatively assess operative complexity.
引用
收藏
页码:762 / 769
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] RENAL nephrometry score: Predicting perioperative outcomes following open partial nephrectomy
    Basu, Supriya
    Khan, Imran Ahmad
    Das, Ranjit K.
    Dey, Ranjan K.
    Khan, Dawood
    Agarwal, Vishnu
    UROLOGY ANNALS, 2019, 11 (02) : 187 - 192
  • [32] Retroperitoneal versus transperitoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for posterior renal tumors: A matched pair analysis
    Mottrie, A.
    Porter, J.
    Bhayani, S.
    Sun, M.
    Novara, G.
    De Naeyer, G.
    Schatteman, P.
    Ficarra, V
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2012, 11 (01) : E26 - U340
  • [33] Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for complex renal masses
    Patton M.W.
    Salevitz D.A.
    Tyson M.D., II.
    Andrews P.E.
    Ferrigni E.N.
    Nateras R.N.
    Castle E.P.
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2016, 10 (1) : 27 - 31
  • [34] Perinephric Fat Thickness Is an Independent Predictor of Operative Complexity During Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy
    Macleod, Liam C.
    Hsi, Ryan S.
    Gore, John L.
    Wright, Jonathan L.
    Harper, Jonathan D.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2014, 28 (05) : 587 - 591
  • [35] Retroperitoneal or transperitoneal approach in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy, which one is better?
    Zhou, Jing
    Liu, Zheng-Huan
    Cao, De-Hong
    Peng, Zhu-Feng
    Song, Pan
    Yang, Luchen
    Liu, Liang-Ren
    Wei, Qiang
    Dong, Qiang
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (10): : 3299 - 3308
  • [36] Is robot-assisted partial nephrectomy safe for high complexity tumors?
    Koukourikis, Periklis
    Alqahtani, Ali Abdullah
    Rha, Koon Ho
    TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2020, 9 (06) : 2455 - 2458
  • [37] MULTI-CENTER VALIDATION OF THE RENAL NEPHROMETRY SCORING SYSTEM AS A PREDICTOR OF ROBOT-ASSISTED PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY COMPLICATIONS
    Tanagho, Youssef S.
    Kaouk, Jihad H.
    Allaf, Mohamad E.
    Rogers, Craig G.
    Stifelman, Michael D.
    Mullins, Jeffrey K.
    Hillyer, Shahab P.
    Kaczmarek, Bartosz F.
    Chiu, Yichun
    Bhayani, Sam B.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2012, 26 : A165 - A166
  • [38] Head to head comparison between RENAL and PADUA nephrometry scores in predicting TRIFECTA achievement in off-clamp Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy
    Flammia, R. S.
    Anceschi, U.
    Tufano, A.
    Antonelli, L.
    Brassetti, A.
    Proeitti, F.
    Tuderti, G.
    Gallucci, M.
    Leonardo, C.
    Simone, G.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2022, 81 : S89 - S90
  • [39] The modified R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score comprising longitudinal tumor localization is better for predicting intraoperative collecting system entry during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy
    Kobayashi, Keita
    Ban, Yoshimasa
    Hiroyoshi, Toshiya
    Isoyama, Naohito
    Shiraishi, Koji
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY, 2024, 17 (02)
  • [40] Significant impact of R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score on changes in postoperative renal function early after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy
    Hideaki Miyake
    Junya Furukawa
    Nobuyuki Hinata
    Mototsugu Muramaki
    Kazushi Tanaka
    Masato Fujisawa
    International Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2015, 20 : 586 - 592