Comments on the jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic on copyright

被引:0
|
作者
Bohacek, Martin [1 ]
机构
[1] Prague Univ Econ & Business, Fac Int Relat, Dept Business Law & European Law, Prague, Czech Republic
关键词
copyright; constitutional protection of copyright; case law of the Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic; concept of constitutional protection of copyright in the Czech Republic; constitutional court;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper focuses on the analysis of the application of the principles and provisions of constitutional law to the area of copyright in selected case law of the Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic and confirms their general importance, which manifested itself in the problems of legislation and case law during the Covid-19 pandemic. The starting point is to identify the principles and individual provisions of the constitutional law of the Czech Republic applicable to the protection of intangible objects of copyright, in particular the provisions of Art. 34, (1) Charter of Fundamental Rights and Freedoms of the Czech Republic on the protection of the results of creative intellectual activity. The aim is to find out how the Constitutional Court resolves conflicts between individual constitutional rights when they are infringed. Further goal is to consider the concept of constitutional protection of this field in the Czech Republic to compare with the concept of constitutional EU law and with international law. This will be done using the method of analysis and legal comparison.
引用
收藏
页码:231 / 246
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] AFFIRMATIVE ACTION IN THE JURISPRUDENCE OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT.
    Rodolfo Figueroa, G.
    [J]. REVISTA CHILENA DE DERECHO, 2016, 43 (02): : 401 - 431
  • [32] The Proportionality Principle in the Jurisprudence of the Russian Constitutional Court
    Troitskaya, Alexandra
    [J]. REVIEW OF CENTRAL AND EAST EUROPEAN LAW, 2021, 46 (02) : 203 - 233
  • [33] TRENDS IN JURISPRUDENCE OF GERMAN FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL COURT
    HAHN, HJ
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE LAW, 1978, 26 (04): : 631 - 644
  • [34] TRENDS IN THE JURISPRUDENCE OF THE GERMAN FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL COURT
    HAHN, HJ
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE LAW, 1968, 16 (04): : 570 - 579
  • [35] Meanings of the Administrative Act in the Constitutional Court Jurisprudence
    Diaz Diez, Cristian Andres
    [J]. REVISTA ESTUDIOS SOCIO-JURIDICOS, 2019, 21 (02): : 259 - 291
  • [36] The concept of tax in the jurisprudence of the Colombian Constitutional Court
    Romero Molina, Cesar A.
    Bernal Sanchez, Laura Victoria
    Soto Contreras, Eleazar
    [J]. DIXI, 2012, 14 (15): : 118 - 131
  • [37] THE PRINCIPLE OF PROPORTIONALITY ON THE JURISPRUDENCE OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT.
    Arnold, Rainer
    Martinez Estay, Jose Ignacio
    Zuniga Urbina, Francisco
    [J]. ESTUDIOS CONSTITUCIONALES, 2012, 10 (01): : 65 - 116
  • [38] The test of proportionality in the jurisprudence of the Peruvian Constitutional Court
    Bertel, Maria
    [J]. ICON-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, 2017, 15 (02): : 541 - 545
  • [39] Constitutional Court of the Republic of Croatia
    Stern, Mira
    [J]. CROATIAN AND COMPARATIVE PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2005, 5 (01): : 213 - 215
  • [40] Constitutional Court of the Republic of Croatia
    Omejec, Jasna
    [J]. CROATIAN AND COMPARATIVE PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2007, 7 (02): : 461 - 478