Bridging the Gap Between Methodology and Qualitative Data Analysis Software: A Practical Guide for Educators and Qualitative Researchers

被引:13
|
作者
Kalpokas, Neringa [1 ]
Radivojevic, Ivana [2 ]
机构
[1] IE Univ, IE Sch Human Sci & Technol, Madrid, Spain
[2] IE Business Sch, Madrid, Spain
来源
SOCIOLOGICAL RESEARCH ONLINE | 2022年 / 27卷 / 02期
关键词
ATLAS; ti; computer-assisted qualitative data analysis software (CAQDAS); MAXQDA; NVivo; qualitative data analysis methodology;
D O I
10.1177/13607804211003579
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
The interpretative and flexible nature of qualitative research is one of its hallmark strengths, yet this can pose a significant obstacle for researchers who wish to incorporate computer-assisted qualitative data analysis software (CAQDAS), especially for educators of CAQDAS and researchers who may have abandoned CAQDAS following past frustrations. We seek to help qualitative researchers and teachers by illustrating how CAQDAS can be used to follow specific analytic strategies (e.g. inductive and deductive analysis, category identification and synthesis, and qualitative model building). To bridge the gap between qualitative methodology and CAQDAS, this article provides guidelines for researchers to familiarise themselves with widely used qualitative analysis strategies, and learn how ATLAS.ti, MAXQDA, and NVivo can be used in each phase of the qualitative analysis process. By effectively translating analytic strategies into CAQDAS features, CAQDAS can greatly facilitate data management, analysis, and collaboration when software features are harnessed to realise analytic strategies.
引用
收藏
页码:313 / 341
页数:29
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A Systematic Review of Emotion Regulation Assessments in US Schools: Bridging the Gap Between Researchers and Educators
    Zi Jia Ng
    Cynthia J. Willner
    Morgan D. Mannweiler
    Jessica D. Hoffmann
    Craig S. Bailey
    Christina Cipriano
    [J]. Educational Psychology Review, 2022, 34 : 2825 - 2865
  • [32] A Systematic Review of Emotion Regulation Assessments in US Schools: Bridging the Gap Between Researchers and Educators
    Ng, Zi Jia
    Willner, Cynthia J.
    Mannweiler, Morgan D.
    Hoffmann, Jessica D.
    Bailey, Craig S.
    Cipriano, Christina
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2022, 34 (04) : 2825 - 2865
  • [33] Bridging the Semantic Gap between Qualitative and Quantitative Models of Distributed Systems
    Liu, Si
    Meseguer, Jose
    Olveczky, Peter Csaba
    Zhang, Min
    Basin, David
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACM ON PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES-PACMPL, 2022, 6 (OOPSLA): : 315 - 344
  • [34] A Methodology Concerning the Use of Qualitative Data Analysis Software to Read Landscape Narratives in Movies
    Farmer, Tobias
    Brett, Saul
    Lisa, Rohrbaugh
    [J]. JAHRBUCH DER BERLINER MUSEEN, 2018, 60 (02) : 77 - 86
  • [35] Qualitative data analysis: conceptual and practical considerations
    Liamputtong, Pranee
    [J]. HEALTH PROMOTION JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2009, 20 (02) : 133 - 139
  • [36] Bridging the gap between sport science and coaching: A qualitative analysis of perceptions of South African coaches
    Kubayi, Alliance
    Coopoo, Yoga
    Toriola, Abel
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL SPORTS STUDIES, 2021, 43 (02): : 27 - 38
  • [37] Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis
    Radford, Marie L.
    [J]. LIBRARY & INFORMATION SCIENCE RESEARCH, 2008, 30 (02) : 158 - 159
  • [38] Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis
    Rotta Furlanetti, Maria Renata
    de Barros, Nelson Filice
    [J]. CIENCIA & SAUDE COLETIVA, 2013, 18 (01): : 283 - 284
  • [39] Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis
    Martin, Vivian B.
    [J]. GROUNDED THEORY REVIEW, 2006, 5 (2-3): : 119 - 129
  • [40] Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative analysis
    Stebbins, Robert A.
    [J]. HEALTH, 2006, 10 (03): : 378 - 380