Understanding farmers' intention to adopt improved natural grassland using the theory of planned behavior

被引:150
|
作者
Borges, Joao Augusto Rossi [1 ]
Oude Lansink, Alfons G. J. M. [1 ]
Ribeiro, Claudio Marques [2 ]
Lutke, Vanessa [3 ]
机构
[1] Wageningen Univ, Business Econ Grp, NL-6706 KN Wageningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Fed Pampa, Dom Pedrito, RS, Brazil
[3] Univ Estadual Rio Grande do Sul, Santana Do Livramento, RS, Brazil
关键词
Theory of planned behavior; Adoption; Improved natural grassland; Farmers' decisions; DAIRY FARMERS; CONSERVATION; MANAGEMENT; ATTITUDES; DECISIONS; ENGLAND;
D O I
10.1016/j.livsci.2014.09.014
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Studies on the adoption of innovations usually ignore underlying psychological constructs that affect farmers' decisions and behavior, such as intention, perceptions, and beliefs. This paper uses psychological constructs from the theory of planned behavior (TPB) to analyze factors that affect the adoption of improved natural grassland. The TPB hypothesizes that adoption is driven by intention, which in turn is determined by three psychological constructs: attitude, subjective norm, and perceived behavioral control. These three psychological constructs are derived from behavioral, normative and control beliefs, respectively. The first objective was to identify the influence of attitude, subjective norm, and perceived behavioral control on the intention of farmers to use improved natural grassland. The second objective was to understand the role of farmers' beliefs as drivers of their attitude, subjective norm, and perceived behavioral control. The theoretical framework and model were applied to a sample of 214 Brazilian cattle farmers. Results showed that attitude, subjective norm, and perceived behavioral control were all positively and significantly correlated with intention. The intention of farmers to use improved natural grassland was therefore influenced by farmers' evaluation of the use of improved natural grassland (attitude), their perceptions about the social pressure to use this innovation (subjective norm), and their perceptions about their own capability (perceived behavioral control). Six behavioral beliefs were the drivers of attitude: increase cattle weight gains, increase number of animals per hectare, have pasture throughout the year, increase pasture resistance, prevent soil erosion, and decrease feeding costs. Seven normative beliefs were the drivers of subjective norm: family, friends, neighbor farmers, cattle traders, workers in the place where they buy their inputs, extension agents, and government. Three control beliefs were the drivers of perceived behavioral control: sufficient knowledge, sufficient skills, and availability of qualified technical assistance. The drivers of attitude, subjective norm, and perceived behavioral control can be used by policy makers to increase the adoption rate of improved natural grassland. Emphasis should be given to the six perceived benefits of adopting improved natural grassland, the drivers of attitude. The individuals and groups who were found to influence farmers' decisions to use it, the drivers of subjective norm, can be used as channels to disseminate information about the innovation. The drivers of perceived behavioral control are factors which facilitate the use of improved natural grassland. Ensuring that these three factors are available to farmers can improve the adoption rate for this innovation. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:163 / 174
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Modeling farmers' intention to use pesticides: An expanded version of the theory of planned behavior
    Bagheri, Asghar
    Bondori, Abolmohammad
    Allahyari, Mohammad Sadegh
    Damalas, Christos A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2019, 248
  • [22] Predicting consumers' intention to adopt hybrid electric vehicles: using an extended version of the theory of planned behavior model
    Wang, Shanyong
    Fan, Jin
    Zhao, Dingtao
    Yang, Shu
    Fu, Yuanguang
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION, 2016, 43 (01) : 123 - 143
  • [23] Predicting consumers’ intention to adopt hybrid electric vehicles: using an extended version of the theory of planned behavior model
    Shanyong Wang
    Jin Fan
    Dingtao Zhao
    Shu Yang
    Yuanguang Fu
    [J]. Transportation, 2016, 43 : 123 - 143
  • [24] Identifying psychological factors that determine cattle farmers' intention to use improved natural grassland
    Borges, Joao Augusto Rossi
    Lansink, Alfons G. J. M. Oude
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 45 : 89 - 96
  • [25] Understanding the intention to adopt artificial insemination technology in pig by tribal farmers
    Sharma, Ph Romen
    Singh, Mahak
    Sinha, Pankaj Kumar
    Kumar, Bagish
    Mollier, R. Talli
    Rajkhowa, D. J.
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCES, 2021, 91 (06): : 449 - 454
  • [26] Comparing groups of Brazilian cattle farmers with different levels of intention to use improved natural grassland
    Borges, Joao Augusto Rossi
    Lansink, Alfons G. J. M. Oude
    [J]. LIVESTOCK SCIENCE, 2015, 178 : 296 - 305
  • [27] Intention to adopt bicycle-sharing in China: introducing environmental concern into the theory of planned behavior model
    Min Zhu
    Xianfeng Hu
    Zhengzheng Lin
    Jun Li
    Shanyong Wang
    Chengyuan Wang
    [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2020, 27 : 41740 - 41750
  • [28] Intention to adopt bicycle-sharing in China: introducing environmental concern into the theory of planned behavior model
    Zhu, Min
    Hu, Xianfeng
    Lin, Zhengzheng
    Li, Jun
    Wang, Shanyong
    Wang, Chengyuan
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2020, 27 (33) : 41740 - 41750
  • [29] Understanding Impact Investment Intention Using the Extended Theory of Planned Behaviour
    Rathee, Prerna
    Aggarwal, Shalini
    [J]. GLOBAL BUSINESS REVIEW, 2022,
  • [30] It's about Planning: Understanding Young Millennials' Intention toward Marriage Using the Theory of Planned Behavior
    Dai, Minhao
    Chilson, Nicholas
    [J]. MARRIAGE AND FAMILY REVIEW, 2022, 58 (03): : 225 - 244