The Environmental Assessment on Chinese Logistics Enterprises Based on Non-Radial DEA

被引:11
|
作者
Liu, Jie [1 ]
Yuan, Chunhui [1 ]
Li, Xiaolong [2 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Univ Posts & Telecommun, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 100876, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Univ Posts & Telecommun, Sch Modern Post, Beijing 100876, Peoples R China
关键词
sustainability; green logistics; Chinese logistics; DEA; DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION; UNIFIED EFFICIENCY; ECO-EFFICIENCY; POWER-PLANTS; SUSTAINABILITY; INDUSTRY; ENERGY; MODEL; CO2;
D O I
10.3390/en12244760
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Under the new situation of economic development in China, the logistics industry is facing unbalanced development regarding economic and environmental performance. From the enterprise level, this study investigated the sustainability of Chinese logistics based on the environmental assessment data envelopment analysis (DEA) model, and measured the unified efficiency of a logistics company under two different production arrangement strategies. The empirical measurement provides several findings. First, logistics enterprises give higher priority to operational benefits than environmental performance. Second, under the operational priority of production arrangement, small and medium-sized enterprises' (SMEs) unified efficiency is better than a large enterprise, and private enterprises' unified efficiency is better than state-owned enterprises. Moreover, the empirical study has further proved that the sustainability development of Chinese logistics is still at the primary stage; when facing trade-offs in the sustainability context, logistics companies still prioritize operational performance first. Therefore, transforming corporate strategy into an environmental sustainable priority and realizing logistics sustainability still has a long way to go, which is the backbone of realizing balanced development of both the economy and environment.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Non-radial DEA Index for Peruvian Regional Competitiveness
    Vincent Charles
    Guillermo Díaz
    Social Indicators Research, 2017, 134 : 747 - 770
  • [22] Research on Regional Environmental Performance and its Influential Factors in the North of China based on Non-radial DEA Model
    Bai, Yongping
    Hao, Yongpei
    2012 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ECOLOGY, WASTE RECYCLING, AND ENVIRONMENT (ICEWE 2012), 2012, 7 : 171 - 180
  • [23] Two-stage innovation efficiency of new energy enterprises in China: A non-radial DEA approach
    Wang, Qunwei
    Hang, Ye
    Sun, Licheng
    Zhao, Zengyao
    TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2016, 112 : 254 - 261
  • [24] DEA-based Performance Measurement of Seaports in Northeast Asia: Radial and Non-radial Approach
    Jiang, Bao
    Li, Jian
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF SHIPPING AND LOGISTICS, 2009, 25 (02): : 219 - 236
  • [25] Fuzzy assessment of performance of a decision making units using DEA: A non-radial approach
    Angiz, M. Zerafat L.
    Emrouznejad, A.
    Mustafa, A.
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2010, 37 (07) : 5153 - 5157
  • [26] Assessing the performance of Taiwan's environmental protection system with a non-radial network DEA approach
    Huang, Chin-wei
    Chiu, Yung-ho
    Fang, Wei-ta
    Shen, Neng
    ENERGY POLICY, 2014, 74 : 547 - 556
  • [27] An assessment of the green development efficiency of industrial parks in China: Based on non-desired output and non-radial DEA model
    Yu, Xiang
    STRUCTURAL CHANGE AND ECONOMIC DYNAMICS, 2023, 66 : 81 - 88
  • [28] Measurement of returns to scale using a non-radial DEA model
    Krivonozhko, V. E.
    Forsund, F. R.
    Rozhnov, A. V.
    Lychev, A. V.
    DOKLADY MATHEMATICS, 2012, 85 (01) : 144 - 148
  • [29] Environmental assessment on coal-fired power plants in US north-east region by DEA non-radial measurement
    Sueyoshi, Toshiyuki
    Goto, Mika
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2015, 50 : 125 - 139
  • [30] Measurement of returns to scale using non-radial DEA models
    Krivonozhko, Vladimir E.
    Forsund, Finn R.
    Lychev, Andrey V.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2014, 232 (03) : 664 - 670