Response of carbon uptake to abiotic and biotic drivers in an intensively managed Lei bamboo forest

被引:37
|
作者
Liu, Yuli [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhou, Guomo [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Du, Huaqiang [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Berninger, Frank [2 ,4 ,5 ]
Mao, Fangjie [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Li, Xuejian [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Chen, Liang [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Cui, Lu [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Li, Yangguang [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhu, Di'en [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Xu, Lin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang A&F Univ, State Key Lab Subtrop Silviculture, Linan 311300, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang A&F Univ, Key Lab Carbon Cycling Forest Ecosyst & Carbon Se, Linan 311300, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[3] Zhejiang A&F Univ, Sch Environm & Resources Sci, Linan 311300, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Helsinki, Dept Forest Ecol, POB 27, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland
[5] Univ Helsinki, Inst Atmospher & Earth Syst Res Forest Sci, Fac Agr & Forestry, Helsinki, Finland
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Phyllostachys praecox; Net ecosystem exchange; Ecosystem respiration; Gross ecosystem productivity; Seasonal variation; Random forest; CANOPY CONDUCTANCE; FLUX MEASUREMENTS; CLIMATE CONTROLS; ENERGY FLUX; CO2; FLUX; ECOSYSTEM; TEMPERATE; MODEL; BOREAL; WATER;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.06.046
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Lei bamboo (Phyllostachys praecox) is widely distributed in southeastern China. We used eddy covariance to analyze carbon sequestration capacity of a Lei bamboo forest (2011-2013) and to identify the seasonal biotic and abiotic determinants of carbon fluxes. A machine learning algorithm called random forest (RF) was used to identify factors that affected carbon fluxes. The RF model predicted well the gross ecosystem productivity (GEP), ecosystem respiration (RE) and net ecosystem exchange (NEE), and displayed variations in the drivers between different seasons. Mean annual NEE, RE, and GEP were -105.2 +/- 23.1, 1264.5 +/- 45.2, and 1369.6 +/- 52.5 g C m(-2), respectively. Climate warming increased RE more than GEP when water inputs were not limiting. Summer drought played little role in suppressing GEP, but low soil moisture contents suppressed RE and increased the carbon sink during drought in the summer. The most important drivers of NEE were soil temperature in spring, summer, and winter, and photosynthetically active radiation in autumn. Air and soil temperature were important drivers of GEP in all seasons.
引用
收藏
页码:713 / 722
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Abiotic and Biotic Drivers of Soil Fungal Communities in Response to Dairy Manure Amendment
    Schlatter, Daniel C.
    Gamble, Joshua D.
    Castle, Sarah
    Rogers, Julia
    Wilson, Melissa
    [J]. APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2023, 89 (06) : e0193122
  • [22] Disentangling biotic and abiotic drivers of intraspecific trait variation in woody plant seedlings at forest edges
    Zheng, Shilu
    Webber, Bruce L.
    Didham, Raphael K.
    Chen, Chun
    Yu, Mingjian
    [J]. ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2021, 11 (14): : 9728 - 9740
  • [23] Decoupled abiotic and biotic drivers of aboveground and topsoil organic carbon stocks in temperate forests
    Kazempour Larsary, Maryam
    Pourbabaei, Hassan
    Salehi, Ali
    Yousefpour, Rasoul
    Ali, Arshad
    [J]. LAND DEGRADATION & DEVELOPMENT, 2022, 33 (14) : 2464 - 2476
  • [24] Carbon and Nutrient Limitations of Microbial Metabolism in Xingkai Lake, China: Abiotic and Biotic Drivers
    Chen, Xingting
    Zhang, Weizhen
    Geng, Mengdie
    Shen, Ji
    Wang, Jianjun
    [J]. MICROBIAL ECOLOGY, 2024, 87 (01)
  • [25] Impact of intensive management on the carbon flux variation characteristics of the Lei bamboo (Phyllostachys praecox) forest
    Zhang, Mingxia
    You, Guangyong
    Wang, Yan
    Yan, Ruiqiang
    Zou, Changxin
    Chen, Shulin
    [J]. GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION, 2024, 50
  • [26] Growing the urban forest: tree performance in response to biotic and abiotic land management
    Oldfield, Emily E.
    Felson, Alexander J.
    Auyeung, D. S. Novem
    Crowther, Thomas W.
    Sonti, Nancy F.
    Harada, Yoshiki
    Maynard, Daniel S.
    Sokol, Noah W.
    Ashton, Mark S.
    Warren, Robert J., II
    Hallett, Richard A.
    Bradford, Mark A.
    [J]. RESTORATION ECOLOGY, 2015, 23 (05) : 707 - 718
  • [27] Abiotic and biotic drivers of tree trait effects on soil microbial biomass and soil carbon concentration
    Beugnon, Remy
    Bu, Wensheng
    Bruelheide, Helge
    Davrinche, Andrea
    Du, Jianqing
    Haider, Sylvia
    Kunz, Matthias
    von Oheimb, Goddert
    Perles-Garcia, Maria D. D.
    Saadani, Mariem
    Scholten, Thomas
    Seitz, Steffen
    Singavarapu, Bala
    Trogisch, Stefan
    Wang, Yanfen
    Wubet, Tesfaye
    Xue, Kai
    Yang, Bo
    Cesarz, Simone
    Eisenhauer, Nico
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS, 2023, 93 (02)
  • [28] Leaf litter nutrient uptake in an intermittent blackwater river: influence of tree species and associated biotic and abiotic drivers
    Mehring, Andrew S.
    Kuehn, Kevin A.
    Thompson, Aaron
    Pringle, Catherine M.
    Rosemond, Amy D.
    First, Matthew R.
    Lowrance, R. Richard
    Vellidis, George
    [J]. FUNCTIONAL ECOLOGY, 2015, 29 (06) : 849 - 860
  • [29] Effects of Chicken Farming on Soil Active Organic Carbon and Carbon Pool Management Index in the Lei Bamboo (Phyllostachys praecox) Forest
    Gai, Xu
    Zhang, Jian
    Lü, Heng
    Huang, Zhiyuan
    Li, Qiaoling
    Zhong, Zheke
    Bian, Fangyuan
    Zhang, Xiaoping
    [J]. Linye Kexue/Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2023, 59 (12): : 78 - 86
  • [30] Biotic and abiotic drivers of the tree growth and mortality trade-off in an old-growth temperate forest
    Zhu, Yu
    Hogan, J. Aaron
    Cai, Huiying
    Xun, Yanhan
    Jiang, Feng
    Jin, Guangze
    [J]. FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, 404 : 354 - 360